What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dion Lewis (2 Viewers)

Colts are doing a smart job of blitzing to Lewis's protection, keeping him in the backfield. With half the Patriots O-Line hurt, Brady isnt going to have the time to wait for Lewis to chip and wheel open. Its a game planning issue to neutralize the back out of the backfield in the passing game.

 
Colts are doing a smart job of blitzing to Lewis's protection, keeping him in the backfield. With half the Patriots O-Line hurt, Brady isnt going to have the time to wait for Lewis to chip and wheel open. Its a game planning issue to neutralize the back out of the backfield in the passing game.
:goodposting:

 
Colts are doing a smart job of blitzing to Lewis's protection, keeping him in the backfield. With half the Patriots O-Line hurt, Brady isnt going to have the time to wait for Lewis to chip and wheel open. Its a game planning issue to neutralize the back out of the backfield in the passing game.
How many Patriot ### kicking did it take the Colts go figure this out?

 
Yeah hes in there. The have just featured Edelman and Amendola heavily. BB must like the mismatch they get from them. Gronk doesnt have a catch with only 1 target.

Blount only has 6 carries just 1 happened to be a 38yd TD. Maybe he read all you guys talking about how much they were going to run and BB decided to do the opposite.

 
As a Lewis owner going against blount this game could cost me my matchup. Oh well he's been so awesome Ill cut him some slack

 
We knew that the game script today would quite possibly favor Blount over Lewis though. This is how NE has dismantled Indy for last several meetings. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

 
6 isn't a bad floor... AP had 6 today too.
It's not so much the point total as it is his usage floor. I could point to AP or Bell having sub-par days but they each touched the ball 25 times today.
Lewis has a usage floor, too, it's just a different kind of usage floor. Lewis played 69% of the snaps in the first half, 62% through the early parts of the 4th quarter. He got his 6 targets, which are the lifeblood of his PPR value. As mentioned in the thread, those targets are the fantasy equivalent of many more carries. Think of each target as three carries each, and that's 22 "touches" worth of usage in PPR leagues. He just didn't do much with it tonight.

I feel like if you promised me Dion Lewis would be playing 60+% of the snaps and pulling in 6+ targets a game, I'd start him every game in PPR. That's a recipe for 10+ points a game from receiving alone. In standard, for sure, games like this are killers. Which is why he's more in the low-RB1 / high-RB2 range in standard, vs. the solid-RB1 range in PPR.

 
6 isn't a bad floor... AP had 6 today too.
That's a good perspective. So many people out crying and whining about how guys aren't putting up 25 every week (and I get it. I hate watching a guy like Lacy or Cooks be pedestrian while some guys like Freeman and Hopkins and even Steve Smith seem to roll up big numbers no matter what) but it just happens.

hAntonio Brown is killing his fantasy teams. Eddie, CJ Anderson, dozens others. The consistency isn't there.

But with Lewis, this was just how the game script went and it wasn't a surprise at all to many. Honestly, if Gronk doesn't get that ONE pass for the TD tonight, he scores about 4.5 points this week. It's only because Lewis is in the role that he is that we over analyze it.

 
He's probably better than mediocre but I don't think he's any more talented than Vereen was in his NE prime. I don't think this will be a 50/50 split as Lewis' ability as a receiver will net him more touches than Blount. I just find it funny than most everyone is discounting Blount because he got his in a blowout.
I just find it funny that most everyone is discounting Lewis because Blount go his in a blowout.
Belichek's history says otherwise. I've owned both Ridley and Vereen in their primes and trying to figure out what Belichek is going to do is damn near impossible. Both Lewis and Blount can be fantasy relevant just like Ridley and Vereen were. I just think owners of either of those guys need to temper their expectations a bit. It's frustrating being involved in the Pats running game...I'm amazed so many have you have forgotten that?
That was the story until today. Today we saw the birth of a clear 3 down rb for the patriots which is fantasy gold.
Again nothing has changed with Belichek. Certain matchups are going to favor the power back and tonight is one of those nights.m I still like Lewis and own him in a couple leagues but A zebra doesn't change his stripes.
This is the correct answer here. As a Lewis owner, if anyone can figure out the man in the hoodie, please let me know when I should bench Lewis?

kthxbye

 
6 isn't a bad floor... AP had 6 today too.
It's not so much the point total as it is his usage floor. I could point to AP or Bell having sub-par days but they each touched the ball 25 times today.
Which is actually GOOD for Lewis. Nobody scores when they don't play. I worry more about the back that gets 25 touches and comes up with 6 than I do the guy that gets 8 touches and comes up with 6.

 
We knew that the game script today would quite possibly favor Blount over Lewis though. This is how NE has dismantled Indy for last several meetings. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
That's not really what happened though. Sure looking at the stat sheet that's what appeared to have happened but Blount broke of a long run for a TD and caught his first ever TD pass. Lewis out-snapped him by far but was often forced to block and just couldn't break one. It happens. People need to pump the brakes a bit - both ways, good and bad.

 
No surprise last night. The game plan also protected Dion as an injured player long term. I thought it was smart and win or lose my FF matchup, I just need him healthy going forward.

 
Some dude in the update thread said he had a high ankle sprain on his last carry....that's just a troll right?

 
He's probably better than mediocre but I don't think he's any more talented than Vereen was in his NE prime. I don't think this will be a 50/50 split as Lewis' ability as a receiver will net him more touches than Blount. I just find it funny than most everyone is discounting Blount because he got his in a blowout.
I just find it funny that most everyone is discounting Lewis because Blount go his in a blowout.
Belichek's history says otherwise. I've owned both Ridley and Vereen in their primes and trying to figure out what Belichek is going to do is damn near impossible. Both Lewis and Blount can be fantasy relevant just like Ridley and Vereen were. I just think owners of either of those guys need to temper their expectations a bit. It's frustrating being involved in the Pats running game...I'm amazed so many have you have forgotten that?
That was the story until today. Today we saw the birth of a clear 3 down rb for the patriots which is fantasy gold.
Again nothing has changed with Belichek. Certain matchups are going to favor the power back and tonight is one of those nights.m I still like Lewis and own him in a couple leagues but A zebra doesn't change his stripes.
This is the correct answer here. As a Lewis owner, if anyone can figure out the man in the hoodie, please let me know when I should bench Lewis?

kthxbye
The Jets have a solid run defense and an even better pass defense so that seems to me Lewis is the play next week with a lot of dump offs to him. Just a guess though.

 
Since Blount came back in standard scoring leagues:

Blount - 26, 7, 22

Lewis - 12, 14, 3

As a Blount owner I'm looking at him as a boom/bust RB2 moving forward. Still not sure what to think about Lewis in standard.

Coming off a few monster weeks, I'm trying to move him as I'm not interested in trying to figure out BB's backfield plans every week...

 
Since Blount came back in standard scoring leagues:

Blount - 26, 7, 22

Lewis - 12, 14, 3

As a Blount owner I'm looking at him as a boom/bust RB2 moving forward. Still not sure what to think about Lewis in standard.

Coming off a few monster weeks, I'm trying to move him as I'm not interested in trying to figure out BB's backfield plans every week...
I wouldn't try and move either rb. I'd rather have a 20% chance of scoring a TD on a team that scores 5 a game vs a 40% chace on a team that scores 2 a game.

 
pyite76 said:
Pipes said:
Again nothing has changed with Belichek. Certain matchups are going to favor the power back and tonight is one of those nights.m I still like Lewis and own him in a couple leagues but A zebra doesn't change his stripes.
This is the correct answer here. As a Lewis owner, if anyone can figure out the man in the hoodie, please let me know when I should bench Lewis?

kthxbye
But yesterday wasn't a "Blount game". Belichick didn't favor his power back. Dion Lewis was used in exactly the same way in his dud against Indianapolis as he was used in his other four great games to start the season. He played 60-70% of New England's snaps until the game was out of reach, finished third on the team in targets with six, and ran the ball on 10-20% of his snaps. That's pretty much been his season in a nutshell. It's just that this week it didn't work and the other weeks it did.

Blount balled out on his limited snaps. The team ran 60+% of the time when he was on the field, just like they have been doing for weeks. He took one of his six first-half carries 38 yards for a touchdown. He caught his second pass of the entire season, (on his second target of the entire season), on a play where everyone else was covered, Tom Brady scrambled around to buy time, and eventually found Blount as his fourth or fifth read for a touchdown.

That doesn't mean it was a "Blount game", any more than this was a "Jeremy Hill game". Hill, like Blount, was just the lesser part of a relatively liberal rotation who happened to make the most of his opportunities.

I mean, I feel like at this point we know exactly who Lewis and Blount are. Lewis is the guy who is going to be getting 60-70% of the snaps until his team enters "run out the clock" mode. He's going to be among the team leaders in targets and a very safe bet for 6+ a game. He's going to get a carry on perhaps 20% of his snaps, and spend a lot of his time split out wide.

Blount is the guy who will come in as a change of pace, registering around a third of New England's snaps while the game is still in doubt. He's going to get a carry on 60-70% of his snaps, and he's probably going to do pretty well with them, because New England's rushing offense is really good, (and has been for quite a while). And then, when the game is out of reach for the other team, Blount is going to spend most of the 4th quarter taking handoffs to run down the rest of the clock.

This week didn't mark the slightest bit of deviation from that formula. Both backs were who they were. Blount was just a lot more productive in his role.

 
Look at it this way. Amendola had 7-105 while Edelman had 6-50, Gronk 3-50. Do we expect Amendola to out catch Gronk and Edelman the rest of the way?

It just happens.

 
I'm not worried about Lewis. Usage indicates that he'll have a great shot to bounce back. It was always going to be a hard game for him. He needed to out up fantasy points early or he wasn't going to put up any. We all thought the game would get out of hand and then it's Blount time.

I think the pats will go back to the tape and adjust their game plan going forward. They obviously trust Lewis to block but I think they'll make a concerted effort to get him more involved. Until that big Blount run, the pats had nothing on the ground and it showed in how hard the pass rush was. They'll address it.

Ppr, Lewis still looks like a low rb1 to me. You probably got him off the wire just like I did so let's stay positive about him. Standard, reliable rb2.

 
Right. I'm not that worried about this game. It did suck that I could've really used a good game from him this week, but it happens and I don't expect many more games to go like this for him. Not sure if he took himself out or what, but I'd think 90% of the time Lewis gets that 2nd TD Blount scored.

 
ESPN Boston's Mike Reiss believes Dion Lewis' abdominal issue was a factor in Sunday's quiet performance.
Lewis touched the ball only seven times, generating a modest 39 yards. If there's good news, it's that he appears to have avoided any setbacks. Lewis should be in for a bigger role against the Jets' tough run defense in Week 7, and remains an upside RB2.
 
ESPN Boston's Mike Reiss believes Dion Lewis' abdominal issue was a factor in Sunday's quiet performance.
Lewis touched the ball only seven times, generating a modest 39 yards. If there's good news, it's that he appears to have avoided any setbacks. Lewis should be in for a bigger role against the Jets' tough run defense in Week 7, and remains an upside RB2.
Hope that was the case. Like many others, love to see Lewis still being involved heavily in snaps and targets. Problem was his output, and his 50% target-to-catch ratio, as well as reception yardage, was a step change from all games previously. His YPC was still a healthy 5.25, but again the lowest amount of carries by a good margin, even if the situation/script called for more usage of Blount.

Everyone has an off-day; hoping that it was simply that, and that the way BB and NE uses Lewis doesn't change. No reason to think it will, but always something that you think about when you see Blount being effective both on the ground and in a scoring passing situation.

 
pyite76 said:
Pipes said:
Again nothing has changed with Belichek. Certain matchups are going to favor the power back and tonight is one of those nights.m I still like Lewis and own him in a couple leagues but A zebra doesn't change his stripes.
This is the correct answer here. As a Lewis owner, if anyone can figure out the man in the hoodie, please let me know when I should bench Lewis?

kthxbye
But yesterday wasn't a "Blount game". Belichick didn't favor his power back. Dion Lewis was used in exactly the same way in his dud against Indianapolis as he was used in his other four great games to start the season. He played 60-70% of New England's snaps until the game was out of reach, finished third on the team in targets with six, and ran the ball on 10-20% of his snaps. That's pretty much been his season in a nutshell. It's just that this week it didn't work and the other weeks it did.

Blount balled out on his limited snaps. The team ran 60+% of the time when he was on the field, just like they have been doing for weeks. He took one of his six first-half carries 38 yards for a touchdown. He caught his second pass of the entire season, (on his second target of the entire season), on a play where everyone else was covered, Tom Brady scrambled around to buy time, and eventually found Blount as his fourth or fifth read for a touchdown.

That doesn't mean it was a "Blount game", any more than this was a "Jeremy Hill game". Hill, like Blount, was just the lesser part of a relatively liberal rotation who happened to make the most of his opportunities.

I mean, I feel like at this point we know exactly who Lewis and Blount are. Lewis is the guy who is going to be getting 60-70% of the snaps until his team enters "run out the clock" mode. He's going to be among the team leaders in targets and a very safe bet for 6+ a game. He's going to get a carry on perhaps 20% of his snaps, and spend a lot of his time split out wide.

Blount is the guy who will come in as a change of pace, registering around a third of New England's snaps while the game is still in doubt. He's going to get a carry on 60-70% of his snaps, and he's probably going to do pretty well with them, because New England's rushing offense is really good, (and has been for quite a while). And then, when the game is out of reach for the other team, Blount is going to spend most of the 4th quarter taking handoffs to run down the rest of the clock.

This week didn't mark the slightest bit of deviation from that formula. Both backs were who they were. Blount was just a lot more productive in his role.
Saying it was a "Blount game" was probably a poor choice of words. However Blount is more than an after thought in this offense like many posters were implying after Lewis' hot start. In PPR in doesn't appear to make as much of a difference but in a standard league Lewis isn't nearly as intriguing. The nice thing though is the amount the Pats pass seems to indicate these snap count percentages will continue to hold true.

 
Pipes said:
Saying it was a "Blount game" was probably a poor choice of words. However Blount is more than an after thought in this offense like many posters were implying after Lewis' hot start. In PPR in doesn't appear to make as much of a difference but in a standard league Lewis isn't nearly as intriguing. The nice thing though is the amount the Pats pass seems to indicate these snap count percentages will continue to hold true.
Agreed on all counts. :hifive:

 
My guess is a Blount game is against easier ranked defenses vs the rush. Why? I don't know yet. Maybe they're slower. The result is less opportunity for Lewis in those games to keep him fresher against the more difficult defenses.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top