Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Do Le'veon Bell's previous suspensions hurt his contract demands? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Jed
- Start date
Jed
Footballguy
Godsbrother
Footballguy
It certainly did as far as the Steelers were concerned.
Jed
Footballguy
fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
Obviously they do.
Do character flaws hurt your employability?
What's this about? I have Conner, is it over in 2 or 3 weeks?
Do character flaws hurt your employability?
What's this about? I have Conner, is it over in 2 or 3 weeks?
Steelers4Life
Footballguy
They may not matter to whoever breaks the bank for him next year, but they definitely impacted his ability to get one from the Steelers in 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Long Ball Larry
Footballguy
i'm not sure that it would for the Steelers because they don't give much guaranteed money anyway and structure everything as roster bonuses for each year, right? so at worst, they would eat a partial year's salary?
Godsbrother
Footballguy
It kept the Steelers from even offering Bell a long term contract when he was still on his rookie deal. At the time when they would have been negotiating an extension Bell had been suspended twice. Instead they decided to wait for a full season of clean testing.
rockaction
Footballguy
I don't care about the new thread. It'll sink to the bottom if it's not worth the energy.
Voted yes. Would seem to be that more so than a monetary investment, a cap investment demands you want him on the field as management.
Voted yes. Would seem to be that more so than a monetary investment, a cap investment demands you want him on the field as management.
steelers1080
Footballguy
Yes. Obviously.
msudaisy26
Footballguy
Nope.
The CBA has so many protections built in for the teams that if he failed another test they could void his deal.
His suspensions were for possession and missed drug tests. Stupid things that immature or young kids do. The Steelers are around him all the time. They realize he made the mistake, but has grown up.
The things that hurt Bell's contract negotiations were the limited cap room the Steelers have and the deflated running back market from previous years. Until this year Bell was the only elite back not on a rookie deal.
The CBA has so many protections built in for the teams that if he failed another test they could void his deal.
His suspensions were for possession and missed drug tests. Stupid things that immature or young kids do. The Steelers are around him all the time. They realize he made the mistake, but has grown up.
The things that hurt Bell's contract negotiations were the limited cap room the Steelers have and the deflated running back market from previous years. Until this year Bell was the only elite back not on a rookie deal.
rockaction
Footballguy
rockaction
Footballguy
That sounds wrong, though I could be really mistaken. I hope msudaisy follows that up.
msudaisy26
Footballguy
The fact a team can cut a player at any time and never pay him again. All these contracts have clauses in them that can void the contract if they abuse substances, do any type of risky behavior like ride motor cycles or play basketball in the off season and get hurt.
Last edited by a moderator:
msudaisy26
Footballguy
rockaction
Footballguy
Yeah, I guess, but there's a cap hit, isn't there? For years down the line, too, if the money is guaranteed. I think we need a capologist here to break down contract structures like Henry did in the Brady thread. I'm just spitballing.
rockaction
Footballguy
msudaisy26
Footballguy
When Aaron Hernandez went to jail the Pats either quit paying his signing bonus or tried to recoup it. I don't remember if they got it. Calvin Johnson retired and had to give back like 1.5 million of a signing bonus.
msudaisy26
Footballguy
rockaction
Footballguy
I think it's way more complicated than that. According to over the cap, they've (The Steelers) saved cap money by him holding out. That seems to be the standard refrain here, too. He's got no dead cap money right now. He's not costing the Steelers a thing. If he's suspended under contract, he costs a team money.
I think we need a cap guy in here, but I'm almost positive this is the case, msudaisy.
From 24/7 Sports (this is prorated):
Assuming Bell misses Week 3, that will have saved the Steelers around $2.57 million in cap space.
If Bell doesn't return before Week 8, the Steelers will have saved around $6.84 million in cap space. This is relevant because the NFL's trade deadline is on October 30th, the Tuesday after Week 8's slate of games. The Steelers would therefore have almost $7 million in extra cap space to use at the trade deadline if they so chose.
If Bell returns in time for Week 12, the absolute latest he could rejoin the team and still earn an accrued season of service time and become a free agent next year, the Steelers will have saved approximately $9.41 million under the cap.
If Bell skips the entire season, which is enormously unlikely for a variety of different reasons, the Steelers would save the entire $14.5 million he is owed.
The Steelers entered the season with around $6 million in space, and then created a fair bit more when they restructured the contract of Cam Heyward. That essentially means that if they want to add another player in-season, the savings Bell is generating would allow them to acquire virtually any non-quarterback in football. If they didn't use that space this season, it would still have value as NFL teams are allowed to roll unused cap space over into the next season.
Last edited by a moderator:
msudaisy26
Footballguy
I was vague, but my point is they had to save 14.5 million to pay him when he showed up. That money could be used on other players if they didn't tie it to Bell with the tag. If he was suspended it would be the same thing. Cap money tied up for a player you aren't paying and isn't playing for you.
Last edited by a moderator:
rockaction
Footballguy
Can't they use it for other players before the trading deadline, etc., or those who are involved in negotiations internally for extensions? Can't they sign free agents with that cap space?
I'm genuinely asking.
Steelers4Life
Footballguy
It's ludicrous to think that they didn't hurt him.
In a long term team, Bell wanted guaranteed money that wasn't at risk of anything. He's said it any times, and if that wasn't the case, he'd have signed the offer before the 2017 season that would've given him $30M in the first two years. But during the years when the Steelers could have offered him a long term deal more to his liking, he was serving suspensions, twice. That's not going to earn you that kind of contract with the Steelers.
The Steelers made the CHOICE to offer Brown a contract in 2017 instead of Bell. Why? Because Bell had been suspended twice the previous two years and hadn't earned it. Brown had. Prior to that, the Steelers had the room to sign him but they chose not to. Once Brown signed, it was no longer a real option, but they didn't pursue that kind of deal with Bell.
In a long term team, Bell wanted guaranteed money that wasn't at risk of anything. He's said it any times, and if that wasn't the case, he'd have signed the offer before the 2017 season that would've given him $30M in the first two years. But during the years when the Steelers could have offered him a long term deal more to his liking, he was serving suspensions, twice. That's not going to earn you that kind of contract with the Steelers.
The Steelers made the CHOICE to offer Brown a contract in 2017 instead of Bell. Why? Because Bell had been suspended twice the previous two years and hadn't earned it. Brown had. Prior to that, the Steelers had the room to sign him but they chose not to. Once Brown signed, it was no longer a real option, but they didn't pursue that kind of deal with Bell.
msudaisy26
Footballguy
They offered him 30 million guaranteed when he would get almost 27 million guaranteed by using the franchise tag and almost guarantee his free agency in 2019. So 3 million extra in guarantees for 3 more years of being locked into a contract that the Steelers wouldn't redo until before the last year. (Your words in the other thread)
They went cheap,(Cheap is a relative term here, yes 30 million is a lot of money, but in the context of everything we know, it is being cheap) whether it was because they devalue the running back, or it is the cap problems they have. It had very little if anything to do with the suspensions for possession and a missed drug test. (At least you dropped the it is because he was late for a walk through and game prep for the Jags game excuse, which according to reports was excused by Tomlin)
Also this stuff about they can only pay Ben and Brown and not afford a 3rd guy is crap. Other teams do it and Ben's cap hit isn't even that big compared to a lot of qb's. He is 23 million which ranks him some where between 7 and 11. Plus teams get cute with the cap all the time, why didn't the Steelers? Because their plan was to low ball Bell and if he didn't take the offer they would just franchise him for 2 years and run him into the ground. They tried to go cheap and it is burning them. They have a win now team, yes their defense sucks, but a good running game can help hide some of that. Ben is getting up there, Brown is 30, Bell only has a couple years left of prime and they wasted a year trying to be cheap instead of trying to manipulate the cap, like a lot of teams do.
Steelers4Life
Footballguy
I'm not getting into the same stupid #### with you in a different thread. Your mind is made up whether you're right or wrong, and I'm not going there with you anymore.
rockaction
Footballguy
How can you be cheap when it's built into the CBA and you've maxed out your cap?
THAT CAN'T BE.
CAN I SCREAM
THAT CAN'T BE.
CAN I SCREAM
Last edited by a moderator:
msudaisy26
Footballguy
They had almost 20 million in cap space. 14.5 for Bell and about 5 million unused. They could have easily offered a 4 or 5 year deal worth 14 or 15 million a season with 40 to 45 guaranteed and front loaded part of it so the cap was bigger in 2018 when they had 20 million in space vs. future years when they had less space.
Franknbeans
Footballguy
msudaisy26
Footballguy
I seen the Lions do it with Calvin, Suh, and Stafford like 4 years ago. They made the playoffs too. The Broncos won a super bowl paying Peyton, and few other guys big money. Talib and DT maybe? Or Ward.
Last edited by a moderator:
Franknbeans
Footballguy
once?
msudaisy26
Footballguy
I am sure there are other examples. Those were off the top of my head. Plus it is the Lions, making the playoffs is their super bowl. I believe they made it twice. Seriously what are comparing it with? Ben is old they have a limited window anyways and most likely wasted a year away being cheap and not guaranteeing more money.
Last edited by a moderator:
msudaisy26
Footballguy
Jed
Footballguy
ObtuseBecause we have so many Steeler insiders here and people that are close friends with Bell and clients of his agent.
msudaisy26
Footballguy
TheFanatic
Footballguy
This.
Any team that signs him will have multiple clauses in the contract that if he gets suspended, they will recoup a bunch of money if not be able to void the deal entirely or both.
Godsbrother
Footballguy
The Steelers had to restructure some deals to get that cap space. Take a look at the cap hit of some of their stars next season: their top 6 players have a cap hit of close to $90 million. Signing Bell to a guaranteed long term deal was going to be an issue as soon as next season.
Again where they screwed up was not trying to negotiate a deal before the season with a team willing to give Bell the $17 million/season and guaranteed cash he was looking for .
rockaction
Footballguy
Those are:
- Notoriously difficult to enforce in court, should Bell sue to recoup that money
- Possibly illegal under the CBA
- Something Bell won't likely be amenable to signing
Vague poll. Teams have shown time and time again they will pay good players that are bad people off the field, pot suspensions are barely anything in this day and age and would not put someone in the category of "bad." Did it hurt his negotiations with Pittsburgh in the past? Possibly. With his next team? Not likely. He's been clean multiple years, by all reports is out of the program, and the stigma on pot decreases every day.
The teams negotiating with him may try to have a carve out in his new contract negating guaranteed money or forcing a payback of some sort if he gets suspended again, but I highly doubt it affects the amount of money they'll be willing to offer once he hits FA.
The teams negotiating with him may try to have a carve out in his new contract negating guaranteed money or forcing a payback of some sort if he gets suspended again, but I highly doubt it affects the amount of money they'll be willing to offer once he hits FA.
TheFanatic
Footballguy
1 - Not if he signs the contract - It's very difficult to object to a clause that you sign your name to.
2 - Morals clauses are not illegal under the CBA
3 - "Listen, Leveon, if you want this much money, we need assurances you aren't going to relapse. If you can't give us assurances, that tells us you are not willing to be a professional here and don't garner this crap ton of cash we are willing to give you, but only if you bind yourself in writing to not getting suspended again."
None of this is that hard.
rockaction
Footballguy
One would think the bolded is true, and it makes sense, but it's not necessarily the case.
Morals clauses are really, really notoriously tough to enforce.
The third is hard to argue with and I thought of that counterargument while I was typing (I was just making a point and didn't want to immediately contradict myself. His refusal to sign something like that tells one something.)
Similar threads
