bostonfred
Footballguy
It seems like the prevailing wisdom is that use of PEDs is big in the nfl. I'm interested in this for a couple of reasons. To me, it doesn't really matter if guys are willing to take a risk to improve. Every time they get on the field, they take a health risk. If you were the one guy on the field who didn't take HGH, you'd get killed.
I do care about the kids, I guess. A lot of the high school and college kids who try to get a leg up by using PEDs early will never make the NFL, and it doesn't seem right to me that kids who refuse to take them will take a back seat to the guys who do. But I think there's an obligation in the ncaa to test for PEDs and keep the kids safe. That doesn't seem like the nfl's role.
But thats all been discussed ad nauseum. There's a real football effect that doesn't seem to be discussed very often. I don't want to suggest anyone is using performance enhancers, because I have no reason to suspect them. But imagine if a guy like chris johnson used PEDs, and got fast before his pro day. Then he continued to use them, and ran for 2k yards. Then he stopped using them, because he didn't want to risk his big contract on rumors or a possible test. Then he sucked for the first half of the year as he cycled back on, and finished the season a little stronger. Then word comes out that he got bigger and stronger in the offseason, and is running stronger than he did in his 2k season.
Again, im not saying he did anything wrong - people have talked about needing to get into nfl game shape before, and while in some cases that may be a euphamism for needing to get back on the juice, there is certainly no reason to think that a guy like johnson needed anything more than to get into game shape. But it does raise the question: if you suspected that a player, whoever it might be, were juicing, or were forced to quit the juice, or was likely to start juicing for some reason, would it impact your opinion of them? Their fantasy value? Your fandom?
I do care about the kids, I guess. A lot of the high school and college kids who try to get a leg up by using PEDs early will never make the NFL, and it doesn't seem right to me that kids who refuse to take them will take a back seat to the guys who do. But I think there's an obligation in the ncaa to test for PEDs and keep the kids safe. That doesn't seem like the nfl's role.
But thats all been discussed ad nauseum. There's a real football effect that doesn't seem to be discussed very often. I don't want to suggest anyone is using performance enhancers, because I have no reason to suspect them. But imagine if a guy like chris johnson used PEDs, and got fast before his pro day. Then he continued to use them, and ran for 2k yards. Then he stopped using them, because he didn't want to risk his big contract on rumors or a possible test. Then he sucked for the first half of the year as he cycled back on, and finished the season a little stronger. Then word comes out that he got bigger and stronger in the offseason, and is running stronger than he did in his 2k season.
Again, im not saying he did anything wrong - people have talked about needing to get into nfl game shape before, and while in some cases that may be a euphamism for needing to get back on the juice, there is certainly no reason to think that a guy like johnson needed anything more than to get into game shape. But it does raise the question: if you suspected that a player, whoever it might be, were juicing, or were forced to quit the juice, or was likely to start juicing for some reason, would it impact your opinion of them? Their fantasy value? Your fandom?