packersfan
Footballguy
Let me preface the following by saying I'm not a big fan of Dominic Rhodes. I'm not a Rhodes owner and at this time he's not someone I'm targeting for my team in 2006. All that being said I'm starting to wonder if he could turn out to be this year's version Mike Anderson:
In other words a "starter" who ends up being the main guy in his team's running attack for the entire (or at least the bulk of the) season.
Last year, Anderson had a huge camp and emerged as the Broncos' Week 1 starter. Many people at the time assumed it would just be a matter of time before Anderson wore down and/or Tatum Bell took over. That never happened. While Bell had some moments, Anderson remained the starter and became one of 2006's best value picks (especially if you drafted earlier in the summer).
This year, Rhodes will enter camp as the Colts' starting RB. First-round pick Joseph Addai is waiting in the wings and many people are assuming it will just be a matter of time before Addai wins the job. But who's to say it won't remain a time share the entire season? Like Anderson, Rhodes isn't a dynamic RB and like Anderson his best season came prior to a major injury. Many of the things people said about Anderson are now being said about Rhodes.
But like Anderson, Rhodes is dependable. He knows the system (a huge advantage at the present time over Addai) and if he proves to be someone the Colts can put on the field and trust -- as was the case last season with Anderson -- it may not matter what Addai does. The good news for Rhodes is outside of Addai there's really no competition for carries. So it will come down to one of them or (as Polian has said) both handline the carries in the backfield. The running game is a major question for the Colts obviously with Edge gone. In fact, their attempt to make it to the Super Bowl could hinge on the production they get at that position. If Rhodes has a good camp and shows he can be trusted and can perform at no worse than a solid level I wouldn't be surprised if, like Anderson in 2005, he ended up getting the bulk of the carries in the Indy backfield this season.
Just some food for thought.
In other words a "starter" who ends up being the main guy in his team's running attack for the entire (or at least the bulk of the) season.
Last year, Anderson had a huge camp and emerged as the Broncos' Week 1 starter. Many people at the time assumed it would just be a matter of time before Anderson wore down and/or Tatum Bell took over. That never happened. While Bell had some moments, Anderson remained the starter and became one of 2006's best value picks (especially if you drafted earlier in the summer).
This year, Rhodes will enter camp as the Colts' starting RB. First-round pick Joseph Addai is waiting in the wings and many people are assuming it will just be a matter of time before Addai wins the job. But who's to say it won't remain a time share the entire season? Like Anderson, Rhodes isn't a dynamic RB and like Anderson his best season came prior to a major injury. Many of the things people said about Anderson are now being said about Rhodes.
But like Anderson, Rhodes is dependable. He knows the system (a huge advantage at the present time over Addai) and if he proves to be someone the Colts can put on the field and trust -- as was the case last season with Anderson -- it may not matter what Addai does. The good news for Rhodes is outside of Addai there's really no competition for carries. So it will come down to one of them or (as Polian has said) both handline the carries in the backfield. The running game is a major question for the Colts obviously with Edge gone. In fact, their attempt to make it to the Super Bowl could hinge on the production they get at that position. If Rhodes has a good camp and shows he can be trusted and can perform at no worse than a solid level I wouldn't be surprised if, like Anderson in 2005, he ended up getting the bulk of the carries in the Indy backfield this season.
Just some food for thought.
Last edited by a moderator: