Seymour Corn
it=info
It`s on right now. Should I tape it
forgetaboutit...yes.It`s on right now. Should I tape it
w/ commercials and censorship it's not going to be as good.i'd rent or wait for it to be on HBO.HISTORY TELEVISIONHBO?
or network tv?
They don't censor much. Especially after 9.w/ commercials and censorship it's not going to be as good.i'd rent or wait for it to be on HBO.HISTORY TELEVISIONHBO?
or network tv?
huhin that case.. if you can stand the commercial breaks.. go for it.They don't censor much. Especially after 9.w/ commercials and censorship it's not going to be as good.i'd rent or wait for it to be on HBO.HISTORY TELEVISIONHBO?
or network tv?
I`m all in.My 3/4 inch reel-to-reel is rolling.huhin that case.. if you can stand the commercial breaks.. go for it.They don't censor much. Especially after 9.w/ commercials and censorship it's not going to be as good.i'd rent or wait for it to be on HBO.HISTORY TELEVISIONHBO?
or network tv?
There is also a book which was written by the FBI agent Depp portrays in the movie that is AMAZING, talks about the nuances (sp?) of being in the mob, ex. behavior at dinner, how to keep a side women, lack of any shame. Just a great read overall.Not bad, great performances. If you like Depp or Pacino remotely(how can you not?) I'd watch it. If you like both in the least, must see.The book is incredible, obviously more in depth and better.
Possibly top 10 for me.....more likely top 15It`s on right now. Should I tape it
i thought this flick took the veneer off the mob pretty well. it doesn't glorify or romanticize the mob really. i enjoyed it quite a bit.
Agreed. It was also the only film in recent memory where Pacino isn't playing AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!!. I've gotten to where I don't enjoy his movies anymore when he's in AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!! mode. I watched Godfather II the other day & was amazed (again) at how low-key he was compared to what we have now. And, while not quite as bad, both Nicholson & DeNiro are getting to AL PACINO!!!!!!!!-land to me.i thought this flick took the veneer off the mob pretty well. it doesn't glorify or romanticize the mob really. i enjoyed it quite a bit.![]()
awesomelyUruk-Hai said:Agreed. It was also the only film in recent memory where Pacino isn't playing AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!!. I've gotten to where I don't enjoy his movies anymore when he's in AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!! mode. I watched Godfather II the other day & was amazed (again) at how low-key he was compared to what we have now. And, while not quite as bad, both Nicholson & DeNiro are getting to AL PACINO!!!!!!!!-land to me.i thought this flick took the veneer off the mob pretty well. it doesn't glorify or romanticize the mob really. i enjoyed it quite a bit.![]()
Good call on Serpico.I have to admit to hypocrisy, though. John Wayne did the same thing (played himself in every movie) & it doesn't bother me nearly as much. Part of it, I know, is that Pacino is so damned shrill anymore & he overacts like crazy (the Duke underacted if anything - especially later in his career, Rooster Cogburn notwithstanding) - that combo just doesn't appeal to me. Nicholson & DeNiro pretty much just play the same guy in most of their films anymore, but aren't quite as irritating as our boy Al.awesomelyUruk-Hai said:Agreed. It was also the only film in recent memory where Pacino isn't playing AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!!. I've gotten to where I don't enjoy his movies anymore when he's in AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!! mode. I watched Godfather II the other day & was amazed (again) at how low-key he was compared to what we have now. And, while not quite as bad, both Nicholson & DeNiro are getting to AL PACINO!!!!!!!!-land to me.i thought this flick took the veneer off the mob pretty well. it doesn't glorify or romanticize the mob really. i enjoyed it quite a bit.![]()
just watched serpico and was amazed at the difference from mid 70's pacino to current AL PACINO!!!111!!!!OMGWTFBBQ!
See Kevin Costner.Good call on Serpico.I have to admit to hypocrisy, though. John Wayne did the same thing (played himself in every movie) & it doesn't bother me nearly as much. Part of it, I know, is that Pacino is so damned shrill anymore & he overacts like crazy (the Duke underacted if anything - especially later in his career, Rooster Cogburn notwithstanding) - that combo just doesn't appeal to me. Nicholson & DeNiro pretty much just play the same guy in most of their films anymore, but aren't quite as irritating as our boy Al.awesomelyUruk-Hai said:Agreed. It was also the only film in recent memory where Pacino isn't playing AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!!. I've gotten to where I don't enjoy his movies anymore when he's in AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!! mode. I watched Godfather II the other day & was amazed (again) at how low-key he was compared to what we have now. And, while not quite as bad, both Nicholson & DeNiro are getting to AL PACINO!!!!!!!!-land to me.i thought this flick took the veneer off the mob pretty well. it doesn't glorify or romanticize the mob really. i enjoyed it quite a bit.![]()
just watched serpico and was amazed at the difference from mid 70's pacino to current AL PACINO!!!111!!!!OMGWTFBBQ!
Costner isn't deified as an Actor like Pacino, Nicholson, or Deniro though (neither was Wayne for that matter).See Kevin Costner.Good call on Serpico.I have to admit to hypocrisy, though. John Wayne did the same thing (played himself in every movie) & it doesn't bother me nearly as much. Part of it, I know, is that Pacino is so damned shrill anymore & he overacts like crazy (the Duke underacted if anything - especially later in his career, Rooster Cogburn notwithstanding) - that combo just doesn't appeal to me. Nicholson & DeNiro pretty much just play the same guy in most of their films anymore, but aren't quite as irritating as our boy Al.awesomelyUruk-Hai said:Agreed. It was also the only film in recent memory where Pacino isn't playing AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!!. I've gotten to where I don't enjoy his movies anymore when he's in AL PACINO!!!!!!!!!! mode. I watched Godfather II the other day & was amazed (again) at how low-key he was compared to what we have now. And, while not quite as bad, both Nicholson & DeNiro are getting to AL PACINO!!!!!!!!-land to me.i thought this flick took the veneer off the mob pretty well. it doesn't glorify or romanticize the mob really. i enjoyed it quite a bit.![]()
just watched serpico and was amazed at the difference from mid 70's pacino to current AL PACINO!!!111!!!!OMGWTFBBQ!
Accurate. Entertaining movie, but not nearly in the same class as those other mob flicks.This is a solid mob movie
Goodfellas/Casino/Godfather > Donnie Brasco but thats about it in the genre.
Finally agree with this guy.Def not even near Goodfellas and Godfather but it's right there with Casino imo.
Donnie Brasco is one of the most compelling true stories ever told, Casino is just fodder. It's a poor-man's Goodfellas on a really good day.I think you two would be in the minority. Casino crushes Brasco, IMO.
Yup. Casino and Brasco are in the same league.Finally agree with this guy.Def not even near Goodfellas and Godfather but it's right there with Casino imo.