To the extent he is rosterable? PPR, yes, decent bye week filler if you catch the heads week. Tails and you might get stuck with 2 or 3 point game. I said heads or tails because it seems like a coin flip is as good of indicator as anything else that T-Jax was about to put up 300+ last weekend - and it's worth noting that was a career high. Baldwin had a nice catch and run 55 yard TD week one, and another productive game this week. In between were a couple stinkers. Partly that is being an inconsistent rookie, but mostly it's an offense that already has a couple established vets who will start if healthy.I understand the Seattle WRs thusly: Rice - #1, BMW - #2, Baldwin - #3A, Obomanu - #3B. That's football wise. I think fantasy wise, it's WR2 with upside, WR2/WR3, WR4/WR5, WR4/WR5. The QB play is def a limiting factor.I like the Baldwin story. Steve Smith-type frame. Hard worker, lost his starting job before his senior year, won it back week 1, tremendous year as Luck's favorite target. Undrafted, had a great camp, coaches were really impressed with his route running and ability to pick up the offense quickly. He was also praised for his quickness off the line; not a blinding speed guy who will get behind everyone, but someone who can quickly get separation from the slot.Redraft, limited upside this year, but keep your ear to the ground. He's the kind of guy who could keep improving, or go elsewhere and get an opportunity.'Routilla said:Does anyone else think this guy could be a sleeper going forward as S. Rice starts commanding better coverage?
Quick, good hands, nice slot receiver catch & run WR screen type guy. Rice was getting doubled a lot. Whitehurst looked pretty bad at times, so I wonder how much he'll do this year, but def a great bye week filler in redraft, hold & hope in dynasty. Kid looked impressive in preseason as well. Really like him a lot long term.Any more insight from someone who watched this game today? I stashed this guy in 3 dynasty leagues a few weeks ago, and he's outscoring my WR3s in 2 of them.
And the yards?Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
They'd be called back along with the TDAnd the yards?Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
Aikman went over this during the game. He initially said that was the case but on review he changed his mind and said the DBs bit on the play fake. I didn't really pay attention to the replay to see, but Aikman reversed himself on this.eta: also not sure what you mean by disputed here. Challenged and reversed? Blown dead? Fluke? Flukes count, just like Cruz's TD.Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
You don't call back a TD for an offsides.They'd be called back along with the TDAnd the yards?Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
I meant the rest of his yards and all those receptions? Should we discount them too? TDs are hit or miss anyway, but that was a fine receiving day. No need to discount it because je caught a TD on a busted play.They'd be called back along with the TDAnd the yards?Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
Which wasn't actually busted.I meant the rest of his yards and all those receptions? Should we discount them too? TDs are hit or miss anyway, but that was a fine receiving day. No need to discount it because je caught a TD on a busted play.They'd be called back along with the TDAnd the yards?Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
I guess the best word is fluke. No way he is that open if the play is ran as scheduled. Still great game....just adding input.Aikman went over this during the game. He initially said that was the case but on review he changed his mind and said the DBs bit on the play fake. I didn't really pay attention to the replay to see, but Aikman reversed himself on this.eta: also not sure what you mean by disputed here. Challenged and reversed? Blown dead? Fluke? Flukes count, just like Cruz's TD.Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
He still wouldve had 7/109 without that catch though. Im intrigued by him, but his QB sucks, they have an above average #1WR, and he's 3rd on the depth chart. Seems too hit or miss to roster let alone consider starting.Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
I hope to revisit this in a few weeks when it becomes clear that CW can't read a defense, locks onto targets, has no touch on short throws and is every bit as average as TJ.Bye weeks and injuries forced me to start him in three dynasty leagues today...still shaking my head. Watched the game, as bad as Whitehurst looked at times, at other times he was making throws that TJax just cannot make, as a Seahawks homer I've been clamoring for Clipboard Jesus to replace him since we first signed Jackson/Rice. If he keeps the job, upgrade all your Hawks IMO.
Good breakdown here.Watched him a lot in college. He was always a pretty good athlete, but prior to last season he was a bit player for Stanford because his hands were suspect. He really stepped up last season and became a reliable WR who made spectacular catches in addition to all the routine stuff. I'm kinda "meh" on his dynasty potential though. He's not the biggest guy. His speed is okay, but certainly nothing special by NFL standards. I see him as kind of a lesser version of an Andre Roberts/Eddie Royal type. Having said that, he's getting on the field early and producing as an undrafted rookie. That's no small feat.
Well Aikman was mistaken. Whitehurst's post game comments mention how he saw the D stop after Osi jumped so he launched it(oops wrong reply to)I guess the best word is fluke. No way he is that open if the play is ran as scheduled. Still great game....just adding input.Aikman went over this during the game. He initially said that was the case but on review he changed his mind and said the DBs bit on the play fake. I didn't really pay attention to the replay to see, but Aikman reversed himself on this.eta: also not sure what you mean by disputed here. Challenged and reversed? Blown dead? Fluke? Flukes count, just like Cruz's TD.Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
When I saw the replay on halftime of SNF it looks like one guy on that side stopped because he bit on the fake and the ball was lauched over his head. Doesn't matter in the long run of the evaluation of his skills.Well Aikman was mistaken. Whitehurst's post game comments mention how he saw the D stop after Osi jumped so he launched it(oops wrong reply to)I guess the best word is fluke. No way he is that open if the play is ran as scheduled. Still great game....just adding input.Aikman went over this during the game. He initially said that was the case but on review he changed his mind and said the DBs bit on the play fake. I didn't really pay attention to the replay to see, but Aikman reversed himself on this.eta: also not sure what you mean by disputed here. Challenged and reversed? Blown dead? Fluke? Flukes count, just like Cruz's TD.Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
Doesn't mean he wouldn't have scored.I guess the best word is fluke. No way he is that open if the play is ran as scheduled. Still great game....just adding input.Aikman went over this during the game. He initially said that was the case but on review he changed his mind and said the DBs bit on the play fake. I didn't really pay attention to the replay to see, but Aikman reversed himself on this.eta: also not sure what you mean by disputed here. Challenged and reversed? Blown dead? Fluke? Flukes count, just like Cruz's TD.Should be noted that the touchdown could of been disputed. Defense jumped offsides and most gave up on the play leaving for a wide open reception.
Same here in one league on all counts. I grabbed him after week 1, started him this week due to byes, and unless Knox goes off tonight, I'll lose too. OK, so maybe it has more to do than just byes and the fact my team just plain blows in that league, but I started him and he looked great. Now time for him to disappear for three weeks...After seeing his TD in Week 1, I stashed on him on two teams with deep lineups, and because of byes, I had to start him in both this past week. Granted, I still lost both games (****!), but it was still nice to see.
I'm sure you're right, I remember cursing at Charlie more than once last season for playing as bad as TJ has been this season. I was really hoping to reunite Baldwin with his college QB next season but once again, Carrol has the Hawks overachieving.I hope to revisit this in a few weeks when it becomes clear that CW can't read a defense, locks onto targets, has no touch on short throws and is every bit as average as TJ.Bye weeks and injuries forced me to start him in three dynasty leagues today...still shaking my head. Watched the game, as bad as Whitehurst looked at times, at other times he was making throws that TJax just cannot make, as a Seahawks homer I've been clamoring for Clipboard Jesus to replace him since we first signed Jackson/Rice. If he keeps the job, upgrade all your Hawks IMO.
I don't think Luck was ever really on his radar, though I don't doubt he'd LOVE to use Harbaugh's boy against him twice a year. I figure he's angling for Barkley or even more ideally using the draft pick on a DL and getting Flynn (who GM Shneider drafted in GB) as a FA. However, with the rookie cap and their propensity for moves, trading up with a team that needs far more than a QB is possibly an option.Regardless, I like Baldwin. He reminds me of the DL Reed from a few years ago. Made the team by using his head and a high motor. Turns Tate and Butler (who started on the PUP after a gruesome broken leg last year), or even Obamanu who is a ST demon, into some middle level trade bait. I like the idea of Rice and Williams on the outside and Baldwin becoming a slot monster.I'm sure you're right, I remember cursing at Charlie more than once last season for playing as bad as TJ has been this season. I was really hoping to reunite Baldwin with his college QB next season but once again, Carrol has the Hawks overachieving.I hope to revisit this in a few weeks when it becomes clear that CW can't read a defense, locks onto targets, has no touch on short throws and is every bit as average as TJ.Bye weeks and injuries forced me to start him in three dynasty leagues today...still shaking my head. Watched the game, as bad as Whitehurst looked at times, at other times he was making throws that TJax just cannot make, as a Seahawks homer I've been clamoring for Clipboard Jesus to replace him since we first signed Jackson/Rice. If he keeps the job, upgrade all your Hawks IMO.
Never seemed to be able to get good routes down. Pretty good once the ball's in his hands.Golden Tate must really be a bust if everyone and their mother on that roster keeps playing ahead of him.
I'm disappointed by Tate's lack of explosiveness. I was expecting more. Also, I'm seeing Tate let the ball get into his body too often. I wish I saw him snatch the ball more with his hands.Baldwin is a keeper. I think he'll be a great asset moving forward, but I have doubts he'll be the #1 fantasy WR on this roster. I can see a scenario that results in Baldwin being the top fantasy producer (team loses a ton of games). I think if the coaching staff has their way Rice and Williams will be the top producers.Never seemed to be able to get good routes down. Pretty good once the ball's in his hands.Golden Tate must really be a bust if everyone and their mother on that roster keeps playing ahead of him.
I'd be willing to bet that's not what the numbers say.Baldwin is looking like everything I wish Tate would be... but isn't. I've parted ways.Never seemed to be able to get good routes down. Pretty good once the ball's in his hands.Golden Tate must really be a bust if everyone and their mother on that roster keeps playing ahead of him.
I'm not going off numbers, I'm going off what I've seen of him. I'll add "in space" to my statement. No one's going to get YAC when there's a defender on them as soon as the ball's there. If he were a better route runner, he'd get the ball in space more.I'd be willing to bet that's not what the numbers say.Baldwin is looking like everything I wish Tate would be... but isn't. I've parted ways.Never seemed to be able to get good routes down. Pretty good once the ball's in his hands.Golden Tate must really be a bust if everyone and their mother on that roster keeps playing ahead of him.
he was almost cut this summer, or rumored to be at least...ya know as much as we can call that factGolden Tate must really be a bust if everyone and their mother on that roster keeps playing ahead of him.
Should be easy this week.On Sunday, I find it difficult to start Baldwin. There's not a whole lot in his favor for a FF WDIS decision yet he does well.
bye no?Generally I don't expect their QB to throw for too many yards, there's Rice and a decent D and ...I should have, but I started him for like a 30 yard game and missed the rest. I have Detroit's rook WR on my FF bench too and...what do you think Sweeney? How do you predict much for these rookie "#2 WRs"?Should be easy this week.On Sunday, I find it difficult to start Baldwin. There's not a whole lot in his favor for a FF WDIS decision yet he does well.
Dunno much about Young. I've had both on my roster but had to drop them because of byes and short benches. I see Baldwin being pretty productive even as the #3. Carroll loves big guys on the ends so Williams will be back. But QBs love their slot monsters. edited to remove stupid rumor I misread.bye no?Generally I don't expect their QB to throw for too many yards, there's Rice and a decent D and ...I should have, but I started him for like a 30 yard game and missed the rest. I have Detroit's rook WR on my FF bench too and...what do you think Sweeney? How do you predict much for these rookie "#2 WRs"?Should be easy this week.On Sunday, I find it difficult to start Baldwin. There's not a whole lot in his favor for a FF WDIS decision yet he does well.
27.12; apparently he is overweight but I assume he is rather muscular. I take it that you don't care for his build and see him as a fluke; recent outings would say otherwise. He did post good numbers against NYG, and while they aren't playing lights out, they are pretty solid.What's his BMI?
Obamanu/M Williams play the same position so that'll be the question. Baldwin is the unquestioned slot receiver.This guy is really starting to rip it up, is his status still hinging on M. Williams return, or (as Mad Sweeney suggests) has he carved out a niche for himself? What about Obamanu; odd man out?
This was my premise used for starting this thread. Cheers!Obamanu/M Williams play the same position so that'll be the question. Baldwin is the unquestioned slot receiver.
in last weeks matchup podcast Cosell was very positively about himGreg Cosell graded him out as a 6th rounder coming out . . .