This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Why even respond if that's what you're going to say? He said that it was keep two. It's hard to say what round to take him in because we don't know your scoring or how RB heavy your draft will be. But I'd say you have to take him around RB20 if you want him.
No reason to be a tool.
JohnnyU's right on that one.I missed the keep two part in the opening post. That makes a big difference. I'd say the odds that you decide to keep Turner aren't great, especially if you're picking towards the end of the first round. He could have a bad year, get injured or not sign in a favorable situation. You will probably keep your first round pick this year, assuming he lives up to or near expectations. That leaves all your other rounds to find one keeper. Yes, there's a chance Turner is a first round pick in redraft years, but there's also a very good chance you won't keep him. I would not overpay for that chance.If you really want him, though, the LT owner is probably thinking 7.01.No reason to be a tool.
Sorry to be a tool. This is the kind of post/response that I'd expect from a mod. The earlier post was not.JohnnyU's right on that one.I missed the keep two part in the opening post. That makes a big difference. I'd say the odds that you decide to keep Turner aren't great, especially if you're picking towards the end of the first round. He could have a bad year, get injured or not sign in a favorable situation. You will probably keep your first round pick this year, assuming he lives up to or near expectations. That leaves all your other rounds to find one keeper. Yes, there's a chance Turner is a first round pick in redraft years, but there's also a very good chance you won't keep him. I would not overpay for that chance.If you really want him, though, the LT owner is probably thinking 7.01.No reason to be a tool.
I just took him at 10.1 in a keep 5 league.Sorry to be a tool. This is the kind of post/response that I'd expect from a mod. The earlier post was not.JohnnyU's right on that one.I missed the keep two part in the opening post. That makes a big difference. I'd say the odds that you decide to keep Turner aren't great, especially if you're picking towards the end of the first round. He could have a bad year, get injured or not sign in a favorable situation. You will probably keep your first round pick this year, assuming he lives up to or near expectations. That leaves all your other rounds to find one keeper. Yes, there's a chance Turner is a first round pick in redraft years, but there's also a very good chance you won't keep him. I would not overpay for that chance.If you really want him, though, the LT owner is probably thinking 7.01.No reason to be a tool.
I disagree. I am not in a full dynasty league, 6 keepers and I am planning to keep Turner as of today, because WHEN he becomes a starter in 2008, it is like payday having a good runningback for short dollars. If I throw him back his salary double's or triple's from what I paid last year.
In my keep 7 league, I can almost guarantee that Turner will be kept (the owner also has LT)
Less than one percent. They already turned down a first-rounder for him, and AJ said for teams not to call with any more offers; Turner is off the table and will be a Charger this year.
In most keeper league's I've played in, when you keep a player you forfeit the draft pick in the round he was originally selected in. If someone drafts Turner in the sixth or seventh round this year, and he'd be drafted in the first or second round next year, he's definitely a keeper. He's worth a lot more than a first-rounder who would go in the first round.
They will get a full year of his services. He is very useful in spelling Tomlinson, and probably the best insurance policy if a starting RB goes down. I wish the Chargers would have dealt him, but I understand why they have kept him.
They will also receive a compensatory pick for losing him as a free agent, which will likely be a 3rd round pick.LAUNCH
Thanks, MT.On the flip side, I would expect that the chances he is with S.D. next year is also about one percent, yes?
Yes, the only realistic way that might happen is if LT has a career-ending injury.
Thats about right 8-12 rds.dickey moe said:
Tonight in a redraft he went mid 8th round. I had the #1 & LT and planned on grabbing him at the 8.12/9.01 turn but was backdoored. I think he;ll go considerably earlier in a keeper.
If your really looking at the future then you dont take Norwood , cause in the future they will get the 1st pick ( 2008 ) overall and get their RB .I picked him up at 114 in a startup dynasty where you keep everyone (though it is contract based). I was already stocked at RB (Bush, Peterson, Norwood, Ahman Green) but couldn't pass him up that late. Couldn't believe he was still there and that I had missed him for that long (would have taken him about 90 if I saw him). In our contract based league, he will cost me $2 for the next 5 yearsI also got Norwood at 87 overall so I don't think anyone was looking much at the future. People in this league were also shocked when I picked AD with #14.
...and on the flip side, the team getting him is no lock to keep him, so why would they give up a draft pick to get him? :devil'sadvocate:
(as an NFL GM in need of a RB, I'd certainly entertain a 2nd day pick, but I don't think SD takes that)in my keep 4 (12 teamer), MT went 3.10, so 34+48=82 overall (=late 7th)Hmmm, I could have sworn there was another area of need that the Falcons need to address, but unfortunately, they're not in the news that often anymore
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
