I dont know the science behind it but there is no ####### way we could drain the suns energy in 300 years with a global grid of solar panels.
Without knowing anything about this scientifically, I'd say we may need to consider the source on that one.
lolI dont know the science behind it but there is no ####### way we could drain the suns energy in 300 years with a global grid of solar panels.
The idea is just ridiculous to begin with. Solar panels collect what comes down. What comes down doesnt get recycled back to the sun if its not collected anyway. How could us collecting more of what the sun sends in anyway affect how much it produces? Wtf is that guy even talking about?
Sorry didnt realize National Report was an onion clone. My apologies.lolI dont know the science behind it but there is no ####### way we could drain the suns energy in 300 years with a global grid of solar panels.The idea is just ridiculous to begin with. Solar panels collect what comes down. What comes down doesnt get recycled back to the sun if its not collected anyway. How could us collecting more of what the sun sends in anyway affect how much it produces? Wtf is that guy even talking about?
FavreCo Theory!Assuming these new technologies are cost effective, what do you think will be Big Oil's (Exxon-Mobil) response to such an initiative? They will not like being phased out. They will have to spend additional millions of dollars (out of many billions profit) to buy the necessary legislative votes to kill such an initiative. No?
For a moment, I thought the article was legit, but just dismissed it as hogwash anyway. Thanks for keeping me from making an idiot of myself.Sorry didnt realize National Report was an onion clone. My apologies.lolI dont know the science behind it but there is no ####### way we could drain the suns energy in 300 years with a global grid of solar panels.The idea is just ridiculous to begin with. Solar panels collect what comes down. What comes down doesnt get recycled back to the sun if its not collected anyway. How could us collecting more of what the sun sends in anyway affect how much it produces? Wtf is that guy even talking about?
Thats what I'm here for. I can be an idiot so you dont have too.Kal El said:For a moment, I thought the article was legit, but just dismissed it as hogwash anyway. Thanks for keeping me from making an idiot of myself.Insein said:Sorry didnt realize National Report was an onion clone. My apologies.SacramentoBob said:lolInsein said:I dont know the science behind it but there is no ####### way we could drain the suns energy in 300 years with a global grid of solar panels.The idea is just ridiculous to begin with. Solar panels collect what comes down. What comes down doesnt get recycled back to the sun if its not collected anyway. How could us collecting more of what the sun sends in anyway affect how much it produces? Wtf is that guy even talking about?joffer said:
gas grass ### or glass, nobody rides for free.I see this being a huge money drain for a very long time.
Thought this was another Breaking Bad thread.gas grass ### or glass, nobody rides for free.I see this being a huge money drain for a very long time.
I didn't know tazering flying objects was in the business model.Wonder how many birds this would end up frying.
You mean like the warmth of an asphalt road?Wouldn't the warmth of the panel attract animals to sleep and hang out on them?