they aren't cutting Haynes . . .You say Staley will not be cut but could the other 2 RBs be Cedric Humes and Patrick Cobbs?
Humes alraedy got cut.You say Staley will not be cut but could the other 2 RBs be Cedric Humes and Patrick Cobbs? If Cobbs and Humes are kept Duce is out.
ThanksHumes alraedy got cut.You say Staley will not be cut but could the other 2 RBs be Cedric Humes and Patrick Cobbs? If Cobbs and Humes are kept Duce is out.
sign him to the practice squad...Why did they cut the QB Jacobs?
He struggled in training camp, but I believe he's a lock for the practice squad if he clears waivers.Why did they cut the QB Jacobs?
I would love for the Cowboys to grab this guy.He struggled in training camp, but I believe he's a lock for the practice squad if he clears waivers.Why did they cut the QB Jacobs?
I know I wasn't at training camp, but Staley looked terrible in preseason. I'm shocked they kept him over Humes (or another prospect). Any homers surprised Staley made the roster?
Can they pull him back in if somebody claims him, like in MLB?I would love for the Cowboys to grab this guy.He struggled in training camp, but I believe he's a lock for the practice squad if he clears waivers.Why did they cut the QB Jacobs?
second that. Humes & Kuhn looked better. Bad moves by my Stillers.I know I wasn't at training camp, but Staley looked terrible in preseason. I'm shocked they kept him over Humes (or another prospect). Any homers surprised Staley made the roster?![]()
No, but once he's on the practice squad, the Steelers will have the option of putting him on the active roster if another team tries to sign him.Can they pull him back in if somebody claims him, like in MLB?I would love for the Cowboys to grab this guy.He struggled in training camp, but I believe he's a lock for the practice squad if he clears waivers.Why did they cut the QB Jacobs?
They should traded Staley, even for an Iron City & a bag of Beernuts, & kept both Kuhn & Humes. Cobb isn't that much of an improvement.If we are real lucky, they'll sign both to the practice squad. I got a bad feeling we will need both later this year.Nightshift, I completely agree that Kuhn should have made the team. He is a beast and would have done well on special teams, take the place of Kreider if necessary, and been able to run as a rb. Bad decision today. I hope he stays on to the practice squad again this year.
I was saying last week that I did not think Staley would be cut. The Steelers just did not feel comfortable having rookies backing up Parker & Haynes. It may seem weird but the #4 RB (Cobbs?) could see more playing time than Duce. Staley is simply an insurance policy in case of injury.I know I wasn't at training camp, but Staley looked terrible in preseason. I'm shocked they kept him over Humes (or another prospect). Any homers surprised Staley made the roster?
Haynes is the third down back and will likely spell FWP from time to time. What Cowher said was that whoever was in the game would probably not be pulled. So if Haynes is in giving Willie a break, then I guess he would stay in at the goal line.Do any of these backs project to steal goal-line from Fast Willie? I know the Chin has indicated that he will not pull FWP at the goal-line... do you believe him?
I just heard LB Andre Frazier and WR Quincy Morgan were cut.Last 2 cuts?
http://news.steelers.com/article/68642/I just heard LB Andre Frazier and WR Quincy Morgan were cut.Last 2 cuts?
Wow, that surprises me. I thought both of these guys would make it.I just heard LB Andre Frazier and WR Quincy Morgan were cut.Last 2 cuts?
I was saying last week that I did not think Staley would be cut. The Steelers just did not feel comfortable having rookies backing up Parker & Haynes. It may seem weird but the #4 RB (Cobbs?) could see more playing time than Duce. Staley is simply an insurance policy in case of injury.I know I wasn't at training camp, but Staley looked terrible in preseason. I'm shocked they kept him over Humes (or another prospect). Any homers surprised Staley made the roster?
exactly. Given Haynes' tendency to get hurt, you might see Cobbs move up sooner than later. Depends on how quickly he can pick up the offense.I was saying last week that I did not think Staley would be cut. The Steelers just did not feel comfortable having rookies backing up Parker & Haynes. It may seem weird but the #4 RB (Cobbs?) could see more playing time than Duce. Staley is simply an insurance policy in case of injury.I know I wasn't at training camp, but Staley looked terrible in preseason. I'm shocked they kept him over Humes (or another prospect). Any homers surprised Staley made the roster?I think you will end up seeing Duce inactive for most games with Cobbs on the active roster playing on special teams.
GB can chime in but Staley knows the offense. Although he would not be as effective as FWP, he would be able to step in and work with the first team as the main guy.With that said, I don't agree with Staley being there. Kuhn (see practice squad soon) would have been better. Given a few weeks, Cobbs will be better.Godsbrother, I'm so freaking confused at this. What exactly is Staley insuring? He's not good at anything. Can't be the main guy. Can't play special teams. Can't be the goal-line back. He's like William Green, except for the fact that at 1 point in time he did actually play well. His under/over for the number of games he's activated is 2. What am I missing?
Given their pre-seasons, yep.chris1969 said:Do you think Cobbs is better than Humes?
I thought Morgan stood a good chance of getting cut. Shocked by the Frazier cut.CrossEyed said:Wow, that surprises me. I thought both of these guys would make it.I just heard LB Andre Frazier and WR Quincy Morgan were cut.Last 2 cuts?
One other possibility is that they may still intend to trade him. To Miami. True, the Fins have alot of choices like Dayne (turf toe), Davenport, A Smith, etc. etc. But Staley was a 3x 1000 yd rusher... possible.chris1969 said:Well why not cut Staley and keep one of the guys tat beat him out in camp?
Staley is a known quantity. He may have lost a step but he has experience, something Kuhn, Cobbs and Humes lack. Apparently they believe that Kuhn, Humes and perhaps Cobbs just don't have a grasp on everything it takes. Also, there is a very good chance that Kuhn and/or Humes will end up on the practice squad so they may be able to have their cake and eat it too. If you cut Staley he would be gone forever.nightshift said:GB can chime in but Staley knows the offense. Although he would not be as effective as FWP, he would be able to step in and work with the first team as the main guy.With that said, I don't agree with Staley being there. Kuhn (see practice squad soon) would have been better. Given a few weeks, Cobbs will be better.chris1969 said:Godsbrother, I'm so freaking confused at this. What exactly is Staley insuring? He's not good at anything. Can't be the main guy. Can't play special teams. Can't be the goal-line back. He's like William Green, except for the fact that at 1 point in time he did actually play well. His under/over for the number of games he's activated is 2. What am I missing?
Staley is a known quantity. He may have lost a step but he has experience, something Kuhn, Cobbs and Humes lack. Apparently they believe that Kuhn, Humes and perhaps Cobbs just don't have a grasp on everything it takes. Also, there is a very good chance that Kuhn and/or Humes will end up on the practice squad so they may be able to have their cake and eat it too. If you cut Staley he would be gone forever.nightshift said:GB can chime in but Staley knows the offense. Although he would not be as effective as FWP, he would be able to step in and work with the first team as the main guy.With that said, I don't agree with Staley being there. Kuhn (see practice squad soon) would have been better. Given a few weeks, Cobbs will be better.chris1969 said:Godsbrother, I'm so freaking confused at this. What exactly is Staley insuring? He's not good at anything. Can't be the main guy. Can't play special teams. Can't be the goal-line back. He's like William Green, except for the fact that at 1 point in time he did actually play well. His under/over for the number of games he's activated is 2. What am I missing?