What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Duke Johnson RB Dolphins (1 Viewer)

Love him. Uber talent.
I wasn't overly impressed last year.

If you want to see an impressive rookie look at Henry's game last week or Washington's...haven't seen anything of the sort from Duke.

Duke is overrated IMHO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I liked him coming into the season but am cooling big time now. With Pryor, Coleman, Gordon, and Barnbridge I am not sure where he will fit in this passing game. Originally I thought he would spend a lot of time in the slot but their pass catchers seem adequate from the WR position. I think Crowell gets the bulk of carries so it may take an injury to become more FF relevant. He may still take on the bulk of third down work however I do not see him surpassing last years numbers without an injury to Crowell.

 
I liked him coming into the season but am cooling big time now. With Pryor, Coleman, Gordon, and Barnbridge I am not sure where he will fit in this passing game. Originally I thought he would spend a lot of time in the slot but their pass catchers seem adequate from the WR position. I think Crowell gets the bulk of carries so it may take an injury to become more FF relevant. He may still take on the bulk of third down work however I do not see him surpassing last years numbers without an injury to Crowell.
You might be missing game script. Browns Defense is bad, like really bad, and they will be playing catchup a lot, that doesn't add up to a lot of Crowell. It does add up to a lot of throwing and Crowell is not a part of that game script. Duke is dropping now and I'm eating that up, he will be plenty relevant without anybody getting injured.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You might be missing game script. Browns Defense is bad, like really bad, and they will be playing catchup a lot, that doesn't add up to a lot of Crowell. It does add up to a lot of throwing and Crowell is not a part of that game script. Duke is dropping now and I'm eating that up, he will be plenty relevant without anybody getting injured.
Also, having a QB who can run will help boost his #s.

 
You don't find Crowell too sexual for the NFL?  

Not sure if I got auto-corrected, if it is the fact I drank way too many beers last night or both but I meant to just say that Crow's ADP combined with being the potential grinder with a running QB is getting me excited, but Crow is probably just trash so maybe I need to avoid. 

 
Isaiah is the guy right now for inside runs, but his YPC overall last season was only JUST higher than Duke's, and with his age and ability to break big plays, I wouldn't be surprised to see Duke not just used slightly more in the run game, but a lot more. I also trust Hue more than Pettine to "create" plays for Duke. Giovanni Bernard in Hue's schemes have gotten around 160 carries in his first three seasons and that's with Hue having to go to a higher authority... but I think that 160 ATT is a VERY reasonable projection. So take 160 Carries, an ever so slight uptick in catches to 65, and you're looking at ~1150-1200 total yards with last years averages. I think that's being conservative. If he improves as a runner AT ALL, we could witness a legitimate breakout. I still think his size will limit carries, but with the Browns and Hue, I don't see too many projections for Duke touches being too high... just some may be more bold than others.   Buy now!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hope you're right.  The coaches have definitely been making a big deal out of Crowell this offseason, but I think both RBs can coexist.  A lot of the FBG experts are pretty high on him but he still seems to be flying under the radar.  In the drafts I've had, nobody was in a rush to grab him. 

 
I hope you're right.  The coaches have definitely been making a big deal out of Crowell this offseason, but I think both RBs can coexist.  A lot of the FBG experts are pretty high on him but he still seems to be flying under the radar.  In the drafts I've had, nobody was in a rush to grab him. 
Not JUST Duke, though. There were a slew of great PPR backs FBGs / DD had rated way higher than anywhere else. Gio, Woodhead, AA/Theo, Sproles. Meanwhile everyone else in your league is scarfing up the Stewarts and Ivorys.

 
What were Hue Jackson's gamescripts like for Hill / Gio splits when Andy Dalton was injured?

Wondering if we should have expectation changes with the young QB coming in for Cleveland as far tilting things more or less to the pass-catching in Duke back vs the heavier dose of Crowell we have seen weeks 1 & 2..

 
SproutDaddy said:
Is this guy worth holding onto in redraft?  Considering dropping him.
Depends on your roster makeup ... But I would consider holding. Browns loosing Coleman, and Kessler starting. I doubt Crow will have much running room against Miami. Could be lots of dump off passes to Duke this week.

Hes pretty much the best pass Catcher they have right now. I expect Hugh to get creative - using his RB's to take pressure off of the rookie QB.

i would hold this week and see how he gets worked in to the passing game.

 
Is this guy worth holding onto in redraft?  Considering dropping him.


Depends on your roster makeup ... But I would consider holding. Browns loosing Coleman, and Kessler starting. I doubt Crow will have much running room against Miami. Could be lots of dump off passes to Duke this week.

Hes pretty much the best pass Catcher they have right now. I expect Hugh to get creative - using his RB's to take pressure off of the rookie QB.

i would hold this week and see how he gets worked in to the passing game.
I watched some of Kessler's highlights and feel he is prefectly capable of short/intermediate throws but is hurting on the deep ball.

Duke hasn't had the proper numbers of opportunities yet this year, CLE is sort of up in the air but Duke is currently averaging 5.7/rush and 10.3/reception, I don't see any issue with him, just his usage so far.

Im puzzled on why so many people are thinking it's safe to dismiss/cut bait on him after only 2 weeks especially when it makes sense they would want to use him more to ease Kessler's transition, they will be playing from behind a lot obviously which to me lends itself more to Duke than Crow. Duke's a good player with elite receiving skills.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
bb7278 said:
Im puzzled on why so many people are thinking it's safe to dismiss/cut bait on him after only 2 weeks especially when it makes sense they would want to use him more to ease Kessler's transition, they will be playing from behind a lot obviously which to me lends itself more to Duke than Crow. Duke's a good player with elite receiving skills.
Lack of usage so far + offense situation just sucks right now.

Maybe it isn't 100% safe to drop him right now, but he's on the borderline for me. He seems locked in as a bye week filler type guy, and I'd rather have a lottery ticket, someone like Kenneth Dixon if available.

 
I think on most rosters that Duke will be a low end flex option or bye week fill in. On my roster that is wasted space for most of the season.  My take is that he's going to be consistently below what I need in points for a starter. I would rather work the waiver wire to find a player with the potential for a higher ceiling. Duke is high floor, low ceiling and in my experience that doesn't help win championships. A better bye week strategy for me is to play a strength of schedule matchup on weeks where I have bye issues or am depleted at RB due to injury. Just my take. I put Hill and Duke in the same category. 

 
I definitely would not drop him yet.  See how he is used after the change.  This qb may need to depend on dump offs so maybe they simplify things and use duke more.  Worth a hold in PPRs imo. 

 
 

Duke Johnson rushed 10 times for 69 yards and caught 5-of-7 targets for 12 yards in the Browns' Week 3 loss to Miami.
With Cody Kessler starting, the Browns went with a run-heavy gamescript. The 10 carries were a season high, and Johnson was more effective than Isaiah Crowell (15 carries, 79 yards). Johnson should remain involved in the offense at least until Josh McCown returns in 1-3 weeks. He's a low-end FLEX for Week 4.

 
 
 
Sep 25 - 5:24 PM

 
I would say that's accurate Faust, he is still a desperation play as one week he looks better than Crowell but another week Crowell looks better. It's obviously Rbbc in Cleveland on a bad running team, partly due to them always being behind. I could see them relying on Duke more as the season goes to see what he's truely made out of but for now getting 10 points out of him seems to be about right depending n scoring system.

 
What are folks thinking about his prospects this week?  Tough run D with McCown back, perhaps a chance for him to re-emerge?  Or has the Browns run game become the Crowell show?

 
What are folks thinking about his prospects this week?  Tough run D with McCown back, perhaps a chance for him to re-emerge?  Or has the Browns run game become the Crowell show?
I don't have a real choice....I'm starting him. But I like your thinking. I see Crowell having a hard time running the ball. I see this game being close and hopefully turning into a short passing game contest. Duke is due for a TD....hopefully this is the week he makes pay dirt. You gotta think they want to keep him involved, he's a real good player, just not getting the opportunities.

 
I don't have a real choice....I'm starting him. But I like your thinking. I see Crowell having a hard time running the ball. I see this game being close and hopefully turning into a short passing game contest. Duke is due for a TD....hopefully this is the week he makes pay dirt. You gotta think they want to keep him involved, he's a real good player, just not getting the opportunities.
Flipped a coin tween Henry and Duke

Come on Duke!

 
What are folks thinking about his prospects this week?  Tough run D with McCown back, perhaps a chance for him to re-emerge?  Or has the Browns run game become the Crowell show?
Typically one has to emerge before they can re-emerge.

 
Rolling with Duke today...granted not a lot of choices, but this is why I drafted him last year.

I'll be happy with a nice 8. (non-ppr)

 
Re-ranking the 2015 RB class: The Todd Gurley conundrum

Excerpt:

5) Duke Johnson, Cleveland Browns

Originally drafted: Round 3, No. 77 overall.

Put Johnson on the Patriots or Falcons, and he'd be a star. Put him on the Browns, and he's a role player who most fans haven't been plugged in on since before the 2015 NFL Draft. However, only two running backs (David Johnson and Theo Riddick) have more receiving yards since 2015. Duke Johnson has quickness that you can't teach. On one play against the Chargers, he caused an injury because two defenders ran into each other after tackling the space where Johnson used to be.

Johnson is ranked so high here because every team in the NFL would love to have him, and he's just getting started. He's been incredibly efficient on a poor offense, finishing No. 2 in yards-per-route among running backs with at least 50 targets, according to PFF. Johnson won't make a living running inside, but only bad teams focus on what their players can'tdo. Johnson fits perfectly in today's NFL as a "space player" who will probably be catching 50 passes a year for another decade. Teams can win with guys like Johnson.
 
According to Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Duke Johnson is the "leading candidate" to replace Andrew Hawkins as the Browns' primary slot receiver.

Johnson was surprisingly profiled in Cabot's preview of the team's wide receivers. The 23-year-old has emerged as one of the more polished receiving backs in football, topping 500 yards receiving in each of his two seasons. Cabot believes he has a "good chance" of taking over the Hawkins role and it stands to reason that his receiving output would increase under those conditions. Johnson hasn't been used much in the running game anyway, logging a mere 177 carries since arriving as a third-round pick in 2015.

Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer 

Jul 23 - 10:47 AM

 
Cabot believes he has a "good chance" of taking over the Hawkins role and it stands to reason that his receiving output would increase under those conditions.
I'm going to tap the brakes on that. Something about this just didn't smell right to me , so I checked...

Duke had 74 targets at the RB position last year on 457 total snaps played.

Hawkins had 52 targets at the slot last year on 647 total snaps played.

 
What do others think about Duke's situation this year? It seems like if he can get the targets he saw as a backup RB PLUS the targets Hawkins saw as slot WR, he could be in a for a very good year.  But not sure how many times a RB has been used in this way--sounds sort of unusual so hard to gauge.

https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/football/news/browns-duke-johnson-expected-to-serve-as-slot-receiver/
If the reports are true on Browns' plan to utilize Duke Johnson as their slot WR, this would make sense since he is one of few experienced receivers.   If anything, he would be an ideal candidate for zero RB strategy

 
If the reports are true on Browns' plan to utilize Duke Johnson as their slot WR, this would make sense since he is one of few experienced receivers.   If anything, he would be an ideal candidate for zero RB strategy
It doesn't make sense because without Duke at RB, they basically have nothing behind Crowell. They can rotate TEs and WRs through the slot position depending on the play. 

 
It doesn't make sense because without Duke at RB, they basically have nothing behind Crowell. They can rotate TEs and WRs through the slot position depending on the play. 
I have read analysis suggesting if anything were to happen to Crowell, George Atkinson III would get first crack at replacing him leaving Duke to his existing role.

 
I have read analysis suggesting if anything were to happen to Crowell, George Atkinson III would get first crack at replacing him leaving Duke to his existing role.
You think the Browns are deeper at RB than WR?  It just seems like a really weird move. RBs don't really do much from the slot. Is he really good enough to transition? 

 
You think the Browns are deeper at RB than WR?  It just seems like a really weird move. RBs don't really do much from the slot. Is he really good enough to transition? 
I have no idea about the quality of their depth at either position or about Duke's ability to switch positions, just throwing out something I read in Fantasy Football Index (a magazine and website that I respect).

 
You think the Browns are deeper at RB than WR?  It just seems like a really weird move. RBs don't really do much from the slot. Is he really good enough to transition? 
This could be a great move for zero RB strategy in PPR. I could easily see RB2 value if they use him this way. It's not like whomever ends up at QB is going to be throwing the ball deep down the field to the outside WR's a lot so the TE and Slot could see some additional work.

 
This could be a great move for zero RB strategy in PPR. I could easily see RB2 value if they use him this way. It's not like whomever ends up at QB is going to be throwing the ball deep down the field to the outside WR's a lot so the TE and Slot could see some additional work.
Sure, it just seems weird. It's hard to imagine Duke having never played WR is a better option than all the WRs they have or the insane freak TE they just drafted. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top