On the topic of WRs, get to know Vince Mayle from Washington State. He caught my attention in the Oregon game a few weeks back and has been putting up strong numbers this season. He has #1 NFL WR dimensions and shows pretty good movement skills. Check out this ankle-breaker from last week:
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=11603837
He already burned Cal for a long TD tonight and it's not even halftime.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=11644153
Mayle is a 6th-year Senior, so he's at least 24 or could be 25. Pass.
Whether or not Mayle is a strong prospect, talent is a more important variable than age (within reason). An over-aged player with high talent is preferable to a young player with a much lower ceiling. This is common sense in FF. It's why great veterans like Brandon Marshall and Frank Gore get rostered in every league while mediocre day three/UDFA rookies populate the waiver wire. The only players who matter are the players who are good enough to become top scorers at their position. Therefore the most important thing to ask yourself about any player is whether or not he has the talent to become a top scorer. A player's age is basically independent of his peak talent level and isn't therefore a good reason to dismiss somebody on its own.
I can understand age being used as a tiebreaker for two players who have similar current ability or as a tool to predict improvement for younger players, but it's not a good reason to dismiss a player outright. This becomes more obvious when you think about veteran players. If I say, "Steve Smith is a good receiver" and you reply with "he's old" then you haven't done anything to address the actual issue of his talent. Likewise, if I say "Vince Mayle might be a good prospect" and you reply with "he's old" then you haven't done anything to address the actual issue of his talent. There's an implication that his age
causes his "talent" in the sense that he only looks good because he's 3-4 years older than many of the players in college football. I get that, but ultimately it's not a refutation of his peak ability level itself. If you could somehow drop 24 year old Larry Fitzgerald into college football, pointing out that he's 24 wouldn't suddenly invalidate his future completely. He'd still possess the requisite talent to go into the NFL and thrive for several seasons, which is all that matters.
Whether or not Mayle has any kind of a future, there have been plenty of guys who came into the NFL over-aged and still made an impact. Kelvin Benjamin is doing it right now as a 23 year old rookie who turns 24 in February. I don't think his owners are too concerned by the fact that he was an over-aged draft prospect at this point. Like any one variable, if you put too much stock in it then you're inevitably going to miss the bigger picture at times.