What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Leagues - If McFadden to the Raiders (1 Viewer)

Spike

Footballguy
Thinking that moves the Raiders have been making could result in the Raiders picking McFadden, I wonder what the FBG world thinks it will do to McFadden's dynasty/keeper league value.

Frankly, it worries me. I don't feel Oakland has the OL to support him.

 
I'd say it depends on where the other backs go. You pretty much know if Denver drafts a RB in the first 2 rounds, that back will get serious consideration for the 1.1 rookie pick. But yes to your original question, I don't think they call that place the "black hole" for nothing. :shrug:

 
If Fargas can get 1000 yards dtarting half the year, then McFadden should be good for 1400. He might get a TD or 2 less, but the yards should be there.

 
I believe this thread will have an extremely long shelf life

because McFadden will be a Raider..... guaranteed.

 
If Fargas can get 1000 yards dtarting half the year, then McFadden should be good for 1400. He might get a TD or 2 less, but the yards should be there.
I like your thinking. :thumbup: While I'm inclined to avoid all Raiders, Russell, Walker, and McFadden would be a potentially dangerous trio. Improve that OL and you have a good team for FF.
 
If Fargas can get 1000 yards dtarting half the year, then McFadden should be good for 1400. He might get a TD or 2 less, but the yards should be there.
I like your thinking. :thumbup: While I'm inclined to avoid all Raiders, Russell, Walker, and McFadden would be a potentially dangerous trio. Improve that OL and you have a good team for FF.
Walker is toastRussell very eratic in '09A very long year ahead
 
If Fargas can get 1000 yards dtarting half the year, then McFadden should be good for 1400. He might get a TD or 2 less, but the yards should be there.
Not only did Fargas do well, but if I remember correctly Lamont Jordan looked like a beast early in the season until he got hurt and his production started dropping... Personally, I'd be cautiously optimistic if McFadden ends up in Oakland.
 
If Fargas can get 1000 yards dtarting half the year, then McFadden should be good for 1400. He might get a TD or 2 less, but the yards should be there.
Not only did Fargas do well, but if I remember correctly Lamont Jordan looked like a beast early in the season until he got hurt and his production started dropping... Personally, I'd be cautiously optimistic if McFadden ends up in Oakland.
:rolleyes: Oakland's running game put up good numbers last year.
 
If Fargas can get 1000 yards dtarting half the year, then McFadden should be good for 1400. He might get a TD or 2 less, but the yards should be there.
I like your thinking. :clap: While I'm inclined to avoid all Raiders, Russell, Walker, and McFadden would be a potentially dangerous trio. Improve that OL and you have a good team for FF.
Walker is toastRussell very eratic in '09A very long year ahead
maybeprobablysure, but it could be interesting
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top