Somewhat surprised to see a lack of support for Bulger given the strong second half and pick up of McMichael and Bennet.
Bulger has an enviable cadre of talent about him and a better O-line this year, particularly if Incognito gets moved to guard. With Holt and Bruce providing a solid 1-2 and the presence of Bennet to offer a taller target, in addition to the presence of McMichael who was a top TE not more than two years ago, Bulger has better receivers than all but the Colts.
Consider also the outlet of Jackson out of the backfield and the possibility of a two TE set with McMichael and Klopfenstein (probably misspelled that and the word misspelled), Bulger could conceivably have the best year of his career.
The Rams are now playing on the new turf, so the games should be fast and explosive.
Palmer may have better tools, but he lost two receivers in Washington and Henry, and does not have a dependably healthy receiving RB, as Johnson has low involvement in the passing game and Perry is often injured (pretty sure that is the back up RB's name).
Brees will do exceptionally well this year, probable number 2, Bulger maybe 3 and Palmer 4 if they can bring it back together. Bengals have a lot of disruption and if they can not control off-field behavior, it may affect the team given the NFL's new stance/policies.
I didn't comment on Brady, mostly forgot about him. He could easily be 2 or 3 as well. I think there will be less disparity among the top five qb this year.