Dynasty QB Rankings- QB21 (1 Viewer)

[jeter23]

1. Peyton Manning, Colts (3-24-1976) 59% [brady 37%]

2. Tom Brady, Patriots (8-3-1977) 37% [Romo 3%] **QB1 and 2 used the same poll**

3. Carson Palmer, Bengals (12-27-1979) 44% [Romo 21%]

4. Drew Brees, Saints (1-15-1979) 43% [Romo 34%]

5. Tony Romo, Cowboys (4-21-1980) 50% [Roethlisberger 47%]

6. Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers (3-2-1982) 47% **Same poll used for QB5 and 6**

7. Jay Cutler, Broncos (4-29-1983) 29% [E Manning 18%]

8. Eli Manning, Giants (1-3-1981) 26% [McNabb 20%]

9. Donovan McNabb, Eagles (11-25-1976) 28% [Hasselbeck 26%]

10. Matt Hasselbeck, Seahawks (9-25-1975) 41% [bulger 25%]

11. Marc Bulger, Rams (4-5-1977) 28% [Young 20%]

12. Vince Young, Titans (5-18-1983) 26% [schaub 22%]

13. Phillip Rivers, Chargers (12-8-1981) 27% [schaub 23%]

14. Matt Schaub, Texans (6-25-1981) 43% [Anderson 21%]

15. Derek Anderson, Browns (6-15-1983) 33% [Garrard 31%]

16. David Garrard, Jaguars (2-14-1978) 31% **QB15 and 16 used the same poll**

17. Matt Leinart, Cardinals (5-11-1983) 43% [Campbell 24%]

18. Aaron Rodgers, Packers (12-2-1983) 41% [Russell 31%]

19. Jason Campbell, Redskins (12-31-1981) 40% [Russell 27%]

20. JaMarcus Russell, Raiders (8-9-1985) 37% [Edwards 16%]

 

[big country]

I like Ryan here-

 

[Ron_Mexico]

I like Ryan here-

what he said.

 

[Holland Freeze]

I keep going back and forth on Quinn and Edwards.

I still feel Quinn has the higher upside but may not get to start any time soon. Edwards I think is more the consistent producer but not the high end. At this point, thinking you already have your starter this may be the better move for a solid longterm back up you can use now put him in front.

Ryan is on the screen but not knowing where he will land puts him solidly behind the other 2 at least in my opinion

 

[Jeff Tefertiller]

Ryan here, but could take Delhomme if I needed a starter for a couple of years.

 

[JPeso]

Went with Delhomme here. When healthy, he is as solid as they come as a QB2, and a decent QB1. Add Hackett and subtract Foster from the list of weapons, and hopefully add a serviceable change of pace back to the mix and Delhomme could be money for 3 more years on the cheap.

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

Ryan here, but could take Delhomme if I needed a starter for a couple of years.

The same could be said about Garcia and Kitna.

 

[JPeso]

Ryan here, but could take Delhomme if I needed a starter for a couple of years.

The same could be said about Garcia and Kitna.

Accept for being 5 and 3 years older than Delhomme. Kitna's FF numbers are good, but he cannot win games consistently. I wouldn't doubt if he wasn't the starter by the end of 2008 season. Garcia is solid, but one more year, maybe two?

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

Ryan here, but could take Delhomme if I needed a starter for a couple of years.

The same could be said about Garcia and Kitna.

Accept for being 5 and 3 years older than Delhomme. Kitna's FF numbers are good, but he cannot win games consistently. I wouldn't doubt if he wasn't the starter by the end of 2008 season. Garcia is solid, but one more year, maybe two?

If Detroit ever fixed their pass blocking woes, I think Kitna would last much longer.Garcia is winding down, but at QB20+ he deserves to be in the conversation.

 

[cstu]

Ryan here, but could take Delhomme if I needed a starter for a couple of years.

The same could be said about Garcia and Kitna.

Accept for being 5 and 3 years older than Delhomme. Kitna's FF numbers are good, but he cannot win games consistently. I wouldn't doubt if he wasn't the starter by the end of 2008 season. Garcia is solid, but one more year, maybe two?

If Detroit ever fixed their pass blocking woes, I think Kitna would last much longer.Garcia is winding down, but at QB20+ he deserves to be in the conversation.

At this point it's tough to rank guys since it will likely depend on what teams need. Not many owners are going to want Delhomme/Kitna/Garcia as their #1 dynasty QB, this is the point where someone who waited on QB and drafted say, Russell, would take a reliable QB. The owners that took an older QB early would be looking for a young QB here. I still think Ryan is the choice over Delhomme, but I can see a vet QB going here.

 

[jeter23]

bump for a few more votes.

 

[teamroc]

Ryan here, but could take Delhomme if I needed a starter for a couple of years.

The same could be said about Garcia and Kitna.

Accept for being 5 and 3 years older than Delhomme. Kitna's FF numbers are good, but he cannot win games consistently. I wouldn't doubt if he wasn't the starter by the end of 2008 season. Garcia is solid, but one more year, maybe two?

If Detroit ever fixed their pass blocking woes, I think Kitna would last much longer.Garcia is winding down, but at QB20+ he deserves to be in the conversation.

ehhh, nah.Why exactly would you want Garcia, at 38, to be your backup QB? There's ZERO upside. Or your QB3???Take Delhomme who could be a borderline QB1. Quinn/Ryan who have fairly bright futures, and 100x the upside of Garia over the next 5-6 years. Garcia isn't even a good *backup*. If you're talking about a BAD backup QB in a dynasty league, go with the guy who is under 25, with a big contract who will get a shot to start. Kitna, guy is 36. Again, very iffy backup QB. Very limited upside. Might not have a job by week 8.You really want to avoid QBs over 35, in the bottom half of starting QBs, bye week only starters when you can get high upside guys.Palmer / GarciaPalmer / DelhommePalmer / QuinnPalmer / KitnaPalmer / RyanI don't really see how you take Garcia/Kitna over any of those guys. Ryan is a late 1st round pick in dynasty leagues. You really think you can trade Garcia/Kitna for Ryan? Or even close to Ryan? It's two very different ball parks. Delhomme is MUCH younger, better situations, more weapons, and actually has a shot to play the next 4 years. Kitna/Garcia have zero chance, and probably little to no chance of playing in 2009.You don't ever want your QB3 to be over 36-38 years old, zero upside when you can have huge upside guys, or at least guys far younger.

 

[Birdie048]

Voted Clemems. Good decision making skills, solid arm strength and decent WR weapons

Don't like Delhomme. Take away Steve Smith and he's nothing. Steve Smith makes Delhomme Top 15 (but Delhomme does not make S Smith better).

Quinn has not shown me enough, but I can see his potential being here.

 

[BuckeyeArt]

Don't like Delhomme. Take away Steve Smith and he's nothing. Steve Smith makes Delhomme Top 15 (but Delhomme does not make S Smith better).

You may want to take another look or talk to a few Smith owners. Last year, Smith was far better in the 2 full games Delhomme played versus the rest of the season. Also, 2004 was Delhomme's best season as a pro - and it didn't include Steve Smith.