What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty rookie #1 (1 Viewer)

Who would you take with the #1 rookie pick?

  • Matt Stafford

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mark Sanchez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Donald Brown

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LeSean McCoy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Knowshon Moreno

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris "Beanie" Wells

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Michael Crabtree

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jeremy Maclin

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Derrius Heyward Bey

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Percy Harvin

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hakeem Nicks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kenny Britt

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Multiple Scores

Footballguy
If you owned the #1 rookie pick in a Dynasty (NON-PPR) draft who would you take?

I can turn this poll into a series if there's enough interest and always feel free to ask for new additions to the poll choices

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you owned the #1 rookie pick in a Dynasty (NON-PPR) draft who would you take?I can turn this poll into a series if there's enough interest and always feel free to ask for new additions to the poll choices
Great idea. I think we should definitely do this same thing again on 4/27.I took Crabtree. To me he is the most sure thing available.
 
I have the 1.01 in one of my non-PPR leagues. I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.

 
At this point without knowing who's blocking for them or throwing them the rock, I'll take Wells, but if I had this pick I could take any of my top 4 depending on situation.

 
You know, I might actually just give Moreno the edge over Crabtree there. It's a tough one though, since we don't yet know who these guys will be playing for.

 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
:loco: Sure, there are question marks around several of the guys this year, but every prospect has a list of question marks around them. Heck, even Peterson did.

Wells has a rare combination of speed, size, and burst not seen many times before and Moreno has elite instincts and vision. I think they both make for very good FF prospects.

 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
:rolleyes: Sure, there are question marks around several of the guys this year, but every prospect has a list of question marks around them. Heck, even Peterson did.

Wells has a rare combination of speed, size, and burst not seen many times before and Moreno has elite instincts and vision. I think they both make for very good FF prospects.
So do i. Both guys would have been in the top 5 of last year's "elite" RB class.
 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
I have no doubt that 2-3 of the backs from this year's group will be successful when it's all said and done, but there isn't a bankable "can't-miss" player like Peterson or even Lynch. The two guys who probably have the best chance of being first round picks, Moreno and Wells, have lots of question marks. It just isn't a very top-heavy group. I think the talent this year is at WR. There are at least five guys there who look worthy of first round picks.

 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
I have no doubt that 2-3 of the backs from this year's group will be successful when it's all said and done, but there isn't a bankable "can't-miss" player like Peterson or even Lynch. The two guys who probably have the best chance of being first round picks, Moreno and Wells, have lots of question marks. It just isn't a very top-heavy group. I think the talent this year is at WR. There are at least five guys there who look worthy of first round picks.
Thing is, Lynch was not a bankable can't miss and many people were questioning Peterson's toughness saying he won't last 16 games or have a long career. Similar to Wells except with Wells, I agree with the concern. Still, took Wells 1.01. Probably will in PPR too but Moreno will probably get move receptions (offenses being equal)

 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
I have no doubt that 2-3 of the backs from this year's group will be successful when it's all said and done, but there isn't a bankable "can't-miss" player like Peterson or even Lynch. The two guys who probably have the best chance of being first round picks, Moreno and Wells, have lots of question marks. It just isn't a very top-heavy group. I think the talent this year is at WR. There are at least five guys there who look worthy of first round picks.
Thing is, Lynch was not a bankable can't miss and many people were questioning Peterson's toughness saying he won't last 16 games or have a long career. Similar to Wells except with Wells, I agree with the concern. Still, took Wells 1.01. Probably will in PPR too but Moreno will probably get move receptions (offenses being equal)
I disagree on Lynch. It was pretty obvious that he was going to be a solid mid level starter. In some respects, Wells is a poor man's Peterson and Moreno is a poor man's Lynch.

I'm not saying those guys can't be successful, but I won't be targeting either in my drafts.

 
I would love to take a RB there, but this group of backs is so putrid that I might just take Crabtree.
Have people been that spoiled these past few years that if there isn't a clear #1 favorite, or 4-5 NFL first round quality RBs, that the entire RB draft class is now considered rotten? This class isn't that bad.
I have no doubt that 2-3 of the backs from this year's group will be successful when it's all said and done, but there isn't a bankable "can't-miss" player like Peterson or even Lynch. The two guys who probably have the best chance of being first round picks, Moreno and Wells, have lots of question marks. It just isn't a very top-heavy group. I think the talent this year is at WR. There are at least five guys there who look worthy of first round picks.
Thing is, Lynch was not a bankable can't miss and many people were questioning Peterson's toughness saying he won't last 16 games or have a long career. Similar to Wells except with Wells, I agree with the concern. Still, took Wells 1.01. Probably will in PPR too but Moreno will probably get move receptions (offenses being equal)
I disagree on Lynch. It was pretty obvious that he was going to be a solid mid level starter. In some respects, Wells is a poor man's Peterson and Moreno is a poor man's Lynch.

I'm not saying those guys can't be successful, but I won't be targeting either in my drafts.
I disagree with your disagreeing, Lynch had many question marks and was not that highly thought of, I'd venture to say in the mainstream media (ESPN, NFLN) that Chris Wells is higher rated, when Lynch came out there was so much talk about him being from Cal it was to the point of annoying.
 
I disagree with your disagreeing, Lynch had many question marks and was not that highly thought of, I'd venture to say in the mainstream media (ESPN, NFLN) that Chris Wells is higher rated, when Lynch came out there was so much talk about him being from Cal it was to the point of annoying.
There may have been people who had doubts about Lynch, but I wasn't one of them. I think most people who watch Pac-10 football felt he was a pretty impressive overall prospect. Stud? No, but definitely NFL starter material. There weren't any real holes in his game aside from a lack of elite speed and burst (he was good in those categories, just not quite elite). Wells has more of a boom-or-bust component. I doubt he'll be picked as high as Lynch was and I'm not as high on him. I think he has a chance to produce out of the gate and possibly even win RoY, but he's not a guy I want on my FF team whereas I would've felt very comfortable investing an early pick in Lynch.
 
I went with Knowshon, given the boom or bust potential of Wells. I'm not as concerned about the downside of injury with Wells as others are. He has proven he will play injured and full-time training and trainers will help with the little things. I just think Knowshon will get more overall opportunities to produce yards and score. I can't take Crabtree as the #1 in a non-PPR. If this were PPR I might just take him #1.

 
I went with Knowshon, given the boom or bust potential of Wells. I'm not as concerned about the downside of injury with Wells as others are. He has proven he will play injured and full-time training and trainers will help with the little things. I just think Knowshon will get more overall opportunities to produce yards and score. I can't take Crabtree as the #1 in a non-PPR. If this were PPR I might just take him #1.
What about 0.5 PPR for WR and TE only?
 
I'd take Wells.

Good measurables.... Good BMI.... Good pedigree.... when he ran the sub 4.5 40yd dash his RB "number" went up too!

I'd have thought the experts here would label him a can't miss since they don't go by opinion, only stats.

 
I went with Knowshon, given the boom or bust potential of Wells. I'm not as concerned about the downside of injury with Wells as others are. He has proven he will play injured and full-time training and trainers will help with the little things. I just think Knowshon will get more overall opportunities to produce yards and score. I can't take Crabtree as the #1 in a non-PPR. If this were PPR I might just take him #1.
What about 0.5 PPR for WR and TE only?
Coin flip??
 
I went with Knowshon, given the boom or bust potential of Wells. I'm not as concerned about the downside of injury with Wells as others are. He has proven he will play injured and full-time training and trainers will help with the little things. I just think Knowshon will get more overall opportunities to produce yards and score. I can't take Crabtree as the #1 in a non-PPR. If this were PPR I might just take him #1.
What about 0.5 PPR for WR and TE only?
Coin flip??
Gotta be Coin?? LOL
 
I went with Knowshon, given the boom or bust potential of Wells. I'm not as concerned about the downside of injury with Wells as others are. He has proven he will play injured and full-time training and trainers will help with the little things. I just think Knowshon will get more overall opportunities to produce yards and score. I can't take Crabtree as the #1 in a non-PPR. If this were PPR I might just take him #1.
What about 0.5 PPR for WR and TE only?
Coin flip??
Gotta be Coin?? LOL
11 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)9 Members: Multiple Scores, Crazy8s, bicycle_seat_sniffer, garlicduck, Coin Flip, •TheRealMcCoy, Crippler, theredoz, William Munny

:rant:

 
I went with Moreno, as he seems the "safest" option of the 3 (with Wells and Crabtree). It's close enough between the 3 though that I would wait to see where they land before making a final choice.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top