This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Did you vote 5 times for Nicks? Please don't vote more than once if that's what you're doing.
I don't know that the hell you're talking about.
That's funny. I thought the same thing. No votes for nicks in 56 hours and suddenly 5 in 20 minutes.
Actually it was the first 6 minutes of the poll. It's not going to matter in this poll i'm sure, but if say it's Nicks vs. Britt vs. Heyward Bey for a spot and Nicks finishes with 25, Britt 23, DHB 23 then Nicks will win but what if one guy voted 5 times for the same guy, it would screw up the integrity of the poll. The fact that a poster went out there way to say specifically Nicks is better than Crabtree and Crabtree had one vote at the time (Mine) and Nicks had 5 raises my eyebrows, it will be interesting to see when 150 votes are cast if Nicks still has 5 votes.
Now Nicks has 6....
He figures if Nicks got 5 votes there is hanky panky goin' on.
It's not the 5 votes but more the 71% at that point in time.He figures if Nicks got 5 votes there is hanky panky goin' on.
good god, whatever.It's not the 5 votes but more the 71% at that point in time.He figures if Nicks got 5 votes there is hanky panky goin' on.
Dude,It's simple math...Are you putting up a poll to get different people's opinions, or are you looking for someone to agree with you?It's not the 5 votes but more the 71% at that point in time.He figures if Nicks got 5 votes there is hanky panky goin' on.
Interesting that you think so. Care to elaborate on why?Side note - there seem to be multiple quality RB who could be drafted into good situations to make a instant impact. Would not surprise me to see 3 or possibly 4 of them taken before the WR debate will matter.
Good lord. Something smells fishy when Nicks got no votes in 56 hours and got 5 in 6 minutes to take a 5-1-1 lead on everyone else. Now that is simple math for you. If you're looking for an argument, look elsewhere, this is getting way off topic.
You've been a member here for 9 days.Let the poll play out.
Started out Nicks getting 5 of the first 7 votes (71%) and since that burst in the first 6 minutes he has received 2 of the last 41 votes (<5%). Do you still believe in your own simple math? Or do we ignore all those numbers and go by the number 9, as in 9 days i've been a member so therefore I must not be capable of rational thoughts.
I don't have a horse in this race.Believing that this poll is so important that someone would use 'multiple' aliases to mess up your vote isn't a strong position.Assuming the vote is 'fixed' just because a vote isn't going the way you hoped (for a short time period) is a rookie mistake.All I'm saying.
Good idea. So far this one looks like a runaway, pick #4 should be much more interesting, probably a Brown vs. McCoy showdown. I'm thinking of closing this one soon and jumping on to #4, thoughts?
Allowing a pole to get a decent sample size (over 100 votes) would give more accurate results.My 2 copper nickles.
I'm interested as well. I don't get much chance to watch college games and therefore have to rely on others for their analyses of rookies. Based on everything I've read about Crabtree (and all the question marks about the top RBs) I have Crabtree as my #1 overall rookie. I would love to hear an alternate opinion.
as would I, esp since Hicks gained some weight from hitting Taco Bell at 2am
Closing a poll after just a few hours of voting is 
