What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty TE #15 ranking (1 Viewer)

Who is TE #14?

  • Owen Daniels 11/9/1982

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jerramy Stevens 11/13/1979

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Marcedes Lewis 5/19/1984

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Leonard Pope 9/10/1983

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Joe Klopfenstein 11/9/1983

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dallas Clark 6/12/1979

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Alex Smith 5/22/1982

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Biabreakable

Footballguy
These are consensus dynasty rankings for year 2007 standard FBGs scoring no PPR

If you vote other, please specify.

Also, please comment on your vote, and list any player that should be nominated for the next round.

1. Antonio Gates 6/18/1980

2. Kellen Winslow 7/21/1983

3. Todd Heap 3/16/1980

4. Jeremy Shockey 8/18/1980

5. Alge Crumpler 12/23/1977

6. Ben Watson 12/18/1980

7. Tony Gonzalez 2/27/1976

8. Vernon Davis

9. Jason Witten 5/6/1982

10. Chris Cooley 7/11/1982

11. LJ Smith 5/13/1980

12. Heath Miller 10/22/1982

13. Randy McMichael 6/28/1979

14. Tony Scheffler 2/15/1983

15. Marcedes Lewis 5/19/1984

 
Last edited by a moderator:
lod2005 said:
LOL at the Marcedes Lewis votes. Who's gonna throw the ball to him? Dude doesn't even make the top 25.
I guess lod doesen't like Leftwich or Garrard and maybe he thinks it will be difficult for Lewis to beat out Wrightster.
 
Owen Daniels is the trendy pick here i'm sure, but realistically this guy hasnt' done much to justify it. I like Marcades Lewis here as well.

- Superior receiving threat.

- Little to no competition for reps at TE.

- Garrard is a check-down type of QB.

- Inconsistent Jag WR's.

- Now healthy, had 8 targets in week 15.

Lewis has the potential to be the no.1 target on his team, whereas Daniels if he can hold on to the job going into next year (no guarantee) is no better than the 2nd or 3rd option for the Texans. The Jags have a far higher potential to put up scores than the Jags, and are set to continue with the same core of players into the near future. Whereas with the Texans, there's too many questions around the QB and RB position to seriously give value to the other skill positions. I mean, Sage Rosenfels could be their starter next year?!!

 
Is their a reason that a guy with 42-590-6 is being ridiculously overlooked at this point? I guess NBA GM's fall into the same trap at times.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is their a reason that a guy with 42-590-6 is being ridiculously overlooked at this point? I guess NBA GM's fall into the same trap at times.
I agree Desmond Clark should be a part of this if not voted for allready.No one has yet mentioned him. He will be part of the next poll.Clark is tied with Winslow right now in my league and has outscored over half the guys that have been voted for allready.It is worth noting that he did not do anything for many years prior to this though.
 
I realise Desmond Clark is not an option in this poll. Perhaps an oversight on my part that I would like to correct if I could but I was just going with the players who had previous votes and who had been recomended.Desmond Clark in 2007 will be 30 years old:

+-------------------------+ | Receiving |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| 1999 den | 9 | 1 5 5.0 0 || 2000 den | 16 | 27 339 12.6 3 || 2001 den | 16 | 51 566 11.1 6 || 2002 mia | 10 | 2 42 21.0 0 || 2003 chi | 15 | 44 433 9.8 2 || 2004 chi | 15 | 24 282 11.8 1 || 2005 chi | 16 | 24 229 9.5 2 || 2006 chi | 14 | 42 590 14.0 6 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 111 | 215 2486 11.6 20 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+
This year with the Bears having improved Qbing he has returned to the level he was performing at in his last season with Denver.I would like to see a few more votes on this one before moving forward.
 
Biabreakable said:
I realise Desmond Clark is not an option in this poll. Perhaps an oversight on my part that I would like to correct if I could but I was just going with the players who had previous votes and who had been recomended.Desmond Clark in 2007 will be 30 years old:

+-------------------------+ | Receiving |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| 1999 den | 9 | 1 5 5.0 0 || 2000 den | 16 | 27 339 12.6 3 || 2001 den | 16 | 51 566 11.1 6 || 2002 mia | 10 | 2 42 21.0 0 || 2003 chi | 15 | 44 433 9.8 2 || 2004 chi | 15 | 24 282 11.8 1 || 2005 chi | 16 | 24 229 9.5 2 || 2006 chi | 14 | 42 590 14.0 6 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 111 | 215 2486 11.6 20 |+----------+-----+-------------------------+
This year with the Bears having improved Qbing he has returned to the level he was performing at in his last season with Denver.I would like to see a few more votes on this one before moving forward.
My first thought in viewing this (I don't believe I had checked out a TE dynasty poll before, or I would have had the same reaction earlier) was "where's Desmond Clark?"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top