Chester Taylor...he's been good this year only because he gets a ton of touches and has a ridiculously easy schedule, and even then he doesn't get into the end zone much. I think next year he'll take a hit just from schedule alone, and could possibly fall further if they sign WR help or something.
Hi Josh,I am not sure where your getting the idea that Chester Taylor has had a easy scedule against defenses that are poor against the run, fantasy outsiders?
The NFC North is playing the AFC East and NFC East this year and the Vikings having a winning record last year did not get the more favorable matchups.
Chester Taylors scedule 2006:
Sep 11 @Washington Won 19-16
Sep 17 Carolina Won 16-13
Sep 24 Chicago Lost 16-19
Oct 1 @Buffalo Lost 12-17
Oct 8 Detroit Won 26-17
Week 6 BYE
Oct 22 @Seattle Won 31-13
Oct 30 New England Lost 7-31
Nov 5 @San Francisco Lost 3-9
Nov 12 Green Bay Lost 17-23
Nov 19 @Miami 1:00pm 155 153
Nov 26 Arizona 1:00pm 158 147
Dec 3 @Chicago 1:00pm 146 123
Dec 10 @Detroit 1:00pm 118 118
Dec 17 N.Y. Jets 1:00pm 146 123
Dec 21 @Green Bay 8:00pm 125 123
Dec 31 St. Louis 1:00pm
I highlighted the teams who are in the bottom 10 in run defense in 2006. The only team on Taylors schedule that he has played against yet so far is Detroit. Detroit is a much better run defense when they have Shaun Rogers in the lineup, which they did still when Taylor played them. Rogers was later suspended and that has hurt thier run defense.
New England has the 3rd best defense against the run right now. Green Bay is 7th. Chicago is 11th against the run but they are ranked as the best defense overall in the league.
So I am not seeing how you can make the statement that Taylor has had a ridiculously easy schedule?
Here are the top 16 run defenses right now:
Minnesota
Baltimore
New England
Dallas
Denver
San Diego
Green Bay 2 games
New York (N)
Atlanta
Pittsburgh
Chicago 2 games
Miami
Seattle
Jacksonville
Kansas City
Carolina
So 50% or 8 of the 16 games Taylor plays this year will be against the top half of the leagues run defenses.
I am sure there are a few teams with more difficult run schedules. But I do not see how in any way shape or form that his schedule is easy.
Strongly disagree with Kevin Jones in top 5 - I see him as a first-round bust candidate next year. Again, NFC North teams this year all have among the easiest schedules ever, and according to Football Outsiders' advanced stats (which adjust for schedule) he is one of the worst starting RBs in the league (just like last year). Note that Chester Taylor doesn't rate very far above him, either, which is part of why I am suspicious of both for the future.
Again I am not sure where your arriving at this conclushion. Detroit is the only poor run defense in the NFC North. Jones has the play against the number 1 Vikings, number 7 Packers and 11th (but1st overall) Bears 6 games.Jones also plays against:
Seattle
Atlanta
Miami
New England
Dallas
So that is 11 games out of 16 that Jones plays against above average defenses against the run.
Ahman Green isn't top 10 either. Same NFC North schedule issues, plus he's a proven injury risk and you don't know if they'll move toward a committee.
Jayman,
Thanks for bringing the facts about successful rookie Rbs entering the top 20 and sometimes the top 10 right away.
However I do think we have been seeing this trend of rookie Rb making a huge impact right away decrease over the past 4 years.
Prior to 1993 we had rookie Rbs Emmitt Smith Barry Sanders Thurman Thomas and Rodney Hampton who made immediate impact and are amoung some of the best Rbs ever.
1993 1 in the top 10 Jerome Bettis 2nd overall
1994 1 in the top 10 Marshall Faulk 4th overall (Erict Rhett was 14th)
1995 1 in the top 10 Curtis Martin 2nd overall (Terrell Davis was 12th)
1996 1 in the top 10
1997 1 in the top 10
1998 2 top 10 Rbs that were rookies.
1999 Edge as a rookie was the number 1 Rb
2000 1 in the top 10
2001 1 in the top 10
2002 1 in the top 10
There hasn't been a top 10 rookie Rb since Portis.
What has happened to this consistent trend of rookie Rb plug and play success?
Has the game gotten too complex for a team to be able to extensivly use a rookie Rb now?
This trend coincides with teams generaly not placing as high a value on Rbs as they have in years past even though we did see 3 drafted in the 1st 5 picks in 2005, for the most part teams have been more willing to use RBBC approach with role players and cheaper free agents.
Kevin Jones and Carnell Williams are the only 2 recent rookie Rbs who have gotten the majority of the work right away and both have had thier struggles.
All things that need to be considered when creating new projections for 2007 as the old trend of rookie Rbs being a huge factor appears to be a thing of the past now. And there has been plenty of rookie Rb talent entering the league the past 4 years. But many of these rookie Rbs are having to wait longer before they get thier chance to be feature Rbs. Larry Johnson Steven Jackson Chris Perry Tatum Bell Michael Turner Ronnie Brown Cedric Benson Reggie Bush Lawrence Maroney DeAngelo Williams Lendale White Jerious Norwood Joeseph Addai MJD Mike Bell have all had to wait thier turn and most are still waiting.
I could see several of these rbs entering the top 20 if they get thier chance to be a featured Rb in 2007.