In this situation you gotta take all the situations he's been in and been able to situate his teams to win.gotta be joking here. Eli in the HoF? For what? Playing a long time?
Yup...imagine if he ever had a offensive line that could protect him.He’s in the top 10 in passing yards and passing TDs, and has two Super Bowl MVP’s. He’s getting in.
That's what people around here use to qualify HoF induction.gotta be joking here. Eli in the HoF? For what? Playing a long time?
Don't joke. You'll be seeing tons of these guys entering the HoF in the coming years the way medicine is today. Guys like Tom Brady are just the beginning. Just gonna have to get used to it.gotta be joking here. Eli in the HoF? For what? Playing a long time?
He deserves to be in. Ben also.No he doesn’t deserve it but they’ll give it to him.
once again... you're better than that. and there's a thread devoted to this "debate"gotta be joking here. Eli in the HoF? For what? Playing a long time?
We're letting his last year or two behind an awful line for terrible teams cloud judgement here.
He's a Manning. His stats are top 10 and still will be when he retires. He has two rings. His consecutive starts streak was 2nd only to Farve for QBs.Thoroughly mediocre Q.B. whose stats are a product of his time. He came along in the passing era. His stats will be massively eclipsed in no time at all. Now he did win two Super Bowls and Q.B.'s get quite a bit of that credit, deserving or not. I think he gets in, but didn't the Hall make Stabler wait a long time? Certainly not a first ballot guy and if the wait is too long his stats are not going to look as impressive.
If I am wrong here it will continue a long tradition of me being wrong. Certainly the smart money bets against me so you are likely correct.He's a Manning. His stats are top 10 and still will be when he retires. He has two rings. His consecutive starts streak was 2nd only to Farve for QBs.
There will be writers that try to make him wait but enough will look at the stats and just say yes, he's in. If Joe Namath is in for being a cocky SOB before a super bowl, then Eli will get in no problem. First ballot.
Spot on
He shouldn't sniff the Hall.
113-110 W/L record.
Has led the league in INT's three times (never led it in TD passes).
Lifetime passer rating of 83.9, which is pretty bad by today's standards.
Has never been considered one of the best QB's in the league.
Lifetime YPA of 7.0 is pretty mediocre.
Manning will be an interesting test case. Most QB's generally are first-ballot guys. Even the ones you mention 'all yes' on will take about 2 minutes (combined) to decide. Eli could be this generations Ken Anderson.Never elite. Same with Statpadford & to a lesser extent Flacco, Romo and Ryan.
None of those guys.
Rivers is an interesting debate IMO. Wilson, who knows. Luck - not bloody likely.
Brady, Brees, Peyton, Ben and Rodgers are all yes.
I would add Jim Plunkett to that list. (not meaning to hijack the thread).He deserves to be in. Ben also.
Good point. Other than TD passes - Rivers is way ahead culmulative & 5.4% to 4.7% - their career arcs are similar. With a couple more productive seasons after Rivers retires he’ll catch him in most categories, plus he’s got hardware (RotY & MVP) Rivers will never match.Question: Why is Rivers an interesting debate, but not Ryan?
Context.Joe Namath is in the HOF with horrible stats and one game (albeit the most important game in NFL history) that put him in. If he's in the HOF Eli has to be with what he's done. /thread
I was alive then and you're right about the time being a factor. in retrospect it was fluff and he doesn't belong in the HOF.Context.
Namath always gets brought up in stats arguments but people who weren’t alive then don’t understand how the pre-internet world worked. NYC was the media & advertising capitol of the world & Broadway Joe was the sexiest man alive before the term existed. The $427K contract in 1965 was massive & helped nudge the merger talks along, the $10K ($75K? I’m middle aged lol) to shave his mustache off in a live commercial was a cultural event, the full length mink coat on the sideline, et al.
None of those things should be factors in HoF consideration but for a brief period he was the Willie Mays / Ali / Arnold Palmer / Howe / Chamberlain of his sport. With 20/20 hindsight it seems like a bad, horrible choice but in the period he was larger than life.
I think that's one thing that gets lost a bit when discussing Namath...obviously his on-field performance and stats have aged...poorly. But his contribution not only to football, but sports in general remains enormous. I can't think of another athlete who was as instrumental as attracting women to the sport as Namath and his brazen off-field image pretty much was the seed for the modern day athlete.Context.
Namath always gets brought up in stats arguments but people who weren’t alive then don’t understand how the pre-internet world worked. NYC was the media & advertising capitol of the world & Broadway Joe was the sexiest man alive before the term existed. The $427K contract in 1965 was massive & helped nudge the merger talks along, the $10K ($75K? I’m middle aged lol) to shave his mustache off in a live commercial was a cultural event, the full length mink coat on the sideline, et al.
None of those things should be factors in HoF consideration but for a brief period he was the Willie Mays / Ali / Arnold Palmer / Howe / Chamberlain of his sport. With 20/20 hindsight it seems like a bad, horrible choice but in the period he was larger than life.
I agree with this 100%. Now we have to ask the question whether we can on occasion ignore stats in today's game and replace it with cultural perspective and place in history when considering players for the HOF? If the answer is no, then placing Namath in the HOF was a mistake.I think that's one thing that gets lost a bit when discussing Namath...obviously his on-field performance and stats have aged...poorly. But his contribution not only to football, but sports in general remains enormous. I can't think of another athlete who was as instrumental as attracting women to the sport as Namath and his brazen off-field image pretty much was the seed for the modern day athlete.
He was the right guy, at the right time, in the right place who was absolutely central to the expansion of NFL football as the nations past time. From a cultural perspective, I'd argue he belongs in the Top 10 most important and significant figures in NFL history.
Well if off the field considerations are part of it then Eli should definitely be in for giving the world dopey face memes/gifs. Life would be much sadder without those.I think that's one thing that gets lost a bit when discussing Namath...obviously his on-field performance and stats have aged...poorly. But his contribution not only to football, but sports in general remains enormous. I can't think of another athlete who was as instrumental as attracting women to the sport as Namath and his brazen off-field image pretty much was the seed for the modern day athlete.
He was the right guy, at the right time, in the right place who was absolutely central to the expansion of NFL football as the nations past time. From a cultural perspective, I'd argue he belongs in the Top 10 most important and significant figures in NFL history.
Particularly at the QB position, I think it will be interesting to see how guys like Rivers/Ryan/Eli are evaluated. In large part because when they retire, they will undoubtedly be able to say 'we're in the Top 5-6 in these passing categories of all-time'. But all-time doesn't really mean much because rules changes have essentially made statistical comparisons between eras of football irrelevant. When Namath retired, he was 6th on the all-time passing yards leaders.I agree with this 100%. Now we have to ask the question whether we can on occasion ignore stats in today's game and replace it with cultural perspective and place in history when considering players for the HOF? If the answer is no, then placing Namath in the HOF was a mistake.
I guess Dilfer is in. Probably Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Foles.He should barely get in IMO. For many years that man has played with basically no OL and no running game. He has 2 Superbowls with "meh" team rosters. He hasn't ever been put in a position to really thrive--and yet he found a way to win 2 rings. For me--that alone is enough for him to barely get in.
That’s fair.I was alive then and you're right about the time being a factor. in retrospect it was fluff and he doesn't belong in the HOF.
Stafford, 2011Case in point: 4 QB's have 5000 yard passing seasons in NFL history (Peyton, Brady, Brees, Marino).
None of those guys have the cumulative career stats that Eli does either. Eli started a ton of games in a row- and while his breakdown of averages per game are not really impressive- his career totals are. You can’t discount the value of being available to play week after week over a long nfl career like Eli has. That’s a rarity in the NFL.I guess Dilfer is in. Probably Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Foles.
?We're letting his last year or two behind an awful line for terrible teams cloud judgement here.
Oh they won two also?I guess Dilfer is in. Probably Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Foles.
Boom. Done. On to the next subject.He’s in the top 10 in passing yards and passing TDs, and has two Super Bowl MVP’s. He’s getting in.