What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Faceoff 2! Redraft..Most likely to crack top 20 (1 Viewer)

Most likely to crack top 20 at qb this year

  • Sims

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rivers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neither

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

bigreese82

Footballguy
Which Young Gun would you bet on cracking top 20 at qb? Sims or Rivers? neither one? Dilfer, Harrington,Leftwich and Carr all hovered around the 20th ranked qb last year..depending on scoring system...Can Sims or Rivers make the leap...In a redraft, they should be tremendous value :popcorn:

Vote and make your case for this year

 
I went with Rivers, he has the benefit of the best RB in the game (IMO) and the best TE. I expect him to utilize both heavily in the short passing game.

 
I voted neither but only because I didn't read the post first. I thought you were asking top 20 overall, not just QB's.

I think Simms is the safer pick. I'm a big Rivers fan but I expect him to struggle a bit in his first season of full time duty. So if I could change my vote I'd say Simms.

 
Simms, by a country mile..better WR's, top ten RB ( caddy), better coaches and more wide opened offensive philosophy. Gruden turned Rich Gannon into the NFL MVP. He's going to work wonders with Simms too.

Rivers has ZERO experience as a starting QB, and will struggle mightily in 2006.

every other Q B not named Marino or Roethlisberger ( spelling?) has struggled in first few seasons as a starter..Aikman. Phil Simms. Manning(s). Palmer.

Rivers is no different,IMO.

 
Simms, by a country mile..better WR's, top ten RB ( caddy), better coaches and more wide opened offensive philosophy. Gruden turned Rich Gannon into the NFL MVP. He's going to work wonders with Simms too.

Rivers has ZERO experience as a starting QB, and will struggle mightily in 2006.

every other Q B not named Marino or Roethlisberger ( spelling?) has struggled in first few seasons as a starter..Aikman. Phil Simms. Manning(s). Palmer.

Rivers is no different,IMO.
I suggest you revisit your football history book and look at how QB that SAT a year did in their first years as starters. . .Culpepper, Palmer, Brady, Favre, Green, all down? Other guys that hardly played and then started include Delhomme, Brunell, and Brad Johnson who also fared pretty well as first year starters.

Rivers is entering his third year in the SAME coach in the SAME system with predominently the SAME personnel on offense (unless you condiser the loss of Reche Caldwell life threatening). SD had a Top 10-12 passing attack and still has Gates and LT. They still play in the high scoring AFC West and should have a lot more favorable schedule this year.

Since people have not gotten a chance to see Rivers play yet, the safe conclusion to make is he will be a dud this season.

SD had 600 more passing yards and 10 more passing TD than TB did last year. IMO, that's a sizable advantage that will play in Rivers' favor, even if there are those that think TB has more talent on offense.

 
Simms, by a country mile..better WR's, top ten RB ( caddy), better coaches and more wide opened offensive philosophy. Gruden turned Rich Gannon into the NFL MVP. He's going to work wonders with Simms too.

Rivers has ZERO experience as a starting QB, and will struggle mightily in 2006.

every other Q B not named Marino or Roethlisberger ( spelling?) has struggled in first few seasons as a starter..Aikman. Phil Simms. Manning(s). Palmer.

Rivers is no different,IMO.
I suggest you revisit your football history book and look at how QB that SAT a year did in their first years as starters. . .Culpepper, Palmer, Brady, Favre, Green, all down? Other guys that hardly played and then started include Delhomme, Brunell, and Brad Johnson who also fared pretty well as first year starters.

Rivers is entering his third year in the SAME coach in the SAME system with predominently the SAME personnel on offense (unless you condiser the loss of Reche Caldwell life threatening). SD had a Top 10-12 passing attack and still has Gates and LT. They still play in the high scoring AFC West and should have a lot more favorable schedule this year.

Since people have not gotten a chance to see Rivers play yet, the safe conclusion to make is he will be a dud this season.

SD had 600 more passing yards and 10 more passing TD than TB did last year. IMO, that's a sizable advantage that will play in Rivers' favor, even if there are those that think TB has more talent on offense.
:thumbup: I voted BOTH.... Top 20 isn't anything crazy if they stay healthy.
 
The safe bet is Rivers I think.

I think cracking top 20 as a first year starter as a non running QB is tough though. Palmer/Brady numbers are about what you'd expect as upside. They were right around QB20 playing 14 & 15 game seasons.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Rivers will be Top 10 . . .
That is quite a high value for someone with so little game day experience and no real stars at the WR position. Coach Shottenheimer is also a ball control, ground game guy. I expect SD to degrade some this year. LT2 is great, but I think Brees helped make Gates the player that he is. Based on the recent SSL drafts, I'd put Gates as the most over-rated player in the FF game right now. There is simply no guarantee that he will continue the same production with the much less experienced Rivers at QB.

ALOT of the passing stats you quoted in that other response left to New Orleans. ALOT of the players you listed had MUCH better WRs to throw to. SD WRs are average at best. The SD QB is now the 4th best in the division.

It would be a real surprise if he performed top 10 IMO.

 
I think Rivers will be Top 10 . . .
That is quite a high value for someone with so little game day experience and no real stars at the WR position. Coach Shottenheimer is also a ball control, ground game guy. I expect SD to degrade some this year. LT2 is great, but I think Brees helped make Gates the player that he is. Based on the recent SSL drafts, I'd put Gates as the most over-rated player in the FF game right now. There is simply no guarantee that he will continue the same production with the much less experienced Rivers at QB.

ALOT of the passing stats you quoted in that other response left to New Orleans. ALOT of the players you listed had MUCH better WRs to throw to. SD WRs are average at best. The SD QB is now the 4th best in the division.

It would be a real surprise if he performed top 10 IMO.
How are the Chiefs wide receivers? Are they any better than the Chargers? How often did KC run the ball? How'd Trent Green do the last few years? He's ranked 8th, 3rd, 4th, and 8th the last few years. SD had 55 fewer rushing attempts than the Chiefs did last year. Schottenheimer's teams over the years have ranked Top 12 in passing yards and passing TD 6 times. He's also ranked Top 10 in scoring 9 times. He plays to the strengths of his team, and in some years he's gone to the ground, some years to the air, and some years a more balanced attack. IMO, the Bolts would not have let Brees walk away so easily (and for nothing mind you) if they did not have confidence in Rivers.

As I see it, Rivers has the arm to open up the field more than Brees did, so I suspect we see some longer routes that could open up the middle of the field some for Gates. I do think that Gates may suffer the first few weeks of the season until everyone gets on the same page, but with the following schedule I still see Rivers having some banner weeks:

Mon 9/11 at Oakland 10:15 pm

Sun 9/17 Tennessee 4:15 pm

Bye

Sun 10/1 at Baltimore 1:00 pm

Sun 10/8 Pittsburgh 8:15 pm

Sun 10/15 at San Francisco 4:15 pm

Sun 10/22 at Kansas City 1:00 pm

Sun 10/29 St. Louis 4:05 pm

Sun 11/5 Cleveland 4:15 pm

Sun 11/12 at Cincinnati 1:00 pm

Sun 11/19 at Denver 4:15 pm

Sun 11/26 Oakland 4:05 pm

Sun 12/3 at Buffalo 1:00 pm

Sun 12/10 Denver 4:15 pm

Sun 12/17 Kansas City 4:05 pm

Sun 12/24 at Seattle 4:15 pm

Sun 12/31 Arizona 4:15 pm

 
:thumbup: I voted BOTH.... Top 20 isn't anything crazy if they stay healthy.
Me too. If both guys stay healthy, top 20 is fairly easy when you factor the amount of QBs that wont finish the season due to injury or ineffective play. I see Rivers as the risky pick out of the 2 simply because we have never seen him play... for the most part. I do like his upside/talent more though. Sims seems safe in that he does have 1 solid season under his belt where he ranked as QB27 in only 11 games. I just don't happen to like his situation as much as Rivers in SD or his talent.
 
I think Rivers will be Top 10 . . .
only 1 other staff guy has him in their TOP 15 at qb for redraft :eek: Where do you see Sims?
I still haven't formed a firm opinion on Simms, but for now it's not as high as Rivers. I hope to iron out a set of rankings that I can live with over the long weekend.Bear in mind, however, that the scoring difference between the middle QBs over a full season could be miniscule. Last year, the scoring difference between #7 and #14 was about a single ppg, and you could just about have picked names out of a hat it was so close. It may be that way again, so there could be 100-200 yard or 2 TD difference between a bunch of QB in the rankings.

Simms as a starter did not rank in the Top 25 in terms of ppg, so he will have to show a fair amount of improvement to jump up in my rankings.

 
I think Rivers will be Top 10 . . .
That is quite a high value for someone with so little game day experience and no real stars at the WR position. Coach Shottenheimer is also a ball control, ground game guy.
I think that's a fallacy. There's this perception that Schotty is a very conservative, ball-control type coach, mostly dating back to his days in KC... but in San Diego, he's actually been a very progressive, aggressive coach. Lots of chucking, lots of trickery, lots of misdirection, lots of what-have-you.Let's not forget that Tomlinson threw three touchdown passes early last season. The halfback pass is generally not the hallmark of a conservative playcaller.

 
I think Rivers will be Top 10 . . .
:eek: You've usually got sound reasoning behind your picks but this one really stands out. Did you explain this in another thread?
Read this thread if you didn't already.
I did. The Chargers have a nice schedule. I just wasn't sure if you'd presented all this (and perhaps more) in the Rivers bandwagon thread or somewhere else.
 
I think Rivers will be Top 10 . . .
:eek: You've usually got sound reasoning behind your picks but this one really stands out. Did you explain this in another thread?
Read this thread if you didn't already.
I did. The Chargers have a nice schedule. I just wasn't sure if you'd presented all this (and perhaps more) in the Rivers bandwagon thread or somewhere else.
I think this year in particular there are very few true stud QB, and beyond Manning there is a lot of question marks for many teams. Last year fantasy QB scoring was not that great compared to 2004. Now imagine similar scoring but with a lot of teams with ????For example

NE - Will they run the ball more and better (if so Brady down)

BUF - Who is the starter (if it matters)

MIA - When will Culpepper play and how well will he do on a new team?

NYJ - Who is the QB and will it matter for fantasy purposes?

IND - Manning is still a stud

JAX - Can Leftwich stay healthy and who replaces Smith?

HOU - Could be more pass oriented but hasn't shown much yet in prior seasons

TEN - Who is the starter?

PIT - Big Ben could be a decent option if the team runs less, but will they?

CIN - How healthy and productive will Palmer be?

BAL - And the starter will be?

CLE - Does Frye scare anyone?

OAK - Many are down on Brooks (although I'm not)

KC - New coach and an aging OL and QB

DEN - Plummer should be fine

SD - Rivers with no competition in the same offense

PHI - McNabb without Owens = ???

NYG - Another Manning that should be solid

DAL - I am high on Bledsoe (higher than most)

WAS - Brunell is an ok NFL QB but not a force in fantasy

CAR - Delhomme can rank anwhere from 5-15 in my book

TB - Simms was mediocre last year

ATL - Vick still needs to pass more . . . Top 10 but how much higher?

NO - Brees in a whole new system and is he healthy?

CHI - Has not done much passing wise in a long time

MIN - Johnson put up average numbers and has a new scheme and marginal WR

GB - Favre lost his primary target

DET - Don't bet against a Martz offense, but is there a Top 10 QB in the house?

SEA - Hasselbeck is solid

STL - Bulger should still be decent, but will the team run a lot more?

SF - A long way away

ARI - Edge shgould cut down on passing attempts. Can Warner stay healthy?

I don't see many locks for Top 10 QB, and I don't see it unreasonable that SD undergoing few changes (compared to many other teams) will see a major dropoff in their passing totals.

 
Simms, by a country mile..better WR's, top ten RB ( caddy), better coaches and more wide opened offensive philosophy. Gruden turned Rich Gannon into the NFL MVP. He's going to work wonders with Simms too.

Rivers has ZERO experience as a starting QB, and will struggle mightily in 2006.

every other Q B not named Marino or Roethlisberger ( spelling?) has struggled in first few seasons as a starter..Aikman. Phil Simms. Manning(s). Palmer.

Rivers is no different,IMO.
I suggest you revisit your football history book and look at how QB that SAT a year did in their first years as starters. . .Culpepper, Palmer, Brady, Favre, Green, all down? Other guys that hardly played and then started include Delhomme, Brunell, and Brad Johnson who also fared pretty well as first year starters.

Rivers is entering his third year in the SAME coach in the SAME system with predominently the SAME personnel on offense (unless you condiser the loss of Reche Caldwell life threatening). SD had a Top 10-12 passing attack and still has Gates and LT. They still play in the high scoring AFC West and should have a lot more favorable schedule this year.

Since people have not gotten a chance to see Rivers play yet, the safe conclusion to make is he will be a dud this season.

SD had 600 more passing yards and 10 more passing TD than TB did last year. IMO, that's a sizable advantage that will play in Rivers' favor, even if there are those that think TB has more talent on offense.
thanks for the suggestion,I took you up on the offer , I think you need to do more homework on the subject before you offer suggestions :thumbdown: Aikman first 3 years as a starter:

2360 yards, 15 int, 10 tds, 69.6 rating.

Palmer, in his 2nd pro year -first as a starter- went 2897 yards, 18 int,18 td, 77.3 rating.

he also is a HEISMAN trophy winner.

Culpepper played with two of the greatest WR's to ever suit up, Chris Carter and Randy Moss. In his first 3 years as a starter, threw for 52 ints to 65 tds..he did toss 33 td to 16 int his first season as a starting QB..great stats.again,he played with randy moss and chris carter, and frankly, the only WR/TE SD has that is worth mentioning, is Gates..LT is terrific, too..but show me anyone comparable to hof'er's Moss and Carter..

Brady, in his first full season as a starter, threw for 2843 yards, 18 tds, 12 ints, 86.5 rating.

Favre threw for 70 tds and 51 ints in his first 3 years as a starter in GB..In his first year as a starter, he threw for just 3227 yards, 18 td, 13 int.

Delhomme - first year as a starter in carolina, threw for 3219 yards, 19 td to 16 int.

Brunell, in hist first year as a starter in Jax, played 13 games, threw for 2168 yards, 15 td,7 int. the following season, those numbers worked out to 4367 yards, 19 td 20 int.

Trent Green gets a passing grade, 3441 yards, 23 td, 11 ints in washington , 1998, hist first year as a starter.

in KC, under a new offense, 3783 yards, 17 td,24 ints.

basically,you're looking at approximately 18-20 tds, 12-15 ints from Rivers if history is any indicator..so in that regard, I don't think he has a snowball's chance in hell of cracking the top 10 QB rankings.

You are already assuming Rivers is in the ranks of people like Culpepper, Palmer,Brady?!?! I simply don't. its just a difference of opinion. we could be splitting hairs here anyways, both could finish in top ten for all we know, right? I think you're under the impression that you can just plug a guy like Rivers in to Bree's position and he'll be a mirrored image of the former starting QB, tossing 25+ tds with a low int value..and that's just not happening, IMO..

you'll be lucky to get 20 tds out of hm in 2006..he COULD be a pro bowl player for the next decade, but as for him flipping the switch and becoming troy aikman or favre overnight, is a pipe dream.

 
Simms, by a country mile..better WR's, top ten RB ( caddy), better coaches and more wide opened offensive philosophy. Gruden turned Rich Gannon into the NFL MVP. He's going to work wonders with Simms too.

Rivers has ZERO experience as a starting QB, and will struggle mightily in 2006.

every other Q B not named Marino or Roethlisberger ( spelling?) has struggled in first few seasons as a starter..Aikman. Phil Simms. Manning(s). Palmer.

Rivers is no different,IMO.
I suggest you revisit your football history book and look at how QB that SAT a year did in their first years as starters. . .Culpepper, Palmer, Brady, Favre, Green, all down? Other guys that hardly played and then started include Delhomme, Brunell, and Brad Johnson who also fared pretty well as first year starters.

Rivers is entering his third year in the SAME coach in the SAME system with predominently the SAME personnel on offense (unless you condiser the loss of Reche Caldwell life threatening). SD had a Top 10-12 passing attack and still has Gates and LT. They still play in the high scoring AFC West and should have a lot more favorable schedule this year.

Since people have not gotten a chance to see Rivers play yet, the safe conclusion to make is he will be a dud this season.

SD had 600 more passing yards and 10 more passing TD than TB did last year. IMO, that's a sizable advantage that will play in Rivers' favor, even if there are those that think TB has more talent on offense.
thanks for the suggestion,I took you up on the offer , I think you need to do more homework on the subject before you offer suggestions :thumbdown: Aikman first 3 years as a starter:

2360 yards, 15 int, 10 tds, 69.6 rating.

Palmer, in his 2nd pro year -first as a starter- went 2897 yards, 18 int,18 td, 77.3 rating.

he also is a HEISMAN trophy winner.

Culpepper played with two of the greatest WR's to ever suit up, Chris Carter and Randy Moss. In his first 3 years as a starter, threw for 52 ints to 65 tds..he did toss 33 td to 16 int his first season as a starting QB..great stats.again,he played with randy moss and chris carter, and frankly, the only WR/TE SD has that is worth mentioning, is Gates..LT is terrific, too..but show me anyone comparable to hof'er's Moss and Carter..

Brady, in his first full season as a starter, threw for 2843 yards, 18 tds, 12 ints, 86.5 rating.

Favre threw for 70 tds and 51 ints in his first 3 years as a starter in GB..In his first year as a starter, he threw for just 3227 yards, 18 td, 13 int.

Delhomme - first year as a starter in carolina, threw for 3219 yards, 19 td to 16 int.

Brunell, in hist first year as a starter in Jax, played 13 games, threw for 2168 yards, 15 td,7 int. the following season, those numbers worked out to 4367 yards, 19 td 20 int.

Trent Green gets a passing grade, 3441 yards, 23 td, 11 ints in washington , 1998, hist first year as a starter.

in KC, under a new offense, 3783 yards, 17 td,24 ints.

basically,you're looking at approximately 18-20 tds, 12-15 ints from Rivers if history is any indicator..so in that regard, I don't think he has a snowball's chance in hell of cracking the top 10 QB rankings.

You are already assuming Rivers is in the ranks of people like Culpepper, Palmer,Brady?!?! I simply don't. its just a difference of opinion. we could be splitting hairs here anyways, both could finish in top ten for all we know, right? I think you're under the impression that you can just plug a guy like Rivers in to Bree's position and he'll be a mirrored image of the former starting QB, tossing 25+ tds with a low int value..and that's just not happening, IMO..

you'll be lucky to get 20 tds out of hm in 2006..he COULD be a pro bowl player for the next decade, but as for him flipping the switch and becoming troy aikman or favre overnight, is a pipe dream.
I never mentioned Aikman, as he was thrown to the wolves his first year and did not sit much as a rookie.As for the other guys, first year as a starting QB rankings:

Favre #7

Culpepper #1

TGreen #7

These other guys did not start every game, but based on ppg their ranking over a full season would have made them:

Brunell #3

Palmer #16

Brady #19

I also think Brady was asked to hold the fort down initially, as there was no plan to keep him a starter but Bledsoe ended up staying out. If we ignore his first three games when he mostly handed the ball off, he averaged about 16 ppg or equilvalent to the QB 11 for the season.

IMO, a guy that has two full years to learn the system and starting the year off as the clear #1 starter has an advantage over other QB that are rookies.

For those that don't remember his college bio:

- ACC Player of the Year as a senior with 4,491/34/7 passing totals.

- Led the nation with 72% completion % as well as passing efficiency (170.49).

- Set ACC single-season records for total offense (4,600), total touchdowns (37), passing yards and completion percentage.

- Threw 124 straight passes without an interception.

- Junior totals were 62.7%/3,353/20/10 after 62.5 percent/2,586/16/7 as a sophomore.

- Second-leading passer in NCAA history with 13,484 career passing yards.

Rivers may not end up Top 10, but I suspect he should be pretty close come end of the year if he stays healthy.

 
Who looks to have the easier passing schedule? Seems like we are up in the air on the qbs but who has the best schedule and opportunity?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top