RBs to watch: Michael Bush; Addai; Bradshaw; Deangelo W.It is almost impossible to project the value of these players until we know where they are playing.
It's true it's tough to project these guys w/out knowing their ultimate destination. However, this is a fantasy football message board, and much of what goes on here is predicting what players will do. Let's try to predict where these RBs might end up.RBs-Williams I see as the premier FA RB available. I can see him being successful (FF-wise) in any number of places. Bush would, IMO, have the most FF impact on a team where he would be the main RB, or the lead RB in a RBBC. Bradshaw would appear to be a RB that can have FF success as part of a RBBC (and while I believe he could do fine as THE RB, I don't forsee NFL teams giving him that job). Addai, IMO, will not be in high demand. His "success" seems to be more a result of the Colt's offense, rather than his unique talents.The teams that appear to have a "need" at the RB position are

enver-with reports suggesting that Moreno may not be the answer as a full-time RB, Williams could land there (especially) with Fox in town. However, I think Bush would be a good fit there, with Moreno having a change-of-pace, 3rd-down role. I don't see Addai or Bradshaw as good fits there.Indy-with Addai possibly being a FA (and not being a stud), and Brown being unimpressive so far. I think Williams or Bradshaw would be good fits here. I think Bush could do well here (his hands are under-rated), but I believe he is viewed as a big back with little to offer in the receiving department, and that won't work in Indy's offense. If none of the FA's go here, I believe Addai will re-sign.Miami-with neither Brown or Williams under contract for next season (yet), rookie Daniel Thomas (who also isn't under contract) is the lead RB in Miami. I believe that they will retain one of their RBs, or sign another to be part of a RBBC with Thomas. Miami doesn't have a strong passing game, and they need to be able to run the ball to be successful. I think any of the 4 FAs we are discussing could be successful there, but (assuming Thomas is signed, and is Miami's main guy) I would be surprised if Williams or Bradshaw ends up there as a complimentary back. I also don't see Bush taking a 2nd-fiddle role when he has done that for the past several years. Addai could be a possibility, as his skill-set seems to compliment Thomas, but I really don't like him much as a runner (just my opinion-Miami may feel differently).NE-the RB situation here is as clear as it usually is, which means not at all. They drafted 2 RBs, but neither has the look of a STUD. They haven't relied on 1 RB for a long time, though, so they may be following the same old M.O. If they were to sign one of these FAs, the player that would excite FF owners would be Williams. I don't see them doing that though. (I don't see them signing any of these 4, to be honest)Dallas-while the 'Boys have Felix Jones, it appears that MBIII may not return. If Jones isn't confident in Jones' ability to hold up to RB1 workload, he might be in the market for one of the FAs. If that is the case, I would think Bush would be the best fit. Jones, while a capable inside runner, would be best served being paired with a RB who would get the tough, short-yardage carries, thereby (hopefully) preserving Jones' health.GB-they have Grant coming back (I think), and they have Starks who stepped up in the playoffs. Brandon Jackson may not return. While they don't NEED to sign a RB, their RB corps isn't super-impressive. I think Bradshaw would fit as a nice complement to Starks, but he might be too expensive. Williams (IMO) will definitely be too expensive, but Addai could be a cheaper alternative. I don't see any of them going there, to be honest.NYG-if Bradshaw doesn't resign, the Giants (IMO) will definitely be in the market for a RB. If they don't re-sign Bradshaw, I doubt they'd cut/trade Jacobs, so I would think they'd be in the market for a change-of-pace type back. I don't think they'd pay Williams enough, but Addai could fit. (I think they'll re-sign Bradshaw & keep Jacobs).Seattle-While I'm not overly impressed with Forsett or Lynch (playoff highlight run not-withstanding), I think Seattle will stand pat with those 2, and won't sign a FA.Washington-I don't see Shanahan signing a FA, but if he does, I would think that his order of preference would be Williams, Bradshaw, and then Bush (cost being a huge factor).