I am fading CJ in gpp as his ownership will probably be too high. My Rams sneak pick this week is not a RB.So anyone guessing between how the carries will be split between Gurley and CJ Anderson? Based on Anderson's stellar performance last week I would almost expect half/half. Not sure whether Gurley is worth paying more for than CJ at this point.
Isn't NO rush D decent? Not sure either are worth it as they force Goff to win the game as he hasn't looked that great over the last several weeks. I guess that means Gurley could catch a couple but not sure about the gpp upside yet. On both sites I would lean WR in the flex this week, but still staring at this.AquaBliss said:So anyone guessing between how the carries will be split between Gurley and CJ Anderson? Based on Anderson's stellar performance last week I would almost expect half/half. Not sure whether Gurley is worth paying more for than CJ at this point.
All in on Gurley again. Dance with the one who brought you.Isn't NO rush D decent? Not sure either are worth it as they force Goff to win the game as he hasn't looked that great over the last several weeks. I guess that means Gurley could catch a couple but not sure about the gpp upside yet. On both sites I would lean WR in the flex this week, but still staring at this.
I think the Rams will need everything they can get out of Gurley, and he'll get 95% of the carries.AquaBliss said:So anyone guessing between how the carries will be split between Gurley and CJ Anderson? Based on Anderson's stellar performance last week I would almost expect half/half. Not sure whether Gurley is worth paying more for than CJ at this point.
One of the contrarian GPP ideas I'm kicking around is 2 TE's; Kelce/Gronk or Kelce/Everett or Higbee. Definitely a big long shot, but, I'd like to think that Gronkowski will catch another TD sooner or later. KC just might be that opportunity.Isn't NO rush D decent? Not sure either are worth it as they force Goff to win the game as he hasn't looked that great over the last several weeks. I guess that means Gurley could catch a couple but not sure about the gpp upside yet. On both sites I would lean WR in the flex this week, but still staring at this.
TE seems like the ideal spot to go contrarian this week. I think you almost have to fade Kelce in gpp and hope that one of the other TE options gets a score to two.One of the contrarian GPP ideas I'm kicking around is 2 TE's; Kelce/Gronk or Kelce/Everett or Higbee. Definitely a big long shot, but, I'd like to think that Gronkowski will catch another TD sooner or later. KC just might be that opportunity.
CJ should be around 10-15% ownership. So for gpp, he actually could be a good play. Gurley will be around 45%.I think the fact that all you guys want to fade CJ Anderson is a reason to play him This is a good sample size to determine contrarian picks.
I think a pod had a good point with the weather. If it is close to 0 degrees, it slants to NE and their rushing game. If it's in the 20s, it goes a bit more to kc.Hope no one minds if I piggyback with some DraftKings talk rather than make a thread- rolling out 20 $1 lineups like i did last week. Last week I had a good finish (79/178k) but had way too much marlon Mack. This week it’s a guy in the same price range- Edelman. He’s in 16/20 lineups and I’m having a hard time replacing him with options like Demarcus Robinson or josh Reynolds. I have those guys in a few cards, but don’t want too much.
Hard to not play kelce or gronk vs the other options. Paying up for kelce in about 1/2 of my lineups but then am forced to get creative at wr usually.
How will these games play out? NE pounds Michel and uses short passing game to keep KC offense on the sideline? Will the cold weather affect what KC does?
You can make a case that LA and NO could both try to play ball control to keep the other off the field. More likely to be a shootout- I’m probably targeting more flyers from this game like Reynolds or trequan Smith, kirkwood, Higbee, watson etc. I’m having a hard time putting these guys in.
Hope that isn't the case, as I am 100% on fade of him. I might be throwing in a showdown LU with him as a cpt as a hedge. Don't have much Gurley either. Needless to say, I don't have a ton of money going on this idea today.Does Hill come into play with watson out? Or the other guy whose name I don’t remember, is he a better blocker? Bump ginn or Smith? Still think you have to pay up for kelce....
Yeah, me too. I had three $10 tickets. Burkhead rescued me with a TD that netted back $19.Brutal day for me, but whatever- Pats in the SB yet again!