Thanks, I completely forgot about FDPs.I'm using all the FDPs I earned during the season to enter contests this week. Comes out to $120 in free entries![]()
How do those work, is it roughly 1,000 FDP = $1?Thanks, I completely forgot about FDPs.I'm using all the FDPs I earned during the season to enter contests this week. Comes out to $120 in free entries![]()
I saw on Rotoworld Newswire that Sherman would be on the rookie Adams. Makes Jordy a decent play then.Newton was just fine against the Seahawks in terms of points....hard to think Rodgers won't be able to at least chuck some darts that stick. I'll take that in a GPP or two with Cobb as part of the stack.
I saw on Rotoworld Newswire that Sherman would be on the rookie Adams. Makes Jordy a decent play then.Newton was just fine against the Seahawks in terms of points....hard to think Rodgers won't be able to at least chuck some darts that stick. I'll take that in a GPP or two with Cobb as part of the stack.
2400 FDP = $1How do those work, is it roughly 1,000 FDP = $1?Thanks, I completely forgot about FDPs.I'm using all the FDPs I earned during the season to enter contests this week. Comes out to $120 in free entries![]()
My best guesses. Rolling with Wilson in most my leagues.If NE decides to go run heavy who carries the load? Blount or Gray? BLOUNT, JONAS BEING A HEALTHY SCRATCH LAST WEEK WAS A GOOD INDICATOR IMO
Does Seatle put thier nickle DB on D Adams? SHERMAN ON ADAMS ACCORDING TO ROTO
Can Indy cover Gronk? NO, NOTHING CAN COVER GRONK
Will Rogers be able to move enough to avoid the Seat pass rush? NO
Will Wilson to Wilson continue to pay big? DOUBTFUL
Best K for the Week? VINNY
Wilson saves you the few extra bucks you'll need to get Gronk. If anyone is playing in a cash league and not taking Gronk this week, let me save you some money. Don't play, and just mail me half of what you were going to bet on your daily game.My best guesses. Rolling with Wilson in most my leagues.If NE decides to go run heavy who carries the load? Blount or Gray? BLOUNT, JONAS BEING A HEALTHY SCRATCH LAST WEEK WAS A GOOD INDICATOR IMO
Does Seatle put thier nickle DB on D Adams? SHERMAN ON ADAMS ACCORDING TO ROTO
Can Indy cover Gronk? NO, NOTHING CAN COVER GRONK
Will Rogers be able to move enough to avoid the Seat pass rush? NO
Will Wilson to Wilson continue to pay big? DOUBTFUL
Best K for the Week? VINNY
About what you have to do to get Gronk in the lineup though.this GPP is laughable
Andrew Luck
Marshawn Lynch
LeGarrette Blount
TY Hilton
Davante Adams
Kevin Norwood
Rob Gronkowski
Gostkowski
Patriots
That's what my goal was. The highest scoring players this week imo will be Gronk and Lynch, and I wanted to put those guys in a lineup with the highest hvalue stack according to Tremblay. Then figured out the restAbout what you have to do to get Gronk in the lineup though.this GPP is laughable
Andrew Luck
Marshawn Lynch
LeGarrette Blount
TY Hilton
Davante Adams
Kevin Norwood
Rob Gronkowski
Gostkowski
Patriots
If he even gets pressed into action against Seattle's defense, what do you think his best case scenario is? I'm thinking it's pretty horrible.I will likely create a lineup with Flynn in it for a few GPPs... you know... just in case
Yeah, but the salary freed up is nice.If he even gets pressed into action against Seattle's defense, what do you think his best case scenario is? I'm thinking it's pretty horrible.I will likely create a lineup with Flynn in it for a few GPPs... you know... just in case
I agree. I assume you have to roll Blount or Vereen here. I'm very comfortable with Blount. In particular if Gray remains inactive.I don't know, I got Brady, Lynch, Edelman, Gronk and even Seattle's defense and I don't think it looks too shabby.
Ya you can do that version or Herron with three WRs in the 5000s. You even get Hauschka too.jeaton6 said:I agree. I assume you have to roll Blount or Vereen here. I'm very comfortable with Blount. In particular if Gray remains inactive.w3junky said:I don't know, I got Brady, Lynch, Edelman, Gronk and even Seattle's defense and I don't think it looks too shabby.
I think you have the contest type wrong.johnnyboy8102 said:Cash games may need a Cribbs (kick return TD?) & Colts Defense stack to win it big this week!! (I am not suggesting anyone do this though!)
I tried that last week. Obviously didn't work out well.Keerock said:I will likely create a lineup with Flynn in it for a few GPPs... you know... just in case
As I intimated above, I'm not sure there would be much of a difference in his score whether he plays or sits this week.I tried that last week. Obviously didn't work out well.Keerock said:I will likely create a lineup with Flynn in it for a few GPPs... you know... just in case
So you essentially punt QB to not have to use any of the <7k WRs?As I intimated above, I'm not sure there would be much of a difference in his score whether he plays or sits this week.I tried that last week. Obviously didn't work out well.Keerock said:I will likely create a lineup with Flynn in it for a few GPPs... you know... just in case
Whoops my mistake.I think you have the contest type wrong. Why not?johnnyboy8102 said:Cash games may need a Cribbs (kick return TD?) & Colts Defense stack to win it big this week!! (I am not suggesting anyone do this though!)
I'm in the same boat. He is a lock for 15+ points a week with an unlimited ceiling. I also think his price point this week is so high he might not be well owned. Could be a difference maker. I made all my dough in weeks 12-17 and gronk along with ODB were regulars in all my lineups. He's just too good.Not sure I can bring myself to play any cash games without Gronk...
Yeah... usually means you have to punt a spot. I'm currently looking at Moncreif, Wayne, Lockette, Turbin and Starks.I'm in the same boat. He is a lock for 15+ points a week with an unlimited ceiling. I also think his price point this week is so high he might not be well owned. Could be a difference maker. I made all my dough in weeks 12-17 and gronk along with ODB were regulars in all my lineups. He's just too good.Not sure I can bring myself to play any cash games without Gronk...
Norwood might be a sneaky play too with Richardson outYeah... usually means you have to punt a spot. I'm currently looking at Moncreif, Wayne, Lockette, Turbin and Starks.I'm in the same boat. He is a lock for 15+ points a week with an unlimited ceiling. I also think his price point this week is so high he might not be well owned. Could be a difference maker. I made all my dough in weeks 12-17 and gronk along with ODB were regulars in all my lineups. He's just too good.Not sure I can bring myself to play any cash games without Gronk...
To get Brady + Gronk + Lynch I found I had to go "deep" on WR's and hope.. Then again it is $1GPP so that's the ideaYeah... usually means you have to punt a spot. I'm currently looking at Moncreif, Wayne, Lockette, Turbin and Starks.I'm in the same boat. He is a lock for 15+ points a week with an unlimited ceiling. I also think his price point this week is so high he might not be well owned. Could be a difference maker. I made all my dough in weeks 12-17 and gronk along with ODB were regulars in all my lineups. He's just too good.Not sure I can bring myself to play any cash games without Gronk...