After reading your post I made a similar stack. It's like a $25 lottery ticket on fan duel and I could see bridgewater getting some rushing yards as well to help his stats out.Is anyone else considering doing a Bridgewater/Jarius Wright stack in a league or two? Bridgwater is only $5,400 and Wright is $5,000. I know Bridgewater has struggled the past 2 games, but he's faced 2 pretty good defenses. Coming from a Bucs fan, our defense is an absolute mess and QB's have been having field days on us because guys are screwing up assignments and leaving receivers wide open. Not really sure how reliable Wright is either so if a Viking fan could chip in that'd be great. I know your o-line has been really struggling, but other than McCoy our pass rush sucks.
This stack would allow you to load up the rest of your team. A lineup I made earlier that I'm considering:
Teddy Bridgewater
Arian Foster
Andre Ellington/Lamar Miller (both are $7,400 with good match ups, leaning towards Ellington though, especially after Ben Tate let me down last week against the Jags)
Jordy Nelson
Dez Bryant
Jarius Wright
Jordan Reed
Dan Carpenter
Dolphins D
Not sure about the stack, but Bridgewater would be a good lottery play in a GPP. He has not looked very good the last couple weeks, so no one will probably be on him. Biggest problem is you don't know what receiver he is going to go to. You have Jennings who is only $500 higher and Patterson who is only $1000 higher and can break loose anywhere on the field. Not sure what Vikings team you are going to get week to week though so big ?Yea, some rushing yards would be a nice bonus. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he threw for at least 200 yards and 2 TD's, which would be great value at $5,400.
Another stack I really like is Luck/Hilton. I think this could be as good as Rodgers/Nelson if Wayne doesn't play, as Hilton should get a ton of targets. Stack would save you $1,000 and may not be as popular as Rodgers/Nelson.
Yea, definitely would only be a GPP play. Was wondering about their receiving situation so thanks for chiming in as a Vikings fan. Patterson has only had 2 catches in each of the past 4 games, so it is really hard to justify playing him at $6,000. I'd rather spend less on Jennings and Wright who have been more productive. This is definitely a risky play, but when you can stack the rest of your team with Jordy Nelson, Dez Bryant, Arian Foster and Andre Ellington, I think it is worth risking especially considering the matchup.Not sure about the stack, but Bridgewater would be a good lottery play in a GPP. He has not looked very good the last couple weeks, so no one will probably be on him. Biggest problem is you don't know what receiver he is going to go to. You have Jennings who is only $500 higher and Patterson who is only $1000 higher and can break loose anywhere on the field. Not sure what Vikings team you are going to get week to week though so big ?Yea, some rushing yards would be a nice bonus. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he threw for at least 200 yards and 2 TD's, which would be great value at $5,400.
Another stack I really like is Luck/Hilton. I think this could be as good as Rodgers/Nelson if Wayne doesn't play, as Hilton should get a ton of targets. Stack would save you $1,000 and may not be as popular as Rodgers/Nelson.
Bridgewater is definitely a good play in GPPs, I am just not sure about the stack. Granted, they would all be lower % players, biggest problem is that we don't know who will get the catches every week. I think you could find better value that Wright even at 5k.Yea, definitely would only be a GPP play. Was wondering about their receiving situation so thanks for chiming in as a Vikings fan. Patterson has only had 2 catches in each of the past 4 games, so it is really hard to justify playing him at $6,000. I'd rather spend less on Jennings and Wright who have been more productive. This is definitely a risky play, but when you can stack the rest of your team with Jordy Nelson, Dez Bryant, Arian Foster and Andre Ellington, I think it is worth risking especially considering the matchup.Not sure about the stack, but Bridgewater would be a good lottery play in a GPP. He has not looked very good the last couple weeks, so no one will probably be on him. Biggest problem is you don't know what receiver he is going to go to. You have Jennings who is only $500 higher and Patterson who is only $1000 higher and can break loose anywhere on the field. Not sure what Vikings team you are going to get week to week though so big ?Yea, some rushing yards would be a nice bonus. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he threw for at least 200 yards and 2 TD's, which would be great value at $5,400.
Another stack I really like is Luck/Hilton. I think this could be as good as Rodgers/Nelson if Wayne doesn't play, as Hilton should get a ton of targets. Stack would save you $1,000 and may not be as popular as Rodgers/Nelson.
I'm a Bucs fan so I watch them every week and our secondary is just pitiful right now. We look like Dallas' D last year trying to learn the cover 2. I mean twice this year, we have been down 28-0 after the 1st quarter for christs sake. Every QB we have faced has thrown for over 200 yards and has 2 TD's (with the exception of Ausitn Davis who threw for 230 yards but no TD's). If he can do that, he triples his value. I think this is a great game for Teddy to bounce back, as much as I hate to say it. There's a chance we look better coming off a bye week and the coaching fixes some of the mistakes, but I doubt it.
Yea, I know what you're saying. Who would you rather have at 5k? Kearse is really the only guy I see that I would consider, could be looking over some guys though. I'm having trouble finding value at WR this week, Lafell is an intriguing option, but he's probably the 4th option behind Gronk, Edelman and Vereen. Don't like too many guys in the 6,000-7,000 range either which is why I kind of want to spend for the big WR's.Bridgewater is definitely a good play in GPPs, I am just not sure about the stack. Granted, they would all be lower % players, biggest problem is that we don't know who will get the catches every week. I think you could find better value that Wright even at 5k.Yea, definitely would only be a GPP play. Was wondering about their receiving situation so thanks for chiming in as a Vikings fan. Patterson has only had 2 catches in each of the past 4 games, so it is really hard to justify playing him at $6,000. I'd rather spend less on Jennings and Wright who have been more productive. This is definitely a risky play, but when you can stack the rest of your team with Jordy Nelson, Dez Bryant, Arian Foster and Andre Ellington, I think it is worth risking especially considering the matchup.Not sure about the stack, but Bridgewater would be a good lottery play in a GPP. He has not looked very good the last couple weeks, so no one will probably be on him. Biggest problem is you don't know what receiver he is going to go to. You have Jennings who is only $500 higher and Patterson who is only $1000 higher and can break loose anywhere on the field. Not sure what Vikings team you are going to get week to week though so big ?Yea, some rushing yards would be a nice bonus. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he threw for at least 200 yards and 2 TD's, which would be great value at $5,400.
Another stack I really like is Luck/Hilton. I think this could be as good as Rodgers/Nelson if Wayne doesn't play, as Hilton should get a ton of targets. Stack would save you $1,000 and may not be as popular as Rodgers/Nelson.
I'm a Bucs fan so I watch them every week and our secondary is just pitiful right now. We look like Dallas' D last year trying to learn the cover 2. I mean twice this year, we have been down 28-0 after the 1st quarter for christs sake. Every QB we have faced has thrown for over 200 yards and has 2 TD's (with the exception of Ausitn Davis who threw for 230 yards but no TD's). If he can do that, he triples his value. I think this is a great game for Teddy to bounce back, as much as I hate to say it. There's a chance we look better coming off a bye week and the coaching fixes some of the mistakes, but I doubt it.
I was just going to say plug McKinnon it at RB for 5800 and use the extra $ for WR upgrade. The backfield isn't totally settled yet and Asiata is going to get carries, but McKinnon could take it to the house on any play. I may through a Tourney lineup out there with McKinnon and Bridgwater together.Yea, I know what you're saying. Who would you rather have at 5k? Kearse is really the only guy I see that I would consider, could be looking over some guys though. I'm having trouble finding value at WR this week, Lafell is an intriguing option, but he's probably the 4th option behind Gronk, Edelman and Vereen. Don't like too many guys in the 6,000-7,000 range either which is why I kind of want to spend for the big WR's.Bridgewater is definitely a good play in GPPs, I am just not sure about the stack. Granted, they would all be lower % players, biggest problem is that we don't know who will get the catches every week. I think you could find better value that Wright even at 5k.Yea, definitely would only be a GPP play. Was wondering about their receiving situation so thanks for chiming in as a Vikings fan. Patterson has only had 2 catches in each of the past 4 games, so it is really hard to justify playing him at $6,000. I'd rather spend less on Jennings and Wright who have been more productive. This is definitely a risky play, but when you can stack the rest of your team with Jordy Nelson, Dez Bryant, Arian Foster and Andre Ellington, I think it is worth risking especially considering the matchup.Not sure about the stack, but Bridgewater would be a good lottery play in a GPP. He has not looked very good the last couple weeks, so no one will probably be on him. Biggest problem is you don't know what receiver he is going to go to. You have Jennings who is only $500 higher and Patterson who is only $1000 higher and can break loose anywhere on the field. Not sure what Vikings team you are going to get week to week though so big ?Yea, some rushing yards would be a nice bonus. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he threw for at least 200 yards and 2 TD's, which would be great value at $5,400.
Another stack I really like is Luck/Hilton. I think this could be as good as Rodgers/Nelson if Wayne doesn't play, as Hilton should get a ton of targets. Stack would save you $1,000 and may not be as popular as Rodgers/Nelson.
I'm a Bucs fan so I watch them every week and our secondary is just pitiful right now. We look like Dallas' D last year trying to learn the cover 2. I mean twice this year, we have been down 28-0 after the 1st quarter for christs sake. Every QB we have faced has thrown for over 200 yards and has 2 TD's (with the exception of Ausitn Davis who threw for 230 yards but no TD's). If he can do that, he triples his value. I think this is a great game for Teddy to bounce back, as much as I hate to say it. There's a chance we look better coming off a bye week and the coaching fixes some of the mistakes, but I doubt it.
BTW, how do you feel about McKinnon this week? I think he's good value at $5,800.
Good catch..At both FanDuel and DraftKings, the ATL-DET game is being treated like a Thursday night game -- it is not in the Sunday contests.
Yea, I really want to have a GB stack, but I'm having trouble finding a team I like. This is my favorite one I've put together so far, but I'm still not too high on it.I might have to jump onboard the GB stack this week, if I can manage to build some high potential value plays around it. I think the odds are pretty good that Rodgers throws another 3TD's this week and the odds that Nelson will have 1 or more of those TD's pretty good as well.
Paying up a bit for D, yes.newbetterbucs07 said:Yea, I really want to have a GB stack, but I'm having trouble finding a team I like. This is my favorite one I've put together so far, but I'm still not too high on it.Aaron RodgersI might have to jump onboard the GB stack this week, if I can manage to build some high potential value plays around it. I think the odds are pretty good that Rodgers throws another 3TD's this week and the odds that Nelson will have 1 or more of those TD's pretty good as well.
Jerick McKinnon
Justin Forsett
Jordy Nelson
TY Hilton
Michael Floyd
Jordan Reed
Patrick Murray
Jags D
I never spend the minimum on Kickers and Defenses. I usually like to try and pick a matchup I'm confident, but I read the article below before making this lineup. What do you guys think? Is it worth it paying up for a better defense/kicker with a good matchup? I've paid up for defenses the past 2 weeks ($5,000+) based on match ups and they've really paid. Had Detroit and Denver 2 weeks ago who got me 21 and 15, respectively and went with the Bills last week who got me a solid 10. I usually try to spend less than $5,000 on a kicker. Used Suisham last week who was pretty cheap because I thought the Steelers would have to kick a lot of FG's and he really paid off with 14 points. I think Kickers are much harder to predict than Defenses though.
http://www.sbnation.com/2014/10/22/7027491/fanduel-save-money-where-theres-no-upside
Looks like your hoping for a 45-45 tie in New Orleans this weekFD
QBDrew Brees
NO v GB
RBJerick McKinnon
MIN @ TB
RBMark Ingram
NO v GB
WRRandall Cobb
GB @ NO
WRGolden Tate
DET @ ATL
WRJordy Nelson
GB @ NO
TEHeath Miller
PIT v IND
KMatt Prater
DET @ ATL
DCleveland Browns
CLE v OAK
Haven't played Thursday games before.. But this week is interesting..What is everyone doing with the Thurs night game and early Sun game? Even though the Det/Atl game is Sun morning, Fanduel is treating it as basically a Thurs night game. I normally fade the Thurs game or play a couple players because a lot of people are heavy on the Thurs game. Throw in the fact that it is Den/SD and Atl/Det, I think I am going to avoid the Thurs games and wait unitl Sun noon. Just feels like it is going to be way to volatile.
Thoughts?
While Im not completely avoiding the Thursday game this week, I am putting a much lower percentage of my play on the Thursday starts this week. The Thursday games I am playing I'm not fading.What is everyone doing with the Thurs night game and early Sun game? Even though the Det/Atl game is Sun morning, Fanduel is treating it as basically a Thurs night game. I normally fade the Thurs game or play a couple players because a lot of people are heavy on the Thurs game. Throw in the fact that it is Den/SD and Atl/Det, I think I am going to avoid the Thurs games and wait unitl Sun noon. Just feels like it is going to be way to volatile.
Thoughts?
Doesn't appear to be working for me. I have 4 entries this week. 1 Thur, 3 Sunday and none of them show up. The window slides into view when I click the bookmark - but it is blank.In the past, Steeler had created a bookmarklet to total up all the players on your upcoming FanDuel entries. FD made some changes to their upcoming entries page and I don't think that bookmarklet works anymore.
I created a new one to work on the new site. It's working for me but I haven't put it through a ton of test cases so no guarantees. If you guys could try it out and let me know if it's working (or not) it would be greatly appreciated.
http://o.ffense.com/fanduel/b1.php
Thanks!
I think it should work as long as you're on any FanDuel page, you don't necessarily need to be on the Upcoming Entries page. As long as you're on FD (and logged in), the bookmarklet should work.
Doesn't appear to be working for me. I have 4 entries this week. 1 Thur, 3 Sunday and none of them show up. The window slides into view when I click the bookmark - but it is blank.
FYI, I tried IE and Chrome with the same result. Chrome is running AdBlock - but it is disabled for the FanDuel site. IE is latest version with all updates.Doesn't appear to be working for me. I have 4 entries this week. 1 Thur, 3 Sunday and none of them show up. The window slides into view when I click the bookmark - but it is blank.In the past, Steeler had created a bookmarklet to total up all the players on your upcoming FanDuel entries. FD made some changes to their upcoming entries page and I don't think that bookmarklet works anymore.
I created a new one to work on the new site. It's working for me but I haven't put it through a ton of test cases so no guarantees. If you guys could try it out and let me know if it's working (or not) it would be greatly appreciated.
http://o.ffense.com/fanduel/b1.php
Thanks!
I think it should work as long as you're on any FanDuel page, you don't necessarily need to be on the Upcoming Entries page. As long as you're on FD (and logged in), the bookmarklet should work.Alright, let me take a look. Thanks for letting me know.
That works!Looks like your hoping for a 45-45 tie in New Orleans this weekFD
QBDrew Brees
NO v GB
RBJerick McKinnon
MIN @ TB
RBMark Ingram
NO v GB
WRRandall Cobb
GB @ NO
WRGolden Tate
DET @ ATL
WRJordy Nelson
GB @ NO
TEHeath Miller
PIT v IND
KMatt Prater
DET @ ATL
DCleveland Browns
CLE v OAK![]()
Yes it's working for me. That's stellar work right there.So is the new version working (or not) for anyone?
That is freaking awesome! Thanks!So is the new version working (or not) for anyone?
Working for meSo is the new version working (or not) for anyone?