My only concern there Frog was Lev Bell's hold-out. Those guys tend to get hurt. Last year he didn't, but did have 400 touches. I would not want to tempt fate again this year.I personally like pick 3. I find it difficult to pick between Gurley, Bell, and Zeke and this takes the guessing game out for me.
This is the no brainer answer. Maybe 4 if you truly trust in DJ.I personally like pick 3. I find it difficult to pick between Gurley, Bell, and Zeke and this takes the guessing game out for me.
Right now 2 the best. You don't have to worry about Bell if you don't want to....or you can take him. I have DJ 4, but DJ has a few more concerns than the other 3. Get Gurley or Zeke and be happy.After winning the "loser's pool" in my league last year (I know, that's like being the skinniest kid in fat camp), I had my choice of whatever draft slot I wanted (1 through 12). But I had to make that choice at the end of May. At that time, I decided to go with pick # 1, so that I can get whoever I want--and not have to worry about hold-outs, preseason injuries, etc. If I had to do it today, I probably would take # 2 (primarily because I want to take Zeke, and I know Gurley would go # 1 otherwise).
Just gimme something in the top 4 or as close to the elbow as possible. I'm reaching for McCaffrey if I don't get a top 4 back, so I want to have a pick in that 13-15 range to feel comfortable enough to wait until round 2 and pick someone else round 1 - maximize value. Picks 5-9 are no man's land. He'd be a major reach there, but I also lack assurances he will fall.
The dream sequence is pick 4, take DJ, then McCaffrey falls to 21.
I was going to say 5 as want Barkley and than Green on the way back but 6 will be perfect if everyone feels those are the top 5. Going by polls it seems that way. So give me 6.Pick #5 for me-
Zeke, Gurley, Bell, AB, & DJ, in that order for me, are a cut above the next group in PPR.
For standard- pick #4- as I am assured a top 4 RB.
Would depend on how closely you have picks 1-2 or 1-2-3 etc rated. If you had 1-2-3 rated closely the answer would then be 3.Mathematically, isn't the answer always 1? I guess you can say some other position because you might get a better second round pick, but if assigned a value to every pick (the higher the pick, the higher the value), the math always works out for #1.
If you like 2 or 3 guys equally in the first, then sure, you might prefer the third pick to get that better player in the second round, but how does that look after 3 rounds, 5 rounds, or later?
Same. Big fan of the turn.In order: 1, 2, 12, 11, 3, 4, 10, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
I like to be at the turn. You get one player that is falling because people over think things and the other one you don’t feel bad about reaching because you know he won’t last 2 more rounds.
The other thing is that it I feel like I can spark runs on players. Or with that second pick when people see you going outside of typical ADP with your second pick, they will start reaching for their guys because they’re spooked that you’ll jump ADP and take them.
I think the turn is highly overrated. Your comment about starting a run by going outside ADP can be done at any spot.In order: 1, 2, 12, 11, 3, 4, 10, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
I like to be at the turn. You get one player that is falling because people over think things and the other one you don’t feel bad about reaching because you know he won’t last 2 more rounds.
The other thing is that it I feel like I can spark runs on players. Or with that second pick when people see you going outside of typical ADP with your second pick, they will start reaching for their guys because they’re spooked that you’ll jump ADP and take them.
It can but in the middle parts of the draft I’m not as willing to reach for a guy. And when I do it’s not usually as much of a reach or as noticeable. That’s partially why I said the part before.I think the turn is highly overrated. Your comment about starting a run by going outside ADP can be done at any spot.
Just for debate, wouldn't you be more likely to take a reach at 2.06? You pick again in 12 spots. If you reach at 2.02, you don't pick for 24 spots again.It can but in the middle parts of the draft I’m not as willing to reach for a guy. And when I do it’s not usually as much of a reach or as noticeable. That’s partially why I said the part before.
You're more likely to gamble your actual target will still be there with your next pick the sooner you get to pick again.Just for debate, wouldn't you be more likely to take a reach at 2.06? You pick again in 12 spots. If you reach at 2.02, you don't pick for 24 spots again.
Unless, you are not talking about reaching in round 2.
In round 2 I’m not reaching. There’s too much that good stuff. You get a combination of Fournette, Cook, Hunt, Julio. That’s a fantastic start to a draft.Just for debate, wouldn't you be more likely to take a reach at 2.06? You pick again in 12 spots. If you reach at 2.02, you don't pick for 24 spots again.
Unless, you are not talking about reaching in round 2.
I agree. Plus you get the extra benefit of getting a WR like AJ, Evan's or, if you're lucky, maybe Michael Thomas in the second.Pick #5 for me-
Zeke, Gurley, Bell, AB, & DJ, in that order for me, are a cut above the next group in PPR.
For standard- pick #4- as I am assured a top 4 RB.
mckinnin going well before 3.o3... rodgers 2nd too early as is watson. gordon going sooner as is freemanBack to my earlier thought - I am trying to think 3 players deep not just 2. The uncertainty usually ramps up in round 3 so I am trying to get 3 bank.players.
Copying a random PPR top 36, here is the 3 players you would get if the draft went chalk (chalk being the top 36 from this site)
1 Gurley Gronk Kelce
2 Zeke Freeman T Hill
3 Bell Rodgers Mckinnon
4 DJ Mixon J Howard
5 A Brown AJ Green Diggs
6 Barkley Mccaffrey D Watson
7 Hopkins Evans A Cooper
8 Kamara D Adams Guice
9 Beckham K Allen Ertz
10 K Hunt J Jones Baldwin
11 Fournette D Cook Thielen
12 M Thomas Gordon R Wilson
So don't get hung up on the players names - that's not important The key is for these purposes these are your top 36. The key is what looks like the best trio in your rankings.
Right now, I get nervous at A Cooper at 3.7 - so I want to pick top 6 probably top 4.
Dont think that's the point of his post.mckinnin going well before 3.o3... rodgers 2nd too early as is watson. gordon going sooner as is freeman
Why would you use a random list? Fantasy Pros Combined Rankings Use the average of a bunch of different places. Or use the PPR ADP at a place like Draft Calculator. Coopers average rank is 37 and his ADP is 3.12.Back to my earlier thought - I am trying to think 3 players deep not just 2. The uncertainty usually ramps up in round 3 so I am trying to get 3 bank.players.
Copying a random PPR top 36, here is the 3 players you would get if the draft went chalk (chalk being the top 36 from this site)
1 Gurley Gronk Kelce
2 Zeke Freeman T Hill
3 Bell Rodgers Mckinnon
4 DJ Mixon J Howard
5 A Brown AJ Green Diggs
6 Barkley Mccaffrey D Watson
7 Hopkins Evans A Cooper
8 Kamara D Adams Guice
9 Beckham K Allen Ertz
10 K Hunt J Jones Baldwin
11 Fournette D Cook Thielen
12 M Thomas Gordon R Wilson
So don't get hung up on the players names - that's not important The key is for these purposes these are your top 36. The key is what looks like the best trio in your rankings.
Right now, I get nervous at A Cooper at 3.7 - so I want to pick top 6 probably top 4.
No offense but I don't think your point is logical. Why choose 12 and hope 1-2 guys fall 6 spots? What if they don't? I end up in a considerable hole that I have to rebound from and the risk grows exponentially with each round..Why would you use a random list? Fantasy Pros Combined Rankings Use the average of a bunch of different places. Or use the PPR ADP at a place like Draft Calculator. Coopers average rank is 37 and his ADP is 3.12.
If you are using Cooper as your cut off it seems that 12 would be the better spot. Especially, if even 1 or 2 guys can slip. Then you’d end up with 4 of your top guys.
I have the three spot in both my money leagues and I have not been in love with any of my mocks. I just don’t love the guys available at the 2-3 turn and feel like I’m either reaching or settling.I just had the 2nd choice for draft pick in a 12 team, redraft PPR.
I landed on the 3rd pick. (My 2 cents of) logic is:
1. Things look like they drop off quickly in the 3rd round so I want to be higher there.
2. Getting a top RB puts you at a competitive advantage and I see 4 guys there
3. Taking the 3rd pick balances getting that top RB, and protecting yourself from a devastating injury to one of those top 4 guys, and getting higher in the 3rd without dropping all the way to the bottom of the 2rd.
I love 3 or 4. Guarantee one of the top 4 RBs.I have the three spot in both my money leagues and I have not been in love with any of my mocks. I just don’t love the guys available at the 2-3 turn and feel like I’m either reaching or settling.
Haven’t seen Allen, Thomas, Adams, CMC, Cook or Gronk make it back to 2.10 in any of my mocks. But who knows what happens come draft day with real league mates.I love 3 or 4. Guarantee one of the top 4 RBs.
Lots to like at the 2/3 turn. Could see one of K. Allen/M. Thomas, or D. Adams slip. Could also see CMC/Cook other solid RBs slip as your #2 RB.
Gronk's ADP has him squarely as an option late round 2.
Early round 3, I'm eyeballing TY Hilton or Diggs. Maybe even Mixon.
Funny... I was getting ready to post that I grabbed Allen or CMC at 2.10 but they both went right before me.Haven’t seen Allen, Thomas, Adams, CMC, Cook or Gronk make it back to 2.10 in any of my mocks. But who knows what happens come draft day with real league mates.
Im always stuck looking at Jordan Howard, Mike Evans at that turn. Evans could be solid but sort of burned me last year, so maybe it’s just a personal agenda.
Do they not do official “X Round Draft” threads around these parts anymore? I usually disappear over the summer... but always enjoy them as you get some strategy and discussion on a specific pick, and I’ve got the 3 spot in both leagues.Funny... I was getting ready to post that I grabbed Allen or CMC at 2.10 but they both went right before me.
Looking at the likes of Green, Hill, Evans, Freeman or Kelce at 2.10 now...