What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FBG advice failed me (1 Viewer)

kftobin

Footballguy
Against my better instinct I went with Cinci DEF as they were projected high by FBG. I left Giants and Bears on the pine. Anyone else have a playoff match screwed by this error?

 
Against my better instinct I went with Cinci DEF as they were projected high by FBG. I left Giants and Bears on the pine. Anyone else have a playoff match screwed by this error?
Screwed by this error? Seriously?FBG didn't post your roster or draft your team. They gave you advice, which is what you paid for. You expect the projections and cheatsheets to be 100% accurate each week? Surely not. They are intended to be a guide, but you make the final call. If you made a bad one, blame yourself.
 
How did FBG screw you? The others have not even played yet. Cincy still has plenty of game to go. This is still the 9ers they are playing. Yeesh, relax.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where do you see the Bengals projected higher than the NYG?? I have the same two and went with the NYG based on FBG projections and the fact that the Bengals suck

 
Not only are you entitled to a refund, but you have a nice case there for a lawsuit. I see millions in damages. How could they possibly mislead you like this?

 
Does your TV not work at all? No newspapers in your town? 13 weeks of horrible defense usually leads to a 14th week of the same....I give you the Bengals!!

 
Wow, this still happens? FBGs stopped screwing me 16 years ago, WHEN I FIRST SUBMITTED >>>>>MY<<<<< LINEUP.

(sorry could not resist)

As, FBGs stopped screwing me 16 years ago. :D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I demand a refund from FBG's because they projected Chad Johnson to be a usable WR and he is clearly worthless and costing me several playoffs tonight!

 
If FPGs' advice was right every week, they wouldn't have to charge you for it because they wouldn't have this website because they would be millionaires

The advice you get from here is the same advice you get from one of those game predictors- sites that tell you if you should or should not bet on a game, the spread, etc... If sites like that and this one were 100% right all the time, they wouldn't need the website, they coudl just play their own picks and make millions.

You, sir, are a moron...

look at their preseason top 10 Qbs, RBs, WRs... tell me how many are perfect with what the top 10s are in your league... honestly, 50% accuracy would be unbelievable...

 
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?

 
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?
Does your mom wipe your ### still after a dump too? Stop trying to blame FBG because you chose to follow their advice. You started the Bengals, deal with it. :lmao:14 weeks in, I probably wouldn't want to rely on the Bengals defense. :D And that's taking into consideration how awful the 49er offense looked under Dilfer&Smith.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?
Does your mom wipe your ### still after a dump too?Stop trying to blame FBG because you chose to follow their advice. You started the Bengals, deal with it. :ptts:14 weeks in, I probably wouldn't want to rely on the Bengals defense. :shrug: And that's taking into consideration how awful the 49er offense looked under Dilfer&Smith.
FYI I did not start the Bengals on any team. Just pointing out that everyone is saying how the KNEW the Bengals were going to suck and they were ranked 5th by FBG. In case you were wondering I started the Vikings.
 
Yep, you're screwed. A guy in my league is playing them too and we count points against. 17 points midway through the 3rd Q is not good. I expect at least 10 more points by SF tonight. You had better hope for a ST TD because the DEF is getting gutted.

 
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?
Does your mom wipe your ### still after a dump too?Stop trying to blame FBG because you chose to follow their advice. You started the Bengals, deal with it. :ptts:14 weeks in, I probably wouldn't want to rely on the Bengals defense. :shrug: And that's taking into consideration how awful the 49er offense looked under Dilfer&Smith.
FYI I did not start the Bengals on any team. Just pointing out that everyone is saying how the KNEW the Bengals were going to suck and they were ranked 5th by FBG. In case you were wondering I started the Vikings.
Sorry I thought you were the OP. I am wondering. Who else did you start?
 
Defensive projections are very tricky b/c there are so many different scoring systems. In a system that emphasizes big plays like INTS, the Bengals vs. a rookie 3rd stringer is a totally reasonable play that hasn't panned out. In systems where you get hurt by points allowed, you should know better than touching them with a 1000 foot pole. Instead of :shrug: how about doing something constructive like suggesting they broaden their defensive projections for next year and the custom rankings accordingly, hire Miss Cleo, and get a fresh supply of voodoo dolls.

FBG is a great tool, but if you just use it as a quick cheat-sheet maker and don't do your own analysis, you can :ptts: but make sure are wearing it first so the blame can be more accurately applied.

-QG

 
I bet they ranked Palmer ahead of Hill tonight as well. What were they thinking? Darrell Jackson looks like a lock for the Pro Bowl.

 
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?
Does your mom wipe your ### still after a dump too?Stop trying to blame FBG because you chose to follow their advice. You started the Bengals, deal with it. :ptts:14 weeks in, I probably wouldn't want to rely on the Bengals defense. :ptts: And that's taking into consideration how awful the 49er offense looked under Dilfer&Smith.
FYI I did not start the Bengals on any team. Just pointing out that everyone is saying how the KNEW the Bengals were going to suck and they were ranked 5th by FBG. In case you were wondering I started the Vikings.
Sorry I thought you were the OP. I am wondering. Who else did you start?
No problem.....not defending him but its easy to pile it on. If he would have started a thread about how HE liked the match-up, first start at QB, lowest scoring team, etc. I'm sure we would have some sympathy for him :shrug:
 
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?
Does your mom wipe your ### still after a dump too?Stop trying to blame FBG because you chose to follow their advice. You started the Bengals, deal with it. :ptts:14 weeks in, I probably wouldn't want to rely on the Bengals defense. :ptts: And that's taking into consideration how awful the 49er offense looked under Dilfer&Smith.
FYI I did not start the Bengals on any team. Just pointing out that everyone is saying how the KNEW the Bengals were going to suck and they were ranked 5th by FBG. In case you were wondering I started the Vikings.
Sorry I thought you were the OP. I am wondering. Who else did you start?
No problem.....not defending him but its easy to pile it on. If he would have started a thread about how HE liked the match-up, first start at QB, lowest scoring team, etc. I'm sure we would have some sympathy for him :shrug:
:lol:More than likely he would of gotten responses full of :ptts:
 
You obviously chose the cheap subscription.

Next time do what I did, pony up an extra $30 and get the guaranteed subscription that is always 100% correct. Takes a bit of the fun out of trying to manage your team, but I am 14-0 in 19 different leagues. It's worth the extra money.

 
I certainly agree with the crowd but if EVERYONE here new the Bengals were so awful on defense how come FBG's did not?
Because they were playing the Niners who suck as well. It's a guideline. If you instinct tells you to play someone, play them. But blaming FBG because a 3rd string QB was able to rally his loser team to a win makes you a worse coach/manager than either of the coaches tonight.These threads always crack me up, people can't take responsibility for their own actions. They want someone to win their games for them but whine when projections aren't dead on. :moneybag: :cry: X 1000
 
Any decent owner takes projections with a grain of salt. I sat Housh tonight even though he was rated higher than my other options (A. Gates and S. McDonald).

Sometimes you just have to go w/ your gut.

 
They had them ranked so high because the niners have the worst ranked offense in the league. Going with a new qb. But even the worst ranked offense can put up poiints on the bungles. I probably wouldn't have started Cinn over the bears or NYG. Bad weather is good for defenses. Sometimes you've got to come up with your own rankings. If you depend on FBG rankings all year, you're going to be disappointed alot.

I can only hope they are wrong about Mcgahee and grant as well, since they have them both ranked ahead of my 2 guys Gore and AP. Please be wrong, pleeeezzzzzz!

LOL

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top