What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FBG conflict of interest (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Uncle Buck

Footballguy
I hate the fact that FBG staff(site owner in this case) is using fanduel (http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=670995 )while giving player rankings every week.

FBG site: hey suckers, use fanduel

FBG member: okay, checks fbg player rankings

FBG site: player x is going to have 50 yards player y is going to have 70 yards

FBG member: uses fanduel and starts player y against FBG staff that uses player x

player y has 20 yards player x has 123 yards. FBG site wins over FBG member

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=667430&st=50 if you go here, you'll see how often FBGs is wrong and at first I thought it was because they were just bad but maybe now it could be because they want to make extra money off of us on fanduel

thoughts?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would be more concerned, but it is pretty transparent. He isn't hiding playing. He provides fanduel specific buys/plays. Do you have any examples of his saying "this guys is awesome, play him, but don't play this guy" and then doing the opposite? Or is this all hypothetical?

Also, fanduel is a separate entity that has a larger support base than just fbg members. I get where you are coming from, but I have a hard time getting to your conclusion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If his rankings are consistently bad then he loses his business just to make a few extra bucks gambling. I doubt he's that dumb.

 
something to keep in mind, this site ran fear and loathing out of town because they didnt like the fact he was giving away free content. this site is pretty damn greedy

 
According to Dodds' own admission, FBGs is worth $4 million. To have him start a thread about winning $2000 would be like me starting a thread about finding a dime on the ground.

It does smack a bit of shameless self-promotion, and an attempt to further solidify the relationship with Fanduel.

 
Then why do you still go by their rankings if they are so bad? I've been winning more than losing on FanDuel and in all fantasy football using these rankings as a guideline. I just don't understand? Couldn't every rankings site be botching their rankings to win on FanDuel or other sites based on your logic?

 
Then why do you still go by their rankings if they are so bad? I've been winning more than losing on FanDuel and in all fantasy football using these rankings as a guideline. I just don't understand? Couldn't every rankings site be botching their rankings to win on FanDuel or other sites based on your logic?
there are no other sites, footballguys is by far the most popular site for fantasy football. other sites need to get that blindless following first then they can botch their rankings
 
I'm still mad at Dodds for that time he sucked out on me in a heads up poker game online. Effin' Dodds.

 
Interesting to say the least...

I posted that I had been winning in FanDuel, because my weekly column has been very right the last two weeks. And people following it should have also likely won their bets. I don't see it as a conflict of interest, but will refrain from talking about it anymore (and just post my weekly column) to the site as I had been doing.

As for Buck Stop and his constant this site sucks comments, I am done with those. You obviously hate the site, think we are horrible at what we do so it's time for you to move on. There appears to be some ax you are looking to grind and I am done watching it play out on our message boards. You are effectively banned from our boards going forward.

As for me tanking my projections, this independent analysis seems to completely refute what you are saying: http://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/accuracy/

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top