FBG Rankings Question (1 Viewer)

[Bizkiteer]

Why would a staff member submit a dynasty ranking, but not include ANY of the rookies that were just taken in the NFL Draft? If you go to the QB's, a staff member doesn't even rank Leinart, V. Young or Cutler, they did rank rookies RB's. This makes absolutely no sense what so ever to me and is not very good.

By not ranking them at all, it alters the perceived value of players in those dyansty rankings. Thus, some players appear higher or lower and basically distorts what you're trying to provide.

Not trying to call anyone out, but I guess in a way I am. What I'm really trying to get at is that I would think that someone would be the QA for the rankings. This would make sure that any submitted ranking is not totally off base. Ina sense making sure that Marshall Faulk is not the highest RB ranked still.

Drinking and ranking doesn't mix.

 

[Bizkiteer]

33 views and counting and not a word...wait was that a pin I just heard drop? Maybe everyone is scratching their heads too.

 

[Ron_Mexico]

 

[BroadwayG]

33 views and counting and not a word...wait was that a pin I just heard drop? Maybe everyone is scratching their heads too.

Nope, scratching my junk. And Jiminy Crickets, it's May for crying out loud.

 

[Bizkiteer]

33 views and counting and not a word...wait was that a pin I just heard drop?  Maybe everyone is scratching their heads too.

Nope, scratching my junk. And Jiminy Crickets, it's May for crying out loud.

I would say that if you have a ranking out, you should do it to the best of your ability. Yes, rankings are not taken as serious at this time, but they are DYNASTY rankings. Those are basically year around. Basically, the ranking is saying that basically the guy is saying that Matt Cassel, Seneca Wallace are better dynasty QB's. If you are going to do it, do it right. I'm not going to argue if he likes Leinart better or Young, but to not include them...crazy.

 

[Couch Potato]

33 views and counting and not a word...wait was that a pin I just heard drop? Maybe everyone is scratching their heads too.

Nope, scratching my junk. And Jiminy Crickets, it's May for crying out loud.

I would say that if you have a ranking out, you should do it to the best of your ability. Yes, rankings are not taken as serious at this time, but they are DYNASTY rankings. Those are basically year around. Basically, the ranking is saying that basically the guy is saying that Matt Cassel, Seneca Wallace are better dynasty QB's. If you are going to do it, do it right. I'm not going to argue if he likes Leinart better or Young, but to not include them...crazy.

I actually PM'd the staff member yesterday about this. He hasn't replied, but I'm sure it's just an oversight and he'll get it fixed soon.

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

much better to send the person a PM or email than to start a thread on the message board.

I sent him a PM. I'm sure he'll reply when he checks in.

 

[Will Grant]

Thanks aaron..

Not sure what happened..... I opened up the rankings and there were QBS...

I resubmitted it and there they were..

Sorry it took so long.. work has been brutal and I don't get to see the boards as much as I'd like..