The General said:I would vote for many people listed. Will very likely be the Dem.
I wanted to see who everyone's 1st choice would be rather than dilute the results with secondary choices. Look at the popularity of Yang and Buttigieg. Could either secure the Democratic nomination?ignatiusjreilly said:Last question should have been “Check all that apply”. I put Biden because I figured I’ll end up voting for the Democrat, and he’s the one most likely to be the nominee. In fact, other than Harris, I think it is exceedingly unlikely that any of the other Dems listed here will be the nominee. But in truth I have no idea who will run or what the situation will be by 2024.
True, she probably should have been included. But as a relatively conservative white female Democrat, what are her chances?dozer said:
No. I think after his collapse in NYC Yang's political career is over. As for Pete, I still don't see it. He ran a good campaign last year and raised his profile, but I'd much rather see him go back and run for governor of Indiana. It would still be a tough haul, but is way more realistic than him getting the Dem nomination.I wanted to see who everyone's 1st choice would be rather than dilute the results with secondary choices. Look at the popularity of Yang and Buttigieg. Could either secure the Democratic nomination?
I think Pete would be a great candidate if he weren't gay. I would gladly vote for him but I just don't think enough Americans would be able to get by that.No. I think after his collapse in NYC Yang's political career is over. As for Pete, I still don't see it. He ran a good campaign last year and raised his profile, but I'd much rather see him go back and run for governor of Indiana. It would still be a tough haul, but is way more realistic than him getting the Dem nomination.
Same. Plus God knows what happens between now and then.I voted "conservative," "none," and "none of these" but really I would vote for a few names on that list and they don't all come from the same party. I just didn't feel like choosing one in particular.
ouch. That's got to hurt to type that.Conservative
Democrat (until the Trump Q parts of the GOP disappear into the black hole of history they deserve to go into).
Mayor Pete. Would have clicked on a few of them if that was an option, but none of the GOP, see above.
Sure...maybe he should. However...I think he would make a great POTUS based on temperament, intelligence, ideas.Lol @ Yang. He got smoked trying to be Mayor of New York. Maybe he should win a city council seat first?
Really don`t think being gay matters. Pete is much more electable than Harris. Question is will he run against Harris in 24?I think Pete would be a great candidate if he weren't gay. I would gladly vote for him but I just don't think enough Americans would be able to get by that.
I am not a fan of Harris and think she is nearly as unlikable as Hillary which spells trouble for the Democrats if Biden doesn't run for reelection. If the Republican party wasn't so bat-crazy I could see me voting GOP or third party for president in 2024 but the candidate they nominate will be Trump or a Trump wanna-be.
Sure...maybe he should. However...I think he would make a great POTUS based on temperament, intelligence, ideas.
So why is it so funny?
Lol at Ted Cruz
I would vote for Kasich if he ran but unfortunately level-headed conservatives that don't believe the election lies dont have a chance.Should have had Kasich/Klobuchar as options as they seem to be the most moderate for each party.
So no answer? Just a whatabout this other post?Why is this so funny?
I already pointed out he has zero experience and can’t get traction for NYC Mayor. I find it telling how you jumped on my Lol and not a poster on the other/your side. This is exactly the type of thing Joe asked you not to do in another thread. I refuse to take the bait so you can get me a TO during draft season. Good Day!So no answer? Just a whatabout this other post?
I can list a bunch of ways Ted Cruz would be an awful POTUS. There is a whole Ted Cruz thread. And Im not AAABatteries…so you would have to ask him. Im asking the person who made the comment about Yang.
Never has and never will, always the same and best to avoid.I already pointed out he has zero experience and can’t get traction for NYC Mayor. I find it telling how you jumped on my Lol and not a poster on the other/your side. This is exactly the type of thing Joe asked you not to do in another thread. I refuse to take the bait so you can get me a TO during draft season. Good Day!
In fairness though what may do well for mayor of NY probably wouldn’t be popular in our country as a whole….actually the opposite.Lol @ Yang. He got smoked trying to be Mayor of New York. Maybe he should win a city council seat first?
I already pointed out he has zero experience and can’t get traction for NYC Mayor. I find it telling how you jumped on my Lol and not a poster on the other/your side. This is exactly the type of thing Joe asked you not to do in another thread. I refuse to take the bait so you can get me a TO during draft season. Good Day!
I would vote for Kasich if he ran but unfortunately level-headed conservatives that don't believe the election lies dont have a chance.
I will include them next time and drop Pence and Obama. Who else should be included?Should have had Kasich/Klobuchar as options as they seem to be the most moderate for each party.
Ted Cruz is 50. Yang is 46. Yang has never held office and Cruz has won multiple terms to the US Senate. Sometimes it’s better to not have to get in the last word.Umm...I believe Joe's post in that other thread was to both of us. Not just me.
And what I questioned (no jumping on) was a laugh at the guy I specifically said I would support...so I wondered why. It had zero to do with someone else's post about Ted Cruz. I think there are major differences in age and experience here that would lead someone to write off Cruz at the moment...but think Yang isn't done in politics or chances for office including POTUS.
In today's political climate...I don't think Cruz's years of office are a plus to him. Nor do I think experience will be a factor any longer thanks to Trump...right?Ted Cruz is 50. Yang is 46. Yang has never held office and Cruz has won multiple terms to the US Senate. Sometimes it’s better to not have to get in the last word.
He had the nomination in the bag until he figuratively stuck his foot in his mouth with his tweet about the Israeli-Palestinian conflictLol @ Yang. He got smoked trying to be Mayor of New York. Maybe he should win a city council seat first?
I kind of agonized over that choice too. One one hand, I'm kind of reluctant to share a political label with Trump supporters. On the other hand, I was a conservative long before those people came along, and as we all learned from Office Space, why should I have to change my name when he's the one who sucks?I voted independent instead of conservative. Considering my break with the American right and intellectual right is so thorough, i felt bad calling myself that which no longer even comes close to representing me. When the intellectual leaders seriously discuss monarchy and secession and anti-democratic policies as tenable or desirable, count me out. As Walter Berns told First Things once, “Take my name off of your masthead.”
I get that, but in my mind conservative thought has changed and the cognoscenti have taken a dangerous tack that I want no part of, even by mistaken association. Best to assert it in demonstrative and meaningful fashion. Independent it is, though that may be a misnomer as most independents are a mish-mash of ideas that are incoherent. I’d like to think I’m a consistent classical liberal that believes in the art and science of politics, just like in the Enlightenment.I kind of agonized over that choice too. One one hand, I'm kind of reluctant to share a political label with Trump supporters. On the other hand, I was a conservative long before those people came along, and as we all learned from Office Space, why should I have to change my name when he's the one who sucks?
Some people have questioned the difference between moderate and independent. Everyone's answer likely differs but I thought independent may be more of a mish-mash of ideas whereas moderate is more in the middle on most issues. One example of an extreme view is that I feel our country could benefit from well organized work camps. Our prison system should certainly be break even or even profitable. But the work camps would be for those who are without work and looking for assistance. I envision them as being like the military, but actually productive and efficient.I get that, but in my mind conservative thought has changed and the cognoscenti have taken a dangerous tack that I want no part of, even by mistaken association. Best to assert it in demonstrative and meaningful fashion. Independent it is, though that may be a misnomer as most independents are a mish-mash of ideas that are incoherent. I’d like to think I’m a consistent classical liberal that believes in the art and science of politics, just like in the Enlightenment.
I agree with you about the terms "moderate" and "independent." That strikes me as a good explanation -- as good as one might offer.Some people have questioned the difference between moderate and independent. Everyone's answer likely differs but I thought independent may be more of a mish-mash of ideas whereas moderate is more in the middle on most issues. One example of an extreme view is that I feel our country could benefit from well organized work camps. Our prison system should certainly be break even or even profitable. But the work camps would be for those who are without work and looking for assistance. I envision them as being like the military, but actually productive and efficient.
True. I don't believe there should be a private, for-profit prison system, and I don't want to provide incentive for locking people up unnecessarily. But the fact that it costs around 50K a year to imprison mostly able bodied people reflects poorly on our current system.I agree with you about the terms "moderate" and "independent." That strikes me as a good explanation -- as good as one might offer.
Your policy proposal strikes me as compulsive and authoritarian, though. You might find a home for that in authoritarian conservative circles, actually. I also would disagree with it. There are too many criminal laws right now. No need to provide incentive for the government to enforce them, and in the name of the public good throw people in the clink, in my estimation.
That's what we are trying to determine here.True, she probably should have been included. But as a relatively conservative white female Democrat, what are her chances?
A flock of pigs just went past my penthouse window.ouch. That's got to hurt to type thatConservative
Democrat (until the Trump Q parts of the GOP disappear into the black hole of history they deserve to go into).
Mayor Pete. Would have clicked on a few of them if that was an option, but none of the GOP, see above.
Not that I disagree, though I do like Yang.Lol @ Yang. He got smoked trying to be Mayor of New York. Maybe he should win a city council seat first?