Dam.. thats a lot of Reps..Westbrook = powerhttp://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/profile.php?pyid=60144
Name: Brian Westbrook
Rated number 7 out of 49 RB's / 539 TOTAL
Combine Invite: Yes
Height: 5'08.3
Weight: 200
40 Yrd Dash: 4.57
20 Yrd Dash: 2.65
10 Yrd Dash: 1.58
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 26
Vertical Jump: 37
Broad Jump: 09'10"
20 Yrd Shuttle:
3-Cone Drill: 7.09
I don't disagree with your point about Westbrook being more powerful than Felix, but bench press has almost nothing to do with running strength.
And I highlighted the similars.. no 2 players are going to be the same... especially in a series of tests.I'm just saying.. K Faulk's usage in NE is a great example of how I picture Jones being used in Dal.KellysHeroes said:K Faulk: Rated number 3 out of 35 RB's
Combine Invite: yes
Height: 5075
Weight: 205
40 Yrd Dash: 4.57
20 Yrd Dash: 2.62
10 Yrd Dash: 1.61
225 Lb. Bench Reps:
Vertical Jump: 34
Broad Jump: 09'06"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.09
3-Cone Drill: 7.14
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/profile.php?pyid=60981
Felix Jones: Rated number 5 out of 187 RB's
Combine Invite: Yes
Height: 5101
Weight: 207
40 Yrd Dash: 4.44 / 40 High: 4.53
20 Yrd Dash: 2.59
10 Yrd Dash: 1.46
225 Lb. Bench Reps:
Vertical Jump: 33 1/2
Broad Jump: 10'04"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.19
3-Cone Drill: 6.90
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/profile.php?pyid=56490
Theres more than Running speed to be an NFL RB... Chest Strengh helps w/ Breaking Tackles and Holding onto the Ball. 2 Things that Westy does very very well.I don't disagree with your point about Westbrook being more powerful than Felix, but bench press has almost nothing to do with running strength.Second time that's been pointed out in this thread.
Not actually... in many sources he was ranked 5th.And if you really believe none of this year's RBs would be drafted higher than Faulk was that year, it's not worth talking about this anymore.FWIW, KFaulk was 3rd behind Edge and Ricky Williams. No back drafted this year would have been higher.
I think he is saying no RB would be drafted higher than #3 which would put them ahead of Faulk.Not actually... in many sources he was ranked 5th.And if you really believe none of this year's RBs would be drafted higher than Faulk was that year, it's not worth talking about this anymore.FWIW, KFaulk was 3rd behind Edge and Ricky Williams. No back drafted this year would have been higher.
Actually, any RB drafted #3 would put them ahead of Faulk, as if all these RBs were in the same class as Edge and Ricky, and Faulk, I could easily see a few taken before Edge (McFadden and Stewart) and about 5 more taken before Faulk.To say that none of these would be drafted higher than #3 in that class makes them equal to Faulk since he was drafted #3 is incorrect. Even if we agreed that none of these guys would be drafted ahead of Edge or Ricky, that doesn't say anything about them in comparison to Faulk.I think he is saying no RB would be drafted higher than #3 which would put them ahead of Faulk.Not actually... in many sources he was ranked 5th.And if you really believe none of this year's RBs would be drafted higher than Faulk was that year, it's not worth talking about this anymore.FWIW, KFaulk was 3rd behind Edge and Ricky Williams. No back drafted this year would have been higher.
Actually, any RB drafted #3 would put them ahead of Faulk, as if all these RBs were in the same class as Edge and Ricky, and Faulk, I could easily see a few taken before Edge (McFadden and Stewart) and about 5 more taken before Faulk.To say that none of these would be drafted higher than #3 in that class makes them equal to Faulk since he was drafted #3 is incorrect. Even if we agreed that none of these guys would be drafted ahead of Edge or Ricky, that doesn't say anything about them in comparison to Faulk.I think he is saying no RB would be drafted higher than #3 which would put them ahead of Faulk.Not actually... in many sources he was ranked 5th.And if you really believe none of this year's RBs would be drafted higher than Faulk was that year, it's not worth talking about this anymore.FWIW, KFaulk was 3rd behind Edge and Ricky Williams. No back drafted this year would have been higher.
Actually, I'm not all that high on Stewart, if you read any of my posts. But realistically, it would not have been shocking if he or McFadden went before Edge. They would have been in the same tier, below Ricky.Then Mendenhall.Then Johnson, Jones.Then Smith, Forte.Then Charles and Faulk.After a player has been in the pros, we judge them by their pro career, we often forget how they were perceived coming into the league.You're clearly buying into the hype if you think Stew would go before Edge. Maybe McFadden, but I doubt it. All I said was they wouldn't have ranked any higher, in comparison to the RBs, than he did.Bottom line here, I see Jones as closer to KFaulk than Westbrook or Bush. You disagree, so be it. Time will tell.
At least we agree on one thing.In all reality, where they would have been drafted is pretty meaningless when it comes to how they will do, or have done, in the NFL. For RBs, a lot has to do with the team they're on, after the truly elite anyway. (I don't think you're even saying Jones is elite.)Actually, I'm not all that high on Stewart, if you read any of my posts. But realistically, it would not have been shocking if he or McFadden went before Edge. They would have been in the same tier, below Ricky.Then Mendenhall.You're clearly buying into the hype if you think Stew would go before Edge. Maybe McFadden, but I doubt it.
All I said was they wouldn't have ranked any higher, in comparison to the RBs, than he did.
Bottom line here, I see Jones as closer to KFaulk than Westbrook or Bush. You disagree, so be it. Time will tell.
Then Johnson, Jones.
Then Smith, Forte.
Then Charles and Faulk.
After a player has been in the pros, we judge them by their pro career, we often forget how they were perceived coming into the league.
Yes Edge was the first taken, but not the consensus #1 back in the draft (until after the fact). My contention was that if we took the 99 and 08 classes of RBs and put them all together, it wouldn't necessarily fall out the same way. DMac, Stewart, Ricky, Edge all would have been viewed as the top backs in the class. It may still have gone Edge Ricky DMac Stewart, but maybe not. Their estimated talent level entering the NFL is estimated very closely.As for Faulk, he is clearly not among the top-7 to 8 backs drafted this year.When u Guys are saying that Any of the big 3 would be taken before Edge.. then your saying that they would be the 1st off the board, right.Wasn't Ricky passed up by the Colts and they selected James... even though Ricky was rated higher.DMac may of been drafted in the same area has Edge and Ricky, w/ in the top 10 picks... but no way Stewart and Mendenhall would.
Barber averaged 4.8YPC last season, with far less speed than Jones has. I think your YPC for both is far below what it will be.I also can't see Barber getting 300 carries. Most Julius had was 260, I think that's a realistic expectation for Barber. This is still a passing offense.If I were to project right now, off the cuff:Barber 270 carries, 4.5 YPC, 1215 yards, 23 rec, 160 yards, 12 TDsJones 145 carries, 5.1 YPC, 786 yards, 42 rec, 412 yards, 7 TDsGetting back to the subject...JJ avg 11.75 touches a game last yr / MBIII avg 15.5Dallas was 21th in the league w/ 419 attempts... I would say that # increases this yr as well... 450 would be the ceiling (that would put them in the top 10 of attempts, so that # maybe high).MBIII load should increase now that their paying him 47M and hes the starter... I would venture that they limit him too 300 carries which equals 18.75 carries a game. Toss in 20 or so Recs and that gives u 20 Touchs a week for Barber.Give Felix 150 Carries w/ 40 recs and u get about 12 touches a game.So thats my analysis of the situation.MBIII w/ 300 Carries @ a 4.2 YPC = 1260 yds plus 20 Recs for 140 yds. Double Digit TDsJones w/ 150 Carries @ a 4.5 YPC = 675 yds plus 40 Recs for 320.. 3 TDsI believe thats the Ceiling for Jones unless Barber gets injuried at some pt.
I can live w/ ur Barber Projection... me and u seem to be on the same page w/ him.But I can not project any Rookie w/ a 5+ YPC until I see it. The 4.5 I projected was a little generous IMO. And 7 TDs... seriously doubt he gets over 4 as long as MBIII is healthy.If I were to project right now, off the cuff:Barber 270 carries, 4.5 YPC, 1215 yards, 23 rec, 160 yards, 12 TDsJones 145 carries, 5.1 YPC, 786 yards, 42 rec, 412 yards, 7 TDs
switz said:Barber averaged 4.8YPC last season, with far less speed than Jones has. I think your YPC for both is far below what it will be.I also can't see Barber getting 300 carries. Most Julius had was 260, I think that's a realistic expectation for Barber. This is still a passing offense.If I were to project right now, off the cuff:Barber 270 carries, 4.5 YPC, 1215 yards, 23 rec, 160 yards, 12 TDsJones 145 carries, 5.1 YPC, 786 yards, 42 rec, 412 yards, 7 TDsKellysHeroes said:Getting back to the subject...JJ avg 11.75 touches a game last yr / MBIII avg 15.5Dallas was 21th in the league w/ 419 attempts... I would say that # increases this yr as well... 450 would be the ceiling (that would put them in the top 10 of attempts, so that # maybe high).MBIII load should increase now that their paying him 47M and hes the starter... I would venture that they limit him too 300 carries which equals 18.75 carries a game. Toss in 20 or so Recs and that gives u 20 Touchs a week for Barber.Give Felix 150 Carries w/ 40 recs and u get about 12 touches a game.So thats my analysis of the situation.MBIII w/ 300 Carries @ a 4.2 YPC = 1260 yds plus 20 Recs for 140 yds. Double Digit TDsJones w/ 150 Carries @ a 4.5 YPC = 675 yds plus 40 Recs for 320.. 3 TDsI believe thats the Ceiling for Jones unless Barber gets injuried at some pt.
me and you both.switz said:Barber averaged 4.8YPC last season, with far less speed than Jones has. I think your YPC for both is far below what it will be.I also can't see Barber getting 300 carries. Most Julius had was 260, I think that's a realistic expectation for Barber. This is still a passing offense.If I were to project right now, off the cuff:Barber 270 carries, 4.5 YPC, 1215 yards, 23 rec, 160 yards, 12 TDsJones 145 carries, 5.1 YPC, 786 yards, 42 rec, 412 yards, 7 TDsKellysHeroes said:Getting back to the subject...JJ avg 11.75 touches a game last yr / MBIII avg 15.5Dallas was 21th in the league w/ 419 attempts... I would say that # increases this yr as well... 450 would be the ceiling (that would put them in the top 10 of attempts, so that # maybe high).MBIII load should increase now that their paying him 47M and hes the starter... I would venture that they limit him too 300 carries which equals 18.75 carries a game. Toss in 20 or so Recs and that gives u 20 Touchs a week for Barber.Give Felix 150 Carries w/ 40 recs and u get about 12 touches a game.So thats my analysis of the situation.MBIII w/ 300 Carries @ a 4.2 YPC = 1260 yds plus 20 Recs for 140 yds. Double Digit TDsJones w/ 150 Carries @ a 4.5 YPC = 675 yds plus 40 Recs for 320.. 3 TDsI believe thats the Ceiling for Jones unless Barber gets injuried at some pt.As a Felix owner in a couple of dynasty leagues, Id be ok with this kind of production
I dont think he'll get 7 tds unless he just consistantly rips off long ones. Once they get inside the 20's he has about a 10% chance of scoring(just threw out a number) One thing thats not deniable is Barber's presence in the red zone. I like his yardage but your td prediction.Mine or Switz...Switz's Projections would put in Rookie #2 for sure
Personally.. I like the projections from the 5 FBG Staffers: http://subscribers.footballguys.com/players/JoneFe00-1.phpRSH YD Y/R TD REC YD Y/R TD FPTI dont think he'll get 7 tds unless he just consistantly rips off long ones. Once they get inside the 20's he has about a 10% chance of scoring(just threw out a number) One thing thats not deniable is Barber's presence in the red zone. I like his yardage but your td prediction.Mine or Switz...
Switz's Projections would put in Rookie #2 for sure
Smith, Wood, and Tremblay are seriously low on rush attempts, when you review the Julius/Barber split.4.0 and 4.2 IMO are very low YPCs considering the situations he will likely run in.Personally.. I like the projections from the 5 FBG Staffers: http://subscribers.footballguys.com/players/JoneFe00-1.php
RSH YD Y/R TD REC YD Y/R TD FPT
David Dodds 155 620 4.0 3 17 126 7.4 1 99
Chris Smith 100 549 5.5 4 20 220 11.0 1 107
Bob Henry 145 638 4.4 4 24 211 8.8 1 115
Jason Wood 120 600 5.0 4 15 150 10.0 0 99
Maurile Tremblay 94 393 4.2 3 14 109 7.8 0 68
None of them have Jones touching 900, never mind 1K total yds.
From NFL experience, sure. Barber has three years, Felix has none.However, coming out of college, Barber had a career total of 18 receptions. 13 of those came his final season in college. Average per reception? 9.1Jones, in his last college season alone had 16 receptions for an 11.0 average per reception. For his three years in college he had 39 receptions with a 9.8 average per reception.I'm not sure, based on that, that anyone could say Barber is a better receiver. And since his coach is already comparing Felix Jones to Thurman Thomas, one of the best pass catching RBs in the history of the NFL, I'd be hard pressed to think Barber is a better receiver.Don't see why everyone thinks Felix will get more receptions than Barber. MB is a much better receiving threat than Felix is, IMO.
If they are planning on splitting him out at times, then I could see him getting catches without blitz pickup being an issue. But I agree in general, he'll have to prove he can pass block to see the majority of the third down work. I still predict 40+ receptions this season.I agree that Felix is likely to be a devastating weapon when he gets the ball in space as a receiver, but wonder how he'll do in blitz pickup. Until he settles in as a pass blocker I think that MBIII will see most of the 3rd down work. When that happens is anyone's guess, but predicting Jones to catch more balls than Barber in 2008 seems risky to me for that reason. Dynasty wise, I agree that he'll settle in to a 50+ catch role eventually.
This definately helped Jones's stock on my sheet. He was the rookie I was haveing the hardest time wiht. His listed height to weight ratio was my biggest concern about him. Being at least one inch shorter and 7 pounds heavier puts Jones much closer to what you want for starter material. In fact, it makes him look better than McFadden. I'd actually call Jones 5' 11" and McFadden 6' 2" just because I'd always round up but he's 3 full inches shorter and only 4 pounds lighter. Yes, he's definately closer to the ideal ratio than Johnson. I did state that it was argueable but didnt realize Jones size was that different than what he was being listed as.Jones is actually 5'10" 207, which is a big difference from 6'0 200. He's still a bit light, but he's bigger than Chris Johnson.We saw 3 undersized RBs go in the first round this year. Of the three, Jones is argueably the most undersized at 6'0 200 lbs. Everybody realizes he's got playmaker talent. But he wasnt a full time back in college and was drafted by a team (with a good offense) who hasnt used a full time back in years and just signed Barber to a big contract. There are a lot of X factors in play with Jones so its easy to see why his perceived value is all over the board.
Jones w/ 150 Carries @ a 4.5 YPC = 675 yds plus 40 Recs for 320.. 3 TDs
I believe thats the Ceiling for Jones unless Barber gets injuried at some pt.
Since someone called me out about my Barber projections... I thought I'd bump this little gem...FYI Jones after three games on pace forI can live w/ ur Barber Projection... me and u seem to be on the same page w/ him.But I can not project any Rookie w/ a 5+ YPC until I see it. The 4.5 I projected was a little generous IMO. And 7 TDs... seriously doubt he gets over 4 as long as MBIII is healthy.If I were to project right now, off the cuff:
Barber 270 carries, 4.5 YPC, 1215 yards, 23 rec, 160 yards, 12 TDs
Jones 145 carries, 5.1 YPC, 786 yards, 42 rec, 412 yards, 7 TDs
Jones w/ 150 Carries @ a 4.5 YPC = 675 yds plus 40 Recs for 320.. 3 TDs
I believe thats the Ceiling for Jones unless Barber gets injuried at some pt.Since someone called me out about my Barber projections... I thought I'd bump this little gem...FYI Jones after three games on pace forI can live w/ ur Barber Projection... me and u seem to be on the same page w/ him.But I can not project any Rookie w/ a 5+ YPC until I see it. The 4.5 I projected was a little generous IMO. And 7 TDs... seriously doubt he gets over 4 as long as MBIII is healthy.If I were to project right now, off the cuff:
Barber 270 carries, 4.5 YPC, 1215 yards, 23 rec, 160 yards, 12 TDs
Jones 145 carries, 5.1 YPC, 786 yards, 42 rec, 412 yards, 7 TDs
96 carries, 8.3 YPC, 789 yards, 16 rec, 48 yards, 11 TDs
Barber is on pace for...
331 carries, 4.6 YPC, 1520 yards, 53 rec, 464 yards, 27 TDs
It's early, and I was way way way off on Barber's attempts... but:
my yardage estimate (786) and Jones prorated yards (789) are really close
my receptions estimate between the two (while I had players backwards) is really close (65 estimated versus 69 prorated)
my YPC guess is almost dead on for Barber (4.5 versus 4.6)
m'eh... we all get some right, we all get some wrong... but it was a fun thing to review
I've spent a good bit of time trying to think of what player Felix most reminds me of. At first, I thought it might be a young Marshall Faulk. And it still might be down the road. But for now, a young, Denver Broncos' Clinton Portis is the best fit I've seen so far. Similar explosiveness, vision. Similar acceleration.Portis is a pretty big back now, having spent several years in NFL weight programs. He didnt start out that way though. He was a bit wiry when he first entered the league, much like Felix. Felix is reportedly a very hard worker, so I'd be surprised if he doesnt significantly improve his strength/size by next year.I know I'll get smashed for this but I see the same potential in Jones that I saw in Portis. Both guys or pure electricity when they get the ball. Now I dont know if Jones has the same work ethic as Portis but I clearly remember alot of people saying that Portis was just a COP and that he was too small. Heck even his coach said it. Both guys have comparable size and speed although I think portis had alittle more upper body strength and build.
Yes, I admitted my reception estimates were off in my above posting. Shoot me for listening to Jason Garrett.Actually switz the thing you're way way way off on is the 60-80 receptions you were predicting for Jones toward the tail end of preseason. 4-5 per game was what you were expecting, IIRC. So far it's been 1 total.
So far, so good. All he needs is the touches. Obviously, he still has to play behind Barber, but I think it's fair to say that as the season wears on and Felix gets more involved in the offense, especially the passing game, he's going to put up some pretty nice numbers to say the least. The ability is unquestionably there and plain to see already, and he's "faster" than Westbrook. Much faster.You're giving your rookie RB a year to show he's Westbrook?Time will tell, smart ###.Look me up in December.fixedThink "Brian Westbrook" Kevin Faulk in the Cowboys offense, and there you have it.![]()