this looks interesting. I've never done hits.thoughts on going 8 by 4?
skaters: G, A, Pts, PPP, +/-, PIM, Hits, SOG
goalies: W, GAA, SV%, SHO
going to stick with those 8 categories for skaters. looks like TSN projects for the same exact categories so that's good enough for me.Bill Brasky said:this looks interesting. I've never done hits.thoughts on going 8 by 4?
skaters: G, A, Pts, PPP, +/-, PIM, Hits, SOG
goalies: W, GAA, SV%, SHO
the other option to make goalie less valuable is to drop shutouts out.
I would not mind both but I think we need to reverse the PIM scoring. Least PIM's get the highest score. I am all for fighting but I hate having to put one dimensional players with no other value on my league. Plus if your guy gets a 10 game mis. It is a positive thing. It should not be a positive thing.Speaking of random, any thoughts on hits rather than PIM?
That's why hits instead of PIM makes more sense, it rewards players who play physical, not ones who hurt their team with a penalty. I don't have a problem having both of them in there though, with PIM counted as usual, the more skater categories, the less it becomes best goalie(s) wins.I would not mind both but I think we need to reverse the PIM scoring. Least PIM's get the highest score. I am all for fighting but I hate having to put one dimensional players with no other value on my league. Plus if your guy gets a 10 game mis. It is a positive thing. It should not be a positive thing.Speaking of random, any thoughts on hits rather than PIM?
always positiveCurious, do you use PIM as a positive or a negative?
Yeah, just strikes me as funny since most times taking penalties is a bad thing.always positiveCurious, do you use PIM as a positive or a negative?
there's no option otherwise (in yahoo anyway), but I could see it being used like turnovers in basketball.
well, most of the guys who pile up penalty minutes are done through fighting or arguing with the ref. those don't generally hurt the team that much.Yeah, just strikes me as funny since most times taking penalties is a bad thing.always positiveCurious, do you use PIM as a positive or a negative?
there's no option otherwise (in yahoo anyway), but I could see it being used like turnovers in basketball.
I like this idea, the stats are a little hommerish but I am for it.well, most of the guys who pile up penalty minutes are done through fighting or arguing with the ref. those don't generally hurt the team that much.Yeah, just strikes me as funny since most times taking penalties is a bad thing.always positiveCurious, do you use PIM as a positive or a negative?
there's no option otherwise (in yahoo anyway), but I could see it being used like turnovers in basketball.
I think the reasoning behind using PIM is it gives added value to players who don't contribute in the traditional categories. also players who are more physical will tend to get more PIM so it does reward that type of play to some extent.
could also use blocked shots as another alternative to make dmen and penalty killers more valuable.
faceoffs suck for wingers and defensemen.agrre that PIM is not a good category
Faceoffs is a good one...
,sPIMs is an awesome category.
The team had Brian Elliott in their lineup to start the season. Halak was pulled midway through the 1st game and Elliott posted a perfect 13 saves on 13 shots over 32 minutes in a shootout win. The team waited longer than everyone else to draft their goalies as they planned to be strong in two categories and punt the other two. After getting such a great result right away, they chose to never start another goalie the rest of the year. So, based on standings, they were getting max points in both GAA (0.00) and SV% (1.000) and would finish about average across all 4 goalie categories for 32 minutes of playing time.curious what the "loophole" was...
Bumpnew owners, I need you to send me your email address and then I will send you an invite from yahoo.
Live Draft is scheduled for Monday night (9/30) at 8:00pm Central time with a 1:15 timer per pick.
I am all for people having ifights. (chet this is cav/icalkies) But this one is just wrong. Chet I saw your angle two years ago, but I didn't think 25$ was worth messing up the league. I get the win all costs thing and you had every right to do what you did. Rude was protecting people who paid 25 dollars and the money matters, I get that.Tongue in cheek? Bull####.the cheating comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously. was tongue in cheek.I was playing along with the comments in the other thread:You brought it up. Not me.Been running this league for almost a decade now. I have many friends on these boards and I post under my own name so I'm not hiding anything.
Sorry if I did a bad job as commish and falsely accused you. Like I said, I'm moving on.
Clearly you haven't moved on. Only when I started to defend myself did you wave the white flag.
there was a loophole that I missed and you and your co-owner had a viable strategy to take advantage of it that played out very well. I tried to come up with a compromise that I thought was fair to you and the rest of the league, but I didn't like being put in that position and hope to avoid that if at all possible in the future. I got very stressed out at the time, and didn't make any decisions lightly.FatUncleJerryBuss said:Rude got a lot of CRAP last year from chet's bs, I would like him to run it again but if not I will as a last resort.
IN................Hopefully for a RUDE run league!
:rudemuchlove:
just hoping to keep this league as fun and low-stress as possible. not looking for any more drama.
If you're not looking for drama, don't lie and accuse me of cheating especially when I followed the rules. I didn't complain when you abused your power last year because I didn't want to rock the boat any more than I had even though I followed your instructions and rules. I meekly accepted your decision and moved on. You then write on a public message board that I cheated.
Don't ever ask me for my hockey tickets again. I will burn them before ever giving them to you again.
I appreciate that and was never upset at Rud for protecting the league. At the time, I said I didn't agree but would respect his decision.FatUncleJerryBuss said:I am all for people having ifights. (chet this is cav/icalkies) But this one is just wrong. Chet I saw your angle two years ago, but I didn't think 25$ was worth messing up the league. I get the win all costs thing and you had every right to do what you did. Rude was protecting people who paid 25 dollars and the money matters, I get that. I met chet personally and he is a great guy, I have never met Rude but he is as fair as fair can be.Tongue in cheek? Bull####.the cheating comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously. was tongue in cheek.I was playing along with the comments in the other thread:You brought it up. Not me.Been running this league for almost a decade now. I have many friends on these boards and I post under my own name so I'm not hiding anything.
Sorry if I did a bad job as commish and falsely accused you. Like I said, I'm moving on.
Clearly you haven't moved on. Only when I started to defend myself did you wave the white flag.
there was a loophole that I missed and you and your co-owner had a viable strategy to take advantage of it that played out very well. I tried to come up with a compromise that I thought was fair to you and the rest of the league, but I didn't like being put in that position and hope to avoid that if at all possible in the future. I got very stressed out at the time, and didn't make any decisions lightly.FatUncleJerryBuss said:Rude got a lot of CRAP last year from chet's bs, I would like him to run it again but if not I will as a last resort.
IN................Hopefully for a RUDE run league!
:rudemuchlove:
just hoping to keep this league as fun and low-stress as possible. not looking for any more drama.
If you're not looking for drama, don't lie and accuse me of cheating especially when I followed the rules. I didn't complain when you abused your power last year because I didn't want to rock the boat any more than I had even though I followed your instructions and rules. I meekly accepted your decision and moved on. You then write on a public message board that I cheated.
Don't ever ask me for my hockey tickets again. I will burn them before ever giving them to you again.
I said chet was an #### for doing what he did, if there way money that mattered at the end of it I would have done what he did. Rude was protecting the other people. Personally I would not change the rule in season but WTF, chet had his best interest in hand and Rude had the leagues best interest in hand. I respect both.
Chet join and have fun, it is what is all about. Does not need to be any hate or bad feelings.
I've seen everything now.FatUncleJerryBuss said:I am all for people having ifights. (chet this is cav/icalkies) But this one is just wrong. Chet I saw your angle two years ago, but I didn't think 25$ was worth messing up the league. I get the win all costs thing and you had every right to do what you did. Rude was protecting people who paid 25 dollars and the money matters, I get that.Tongue in cheek? Bull####.the cheating comment wasn't meant to be taken seriously. was tongue in cheek.I was playing along with the comments in the other thread:You brought it up. Not me.Been running this league for almost a decade now. I have many friends on these boards and I post under my own name so I'm not hiding anything.
Sorry if I did a bad job as commish and falsely accused you. Like I said, I'm moving on.
Clearly you haven't moved on. Only when I started to defend myself did you wave the white flag.
there was a loophole that I missed and you and your co-owner had a viable strategy to take advantage of it that played out very well. I tried to come up with a compromise that I thought was fair to you and the rest of the league, but I didn't like being put in that position and hope to avoid that if at all possible in the future. I got very stressed out at the time, and didn't make any decisions lightly.FatUncleJerryBuss said:Rude got a lot of CRAP last year from chet's bs, I would like him to run it again but if not I will as a last resort.
IN................Hopefully for a RUDE run league!
:rudemuchlove:
just hoping to keep this league as fun and low-stress as possible. not looking for any more drama.
If you're not looking for drama, don't lie and accuse me of cheating especially when I followed the rules. I didn't complain when you abused your power last year because I didn't want to rock the boat any more than I had even though I followed your instructions and rules. I meekly accepted your decision and moved on. You then write on a public message board that I cheated.
Don't ever ask me for my hockey tickets again. I will burn them before ever giving them to you again.
I met chet personally and he is a great guy, I have never met Rude but he is as fair as fair can be.
I said chet was an #### for doing what he did, if there way money that mattered at the end of it I would have done what he did. Rude was protecting the other people. Personally I would not change the rule in season but WTF, chet had his best interest in hand and Rude had the leagues best interest in hand. I respect both.
Chet join and have fun, it is what is all about. Does not need to be any hate or bad feelings.
They draft lastWhat do we do if not everyone checks in with dice rolls?
Aaron can roll for anyone as long as he has their email address. Same difference.What do we do if not everyone checks in with dice rolls?
BOCA1d1000, rolled once.
Roll set 1
Die rolls: 990
Roll subtotal: 990
Roll total: 990
need an email addressAaron, can you send Cherry's Kids the info again.