What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

Raider Nation said:
Billy Bats said:
Brandon Wheedon? Good game Cleveland.
:goodposting: What else is on?

Weeden is bad enough as it is. But with no reps and coming off an injury?
Defense and special teams!!! :football:
There goes the under.

:kicksrock:
With the Bills run-run-pass-punt offense and Wheedon, there's still hope.
I know it's a parlay, but if my Browns -3.5/U41 pushes/holds, I'm done gambling forever. That's miracle city with this little wiggle room. Was expecting this to be another TNF snooze fest on offense. Oof.

 
Feeling better.Forgot it was the Bills.
Initially bothered me when I read this...but then I figured it could be worse I could be a raiders fan :football:
That's some great posting
The 5th time would have been the charm.

:sadbanana:
When I type "wide left" into Google, wide left buffalo is the 3rd search term.

HTH
THANKS FOR THE WARNING, man :rant: . I tried this and broke out in a cold sweat after seeing almost EVERY OTHER RESULT on that page.

 
:sadbanana: I had a trade sitting in my league for EJ Manuel and the guy accepted as soon as he went down. Hope the rest of the pieces fall in place for me and EJ is fine.

And Bills have to hope EJ is fine and no concerns with the knee. If not, season is :toilet: , worse than it appeared before. RN may actually have a slid argument making fun of the Bills if Tuel is the QB of the future.

 
So with the one survivor spot where I took the Packers, it would be wise to stick with them instead of switching to CLE?
I think you'll be OK, although the Lions did just break one 0-22 streak in Washington. I think the Pack really needs this game though...I just wonder if they don't have some better match ups down the road
I don't know if you noticed or not (I am "Snake Stabler" in the pool) but I changed my pick from GB to CLE at the last minute. I didn't say anything because I didn't want to jinx it, but MAN... that was stressful.

I chickened out on the Packers because they are unable to stop the forward pass. Detroit is the wrong team to be playing when you have that issue.

 
So with the one survivor spot where I took the Packers, it would be wise to stick with them instead of switching to CLE?
I think you'll be OK, although the Lions did just break one 0-22 streak in Washington. I think the Pack really needs this game though...I just wonder if they don't have some better match ups down the road
I don't know if you noticed or not (I am "Snake Stabler" in the pool) but I changed my pick from GB to CLE at the last minute. I didn't say anything because I didn't want to jinx it, but MAN... that was stressful.I chickened out on the Packers because they are unable to stop the forward pass. Detroit is the wrong team to be playing when you have that issue.
That's a good move. Was typing up a reply to your original post about switching to Cleveland but stopped when I realized I was agreeing with taking Cleveland. But it has more to do with me thinking Detroit wins outright on Sunday. Nice play after all. :thumbup:

 
Here's one for you Chainsaw

@Johnny_Detroit: Teams coming off a bye and favored on the road over the past 10 years are 70% against the spread in the NFL.

P.S. It's the Panthers
If you bump the days of rest up to a full 13, which is how many the Panthers will be on, it increases to 34-10-1 (77.3%). And, assuming they are lined as the favorite, you will have another opportunity to play this trend in week 6 with the Steelers.

 
Liking RB already putting up the lines for the Bellator fights tomorrow, going to be opening the wallet a bit for this one:

Lavar Johnson -220

Leone +175

Butcher +255

Ward +130

haven't seen a ton on a lot of these guys, but putting good size coin down on each because I got a feeling...........That tomorrow night's going to be a good night..... :fro:

 
mo, how come a lot of the guys you always like are pretty large dogs? I'm not complaining, mind you.... just curious. Do the oddsmakers just suck at setting MMA lines?

 
:sadbanana: I had a trade sitting in my league for EJ Manuel and the guy accepted as soon as he went down. Hope the rest of the pieces fall in place for me and EJ is fine.

And Bills have to hope EJ is fine and no concerns with the knee. If not, season is :toilet: , worse than it appeared before. RN may actually have a slid argument making fun of the Bills if Tuel is the QB of the future.
That's some dirty pool IMO.

 
:sadbanana: I had a trade sitting in my league for EJ Manuel and the guy accepted as soon as he went down. Hope the rest of the pieces fall in place for me and EJ is fine.

And Bills have to hope EJ is fine and no concerns with the knee. If not, season is :toilet: , worse than it appeared before. RN may actually have a slid argument making fun of the Bills if Tuel is the QB of the future.
That's some dirty pool IMO.
While I agree with that....if EJ manuel is your starting QB you better be in a 32 team league

 
mo, how come a lot of the guys you always like are pretty large dogs? I'm not complaining, mind you.... just curious. Do the oddsmakers just suck at setting MMA lines?
:goodposting:
I watched Mo back a fighter at -2000 to cap off the night once, who ended up eventually winning, but at one point during the fight had gotten so compromised in an armbar that Rogan was shouting, "He is breaking his arm!! He is breaking his arm!!" It was a close one. One time Mo also talked me in to going big on the last fight of the night instead of going to bed when Silva knocked out Brian Stann and paid out +270.

 
mo, how come a lot of the guys you always like are pretty large dogs? I'm not complaining, mind you.... just curious. Do the oddsmakers just suck at setting MMA lines?
:goodposting:
Tends to be the route with the bellator shows, lines are always heavy toward the favorites. UFC shows are much more balanced. I know I do tend to go the dogs if I have had a rough patch for a bit just because of the nature of MMA. I'm sure I am more balanced with UFC, but the bellator lines are just set heavy toward favorites that don't justify it.Eta: perfect example is the main event tonight with Kongo in it. I think he wins but he is something like -550 it something. That is just horrible, ha me tempted to take the guy he is fighting an I don't know much about him at all. Kongo has been ko'd a lot lately and is not a particularly good fighter, and he is close to 40. He should win, but that line is just dumb

Eta2: sending this from my phone at work, crazy the typos. Sorry

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cowherd's blazing 5.

He's 6-13-2 on the season with his first winning week last week. (3-2)

Patriots (+1) at Bengals

Panthers (-2) at Cardinals

Eagles (+2.5) at Giants

Texans (+6.5) at 49ers

Lions at Packers (-7)

 
I got a horse right here, his name is Paul Revere...

Actually it's a she and her name is Truly Awesome. 6th at Santa Anita. 20-1 m/l, worth a few bucks, IMO, ATB, HTH, GLLLALL.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top