What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (5 Viewers)

'Raider Nation said:
Federer -250 to chase? :unsure:
Click to expand...
I have it at -330, which is why I'm thinking about Del Potro, so good line for you if you like him. They are saying the heat is going to affect Del Potro, especially if it goes longer. Then again, they said the same about Clijsters, ####ers. :bag:
 
'Raider Nation said:
Seriously though, how is Woz the #1 player in the world?? Nice serve and volley game, not many unforced errors... ZERO power or put-away shots.
Click to expand...
Complete math. She's never even won a major and I think at least Sharapova is a better tennis player.We're at a changing of the guard with womens tennis right now with the Williams sisters all but irrelevant. Going to be a mish mash of players and none of them Americans.Looked like Melanie Oudin was going to be a solid competitor after her run at the US Open last year but she has faded into obscurity.
 
Say what you want, RN, but we weren't that far from taking that thing. 3 points from winning the 2nd set, with a decided conditioning edge in the third, in horrible heat. Damm.

But, WE MOVE ON.

 
Costs $1.25 to get the 3 points now. I wonder if Vegas will come off the 3 or just continue to up the vig on the Giants?

 
'PatsFanCT said:
Just took Memphis +6.5 in live betting when they were down 6 and the Griz on a roll.Of course I'll lose...
Click to expand...
This was with about 4 minutes to go in the game. It was like betting on the Kentucky Derby in a two horse race.I Almost feel like Fiona Gallagher and returning the money, except not really feeling like doing it.
 
http://forums.footba...0#entry14047248

Just posted this in the shark pool, but maybe someone here knows. Right now at sportsbook both teams are -105 to get the ball at the start of the game. I know the Pats always defer. So my question is if the Giants do not always defer that makes a Giants to start the game with the ball bet a very good value.

I assume that the giants must always defer, but it doesn't hurt to ask.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

The Gods did everything in their power to COMPLETELY screw me today...

u5 in the Kings game was the one last hope I had tonight. They went to the 3rd period 4-0 (one on a penalty shot ... :lmao: ), then after the inevitable goal to push early in the 3rd, the Kings pumped home a goal, which after review came 0.0000000000000002 seconds after the final horn.

WE PUSH! WE PUSH!!!

 
'The Ref said:
Now lets see how the Sens do tonight vs the Kings. :thumbup: Might have to put in a few losers here other wise we might get shut off.
Click to expand...
Update:16-8 +10.6 UnitsI don't want to hear a peep if this turns on us now.That said we got two games tomorrow that we are VERY eager to see what the shot line is set at. We may have a rare two 4 star plays in one day. lets hope the line maker is asleep at the wheel.
 
Buffalo couldn't beat a college team right now, but they do get Ehrhoff back and that should be big.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'The Ref said:
http://forums.footba...0#entry14047248

Just posted this in the shark pool, but maybe someone here knows. Right now at sportsbook both teams are -105 to get the ball at the start of the game. I know the Pats always defer. So my question is if the Giants do not always defer that makes a Giants to start the game with the ball bet a very good value.

I assume that the giants must always defer, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Click to expand...
Dude, this killed me, and many others here a few years ago when Pittsburgh played the Cards. All year long the Steelers deferred, so everyone and his brother bet the Cards get the ball first.Steelers won the toss, and took the ball.

Don't do it.

 
'The Ref said:
http://forums.footba...0#entry14047248

Just posted this in the shark pool, but maybe someone here knows. Right now at sportsbook both teams are -105 to get the ball at the start of the game. I know the Pats always defer. So my question is if the Giants do not always defer that makes a Giants to start the game with the ball bet a very good value.

I assume that the giants must always defer, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Click to expand...
The Giants deferred against SF.
 
'PatsFanCT said:
'The Ref said:
http://forums.footba...0#entry14047248

Just posted this in the shark pool, but maybe someone here knows. Right now at sportsbook both teams are -105 to get the ball at the start of the game. I know the Pats always defer. So my question is if the Giants do not always defer that makes a Giants to start the game with the ball bet a very good value.

I assume that the giants must always defer, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Click to expand...
Dude, this killed me, and many others here a few years ago when Pittsburgh played the Cards. All year long the Steelers deferred, so everyone and his brother bet the Cards get the ball first.Steelers won the toss, and took the ball.

Don't do it.
Click to expand...
I got caught in that as well. At the end of the day I don't think the max bet on these things are set so high that me/thebook are going to go broke. if it's a good edge I'm taking it.

 
'The Ref said:
'PatsFanCT said:
'The Ref said:
http://forums.footba...0#entry14047248

Just posted this in the shark pool, but maybe someone here knows. Right now at sportsbook both teams are -105 to get the ball at the start of the game. I know the Pats always defer. So my question is if the Giants do not always defer that makes a Giants to start the game with the ball bet a very good value.

I assume that the giants must always defer, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Click to expand...
Dude, this killed me, and many others here a few years ago when Pittsburgh played the Cards. All year long the Steelers deferred, so everyone and his brother bet the Cards get the ball first.Steelers won the toss, and took the ball.

Don't do it.
Click to expand...
I got caught in that as well. At the end of the day I don't think the max bet on these things are set so high that me/thebook are going to go broke. if it's a good edge I'm taking it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I hear ya. It could be a good bet, but that scenario tells me that the Super Bowl is a whole different game plan, and thus -105 is really what it should be. A coin toss bet.
 
Rangers/Lightning/Canucks 3 team parlay, ML (1/2 unit)

2012 Posted Picks

CBB-45-31-1

NFL-4-0

NBA-5-5-1

CFB-1-0

NHL-5-3

 
'PatsFanCT said:
'The Ref said:
http://forums.footba...0#entry14047248

Just posted this in the shark pool, but maybe someone here knows. Right now at sportsbook both teams are -105 to get the ball at the start of the game. I know the Pats always defer. So my question is if the Giants do not always defer that makes a Giants to start the game with the ball bet a very good value.

I assume that the giants must always defer, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Click to expand...
Dude, this killed me, and many others here a few years ago when Pittsburgh played the Cards. All year long the Steelers deferred, so everyone and his brother bet the Cards get the ball first.Steelers won the toss, and took the ball.

Don't do it.
Click to expand...
That was led by among many me a few years back on the AZ/Pitt game. Played a ton on AZ to get the ball first - they took the ball in all but 1 game that year and Pitt deferred every time. Of course, AZ wins toss and defers. Cost me 14% of what I bet on that game and the game didn't even start (let alone all the props I had tied to that).NE deferred every time this year. Gmen were a bit more on the split side:

SF - def

Atl - rec

NE - rec

Dallas - def

GB - rec

I think betting Giants to get ball first is a decent bet but I won't go overboard on it. I'll hope NE wins the toss.

 
I picked this nugget up elsewhere: Vanderbilt is 19-9 ATS with double conference revenge; Tennessee is 0-5 ATS vs. conf. foes with double revenge

Something to think about. I bet very little on hoops or hockey as I am really out of my element, but for you college hoops gurus.. thoughts?

 
'Angry Beavers said:
I picked this nugget up elsewhere: Vanderbilt is 19-9 ATS with double conference revenge; Tennessee is 0-5 ATS vs. conf. foes with double revengeSomething to think about. I bet very little on hoops or hockey as I am really out of my element, but for you college hoops gurus.. thoughts?
Click to expand...
So you're saying there's a chance? :excited:
 
I wish Kurts site allowed a parlay of tennis matchups. Murray laying way too much, but there's also zero percent chance he loses. Would have loved to pair it up with Azarenka in a parlay

 
'Angry Beavers said:
I picked this nugget up elsewhere: Vanderbilt is 19-9 ATS with double conference revenge; Tennessee is 0-5 ATS vs. conf. foes with double revengeSomething to think about. I bet very little on hoops or hockey as I am really out of my element, but for you college hoops gurus.. thoughts?
Click to expand...
I don't need much to jump in.That's good enough for me to play. Vandy -9
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Already have NYR parlayed with the Devils and Nucks. Don't feel like laying the -240 flat with the Rangers, so let's try the u5 (+105) instead. New York doesn't score all that much, and I'd be shocked if Winnipeg got more than one past Lundqvist.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
Texas floods
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
Mrs. Rannous
Mrs. Rannous
scorchy
Any banking guys that can offer solutions to a vexing issue?
Replies
31
Views
628
Mrs. Rannous
Mrs. Rannous
Skipdog77
Walking Style, what say you?
Replies
31
Views
379
FarFromHome
FarFromHome

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Back
Top