FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (4 Viewers)

[TheGooRoo]

On Evo, I believe last kickoff no touchback -115 (Warm Up Props) is a good bet.

 

[John Bender]

Kurt - if the Giants win, I'm taking you and your wife to see CATS.

 

[cosjobs]

FIRST TEAM TO KICKOFF WILL BE (OPENING KICKOFF)

NYG +250

NE -300

If we assume Bellichik will defer receiving a kickoff to the second half and the NYG will receive if given the choice, -300 seems fair for an apparent lock.

And if we can make that assumption there are a ton of related bets that offer value- if we can assume NY will get the ball first... but unsure if I can make that leap or not.

I know BB loves to score in bunches- so he almost always defers, hoping to score last in the first half and get the ball and score again opening the second half. I do not see why he would abandon that philosophy now.

No one has thoughts on this? NE has deferred 28 straight times. And the last time they did not defer- Brady tore his ligaments...Only way to lose, it seems would be for NYG to win toss and defer. I just don't see them doing that in a SB

 

[PatsFanCT]

FIRST TEAM TO KICKOFF WILL BE (OPENING KICKOFF)

NYG +250

NE -300

If we assume Bellichik will defer receiving a kickoff to the second half and the NYG will receive if given the choice, -300 seems fair for an apparent lock.

And if we can make that assumption there are a ton of related bets that offer value- if we can assume NY will get the ball first... but unsure if I can make that leap or not.

I know BB loves to score in bunches- so he almost always defers, hoping to score last in the first half and get the ball and score again opening the second half. I do not see why he would abandon that philosophy now.

No one has thoughts on this? NE has deferred 28 straight times. And the last time they did not defer- Brady tore his ligaments...Only way to lose, it seems would be for NYG to win toss and defer. I just don't see them doing that in a SB

I's been talked about many times in this thread.The same thing happened in the Pitt / 'Zona game, and the sure bet lost.

 

[DA RAIDERS]

FIRST TEAM TO KICKOFF WILL BE (OPENING KICKOFF)

NYG +250

NE -300

If we assume Bellichik will defer receiving a kickoff to the second half and the NYG will receive if given the choice, -300 seems fair for an apparent lock.

And if we can make that assumption there are a ton of related bets that offer value- if we can assume NY will get the ball first... but unsure if I can make that leap or not.

I know BB loves to score in bunches- so he almost always defers, hoping to score last in the first half and get the ball and score again opening the second half. I do not see why he would abandon that philosophy now.

No one has thoughts on this? NE has deferred 28 straight times. And the last time they did not defer- Brady tore his ligaments...Only way to lose, it seems would be for NYG to win toss and defer. I just don't see them doing that in a SB

I's been talked about many times in this thread.The same thing happened in the Pitt / 'Zona game, and the sure bet lost.

I love the pats taking the ball because of the gronk factor. He'll suffer at halftime and they'll want to maximize him early.

 

[cosjobs]

FIRST TEAM TO KICKOFF WILL BE (OPENING KICKOFF)

NYG +250

NE -300

If we assume Bellichik will defer receiving a kickoff to the second half and the NYG will receive if given the choice, -300 seems fair for an apparent lock.

And if we can make that assumption there are a ton of related bets that offer value- if we can assume NY will get the ball first... but unsure if I can make that leap or not.

I know BB loves to score in bunches- so he almost always defers, hoping to score last in the first half and get the ball and score again opening the second half. I do not see why he would abandon that philosophy now.

No one has thoughts on this? NE has deferred 28 straight times. And the last time they did not defer- Brady tore his ligaments...Only way to lose, it seems would be for NYG to win toss and defer. I just don't see them doing that in a SB

I's been talked about many times in this thread.The same thing happened in the Pitt / 'Zona game, and the sure bet lost.

I love the pats taking the ball because of the gronk factor. He'll suffer at halftime and they'll want to maximize him early.

Then it seems like you'd be all over the +250 for a 50/50 bet?

 

[cosjobs]

Anyone getting NYG minus on the alt run lines? my book only has the option to add points.

 

[The Ref]

Vereen and Faulk are inactive. My under patriots players with rushing attempts just went up in value.

 

[DA RAIDERS]

FIRST TEAM TO KICKOFF WILL BE (OPENING KICKOFF)

NYG +250

NE -300

If we assume Bellichik will defer receiving a kickoff to the second half and the NYG will receive if given the choice, -300 seems fair for an apparent lock.

And if we can make that assumption there are a ton of related bets that offer value- if we can assume NY will get the ball first... but unsure if I can make that leap or not.

I know BB loves to score in bunches- so he almost always defers, hoping to score last in the first half and get the ball and score again opening the second half. I do not see why he would abandon that philosophy now.

No one has thoughts on this? NE has deferred 28 straight times. And the last time they did not defer- Brady tore his ligaments...Only way to lose, it seems would be for NYG to win toss and defer. I just don't see them doing that in a SB

I's been talked about many times in this thread.The same thing happened in the Pitt / 'Zona game, and the sure bet lost.

I love the pats taking the ball because of the gronk factor. He'll suffer at halftime and they'll want to maximize him early.

Then it seems like you'd be all over the +250 for a 50/50 bet?

 

[nittanylion]

Anyone getting NYG minus on the alt run lines? my book only has the option to add points.

Giants -3.5, +170...haven't hit it yet, but strongly considering...

 

[mquinnjr]

Any ochocino props anywhere?I almost wonder if Belichick is diabolocial enough to basically shut him down all year. The Giants don't game plan for him at all and Bill keeps him on the field all game and he goes off. Seriously been thinking about this a lot and I don't think it's crazy

All over this, put some $ on Ocho to win MVP @ +12500 when 5Dimes still had it up. He just cut a guy yesterday, and it's not as if Ochocino is absolutely terrible. Could easily see this happening, worth a small play at those odds at least. The O 0.5 receptions and O 9.5 yards total receiving were like taking candy from a baby under this theory.Could definitely see Gronk on decoy duty if he really isn't up to snuff and Belichick knows it, and going to Ochocino just because it's not expected.

 

[DA RAIDERS]

2u on the pats getting the ball

10 on the patriots

Gl all!!

 

[mquinnjr]

Had the national anthem at 1:34.2 Under looks f'ed.

I love the super bowl.

 

[zander_s]

15 coin flips in a row ????

 

[The Ref]

Had the national anthem at 1:33:5

 

[The Ref]

15 coin flips in a row ????

NFC won 14 in a row. That's. .06% chance

 

[mquinnjr]

Had the national anthem at 1:33:5

$10 stake hopes you're right, Ref. Edit: 5Dimes graded as a loss. Oh well.

 

[modogg]

Sorry, still in Vegas and haven't had time to post plays ... no hoops today, but i have 35u on the Super BowlBallard o8.5 1st rec bigPlus 1000 others

I don't know most of the bets I made, but i know I tailed you here bud!! Good call

 

[Man In The Box]

Anyone tell me who won the toss and if it was heads or tails?

 

[Man In The Box]

TY kind sir.

 

[Clorox]

Heads and Pats

 

[Raider Nation]

Who else had First Score = Safety?

 

[fasteddie_21]

Who else had First Score = Safety?

I want to know the odds on that too plz.

 

[Raider Nation]

Who else had First Score = Safety?

I want to know the odds on that too plz.

Gotta check with MP.

 

[Man In The Box]

Heads and Pats

Was it heads or tails? Dude erased his post that said tails.

 

[Hoos First]

Heads and Pats

Was it heads or tails? Dude erased his post that said tails.

heads, my bad. Tried to delete it quick

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

Giants called tails.

Toss was heads.

Patriots deferred.

 

[Man In The Box]

Heads and Pats

Was it heads or tails? Dude erased his post that said tails.

heads, my bad. Tried to delete it quick

K thanks.

 

[Raider Nation]

Seeing the 8-0 score for a moment, I thought it was an Oregon game.

 

[Clorox]

So I'm sitting on a 9-0 Giants square...after I mocked my wife all week for our horrible numbers

Don't you dare ruin it Brady!

 

[The Ref]

Had the national anthem at 1:33:5

$10 stake hopes you're right, Ref. Edit: 5Dimes graded as a loss. Oh well.

Whoa whoa whoa... What? No way it was over 1:35!

 

[mquinnjr]

Had the national anthem at 1:33:5

$10 stake hopes you're right, Ref. Edit: 5Dimes graded as a loss. Oh well.

Whoa whoa whoa... What? No way it was over 1:35!

I bet under 94 seconds, so I'm guessing official time was 1:34.something, grading my bet a loss. No biggie in the grand scheme of things, I have 25 props and a teaser on this game, it is what it is.

 

[modogg]

So I'm sitting on a 9-0 Giants square...after I mocked my wife all week for our horrible numbers Don't you dare ruin it Brady!

congrats bud!ETA: i just checked my numbers. Actually got great numbers this year like 7,0 a 3,3, and some other good one, and that f'n safety is going to mess everything up. Figures the only year i get great numbers the safety comes in the 1st Q

 

[zander_s]

So I'm sitting on a 9-0 Giants square...after I mocked my wife all week for our horrible numbers Don't you dare ruin it Brady!

congrats bud!ETA: i just checked my numbers. Actually got great numbers this year like 7,0 a 3,3, and some other good one, and that f'n safety is going to mess everything up. Figures the only year i get great numbers the safety comes in the 1st Q

I hear ya bro. I have 7-0 and 3-0 in a $100/square and instantly cringed on that safety!

 

[Clorox]

So I'm sitting on a 9-0 Giants square...after I mocked my wife all week for our horrible numbers Don't you dare ruin it Brady!

congrats bud!ETA: i just checked my numbers. Actually got great numbers this year like 7,0 a 3,3, and some other good one, and that f'n safety is going to mess everything up. Figures the only year i get great numbers the safety comes in the 1st Q

Thanks bud! Maybe there will be a 2 point conversion to get it back to normal for you!ETA - mine was only $5 per square.

 

[mquinnjr]

Under looking good, gentlemen.

 

[The Ref]

Pats wIn by 4. Vegas wins

 

[modogg]

Pats wIn by 4. Vegas wins

ugh, that would be uglyGave it a go with the Giants in the 2nd half +2

 

[Man In The Box]

NYG +2 2H -120

 

[DA RAIDERS]

So I'm sitting on a 9-0 Giants square...after I mocked my wife all week for our horrible numbers Don't you dare ruin it Brady!

Me too!

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Pats wIn by 4. Vegas wins

ugh, that would be uglyGave it a go with the Giants in the 2nd half +2

At -135? The over is dead, might have to lay some of my Giants future off.

 

[mquinnjr]

Pats wIn by 4. Vegas wins

ugh, that would be uglyGave it a go with the Giants in the 2nd half +2

 

[The Ref]

2 units over 27.5 2h.

It's going over

 

[The Ref]

Boom! Fishnets!

 

[DA RAIDERS]

O/u 27??

 

[modogg]

Pats wIn by 4. Vegas wins

ugh, that would be uglyGave it a go with the Giants in the 2nd half +2

At -135? The over is dead, might have to lay some of my Giants future off.

looks like a lot of money came in on NE, the line is a little easier now. That or the nooks prepared for an onslaught with the giants and have come back down

 

[DA RAIDERS]

-2 pats?

 

[mquinnjr]

Didn't see, did Madonna wear a hat during the halftime show yet? Bet she wouldn't.

 

[Man In The Box]

Playing a little O27.5 2H for middle action.

 

[The Ref]

Didn't see, did Madonna wear a hat during the halftime show yet? Bet she wouldn't.

She wore an egyption head dress thing. Kind of like a hat