What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (8 Viewers)

I got a solution for bad announcing in sporting events. It would be kind of like a live podcast - enabling anyone with an internet connection and microphone to produce their own play-by-play commentary and broadcast it out over the internet. There is definitely a need, and if you were good at it, people could pay to subscribe to your service. The problem would be the data delay and getting it synchronized with the image on your TV. Eventually the networks would end up hiring the most popular internet guys, but you would still have regional experts, and new talent would constantly be rising to the top.

 
Normally not a fan of this bet but I think the price is so far off that its better than the ML parlay

Wisconsin +5000(betonline) to win NCAA tourney

These guys are no joke
I bet them at that same number at the beginning of the year, I can't believe it hasn't moved. I with lumpy on this one, grab a piece.
I shall join in as betus has it at +6000
as a big ten guy, wisky will never win it all. They are always built for the B1G, but not for the actual tournament
Rook, we're looking for value here. +6000 on a team that is within the top 5-10 teams in the country is value, regardless of what you think they are built for.
########, there is no value in something that isn't going to win HTH
Somebody needs a lesson in gambling. Stick to props rook.
blow me ######

 
Nets up 31-17 in the 4th to pull within 4 with 10 seconds left. Detroit had this one comfortably. #NBA

update-Nets miss the 3, Detroit rebounds with 4 seconds left, BKYN does not foul. +6 wins.

2 covers in a row for Brooklyn

 
Last edited by a moderator:
maybe one of you player props gurus can help me out here. Who should i start for my playoff game.... beason vs sea, zbrown vs ari, or hali @oak?

 
alright boys, i'll take one for the team. Cutting Frosty's plays to 2/3 of my usual plays, let's get that train back on track

 
By the way, there are a couple of teams we should never bet on but I do sometimes anyway and they always lose. Please ignore any posts of mine advising you to bet on Memphis, Kansas State, Texas, Miami, St. Johns, Missouri, and LSU. These are dumb teams, and every time I bet on them I remind myself that I'm an idiot for betting on dumb teams. I am sure I will bet on these teams again because I will see/read/think something that looks good, but it's always stupid to bet on dumb teams and these are the dumb teams. Illinois is borderline.

 
F it, let's make it 0-5. Taking the Warriors -5 2nd half
Good job finding the better line than where it closed at the tip. You were GS +2 for the game if my math is right. I'm sorry it didn't hit for you but I think your thinking was on point the way GS had been making a habit of 2H comebacks and HOU on a B2B. You could tell that Harden was getting tired there at the end.

 
Do any books accept PayPal? I'm about to come into an avalanche of fantasy football winnings in the next couple of weeks.

(No shtick.)

 
Belichick with the Pats after 2 ATS losses:

Code:
SU: 19-3-0 (14.45, 86.4%)ATS: 15-7-0 (9.55, 68.2%) avg line: -4.9
Away:
Code:
SU: 8-1-0 (17.33, 88.9%)	ATS: 7-2-0 (13.89, 77.8%) avg line: -3.4
 
F it, let's make it 0-5. Taking the Warriors -5 2nd half
Good job finding the better line than where it closed at the tip. You were GS +2 for the game if my math is right. I'm sorry it didn't hit for you but I think your thinking was on point the way GS had been making a habit of 2H comebacks and HOU on a B2B. You could tell that Harden was getting tired there at the end.
yeah, i have been good at missing wins by 1 point as of late.

still got looking to do in UFC, so far i'm on:

Healy -160

Uyenoyama +200

got a few others i like too, but really need some wins here tomorrow. main card has some close fights, so i'm not sure either of the top 2 fights has a clear guy who will win

ETA: Healy actually concerns me a little, but i think that is my love for Bobby Green's flare getting in the way. Seems to be a lot of people liking Healy and i think the rational mind is confident he wins. similar situation with this bet:

Trujillo +110 - dude looked awesome first fight, horrendous since

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do any books accept PayPal? I'm about to come into an avalanche of fantasy football winnings in the next couple of weeks.

(No shtick.)
I have an online only bank account, so this is always an annoyance (but a good one). I've in the past purchased a cashier's check with large sums of cash, which I deposit into my bank account via iPhone app deposit. Your money goes into you checking account in like 2 or so business days, and only inconvenience/cost is going to buy the cashier's check and the cost of it, which is minimal.

 
Army/Navy UNDER 54.5

Seven straight years this game has gone under 48 points, not sure why this year would be different. Both teams know each other extremely well, I see this following recent years.
Gonna be snowing all game, I don't think this one reaches 45. Sitting in the Army section so I have Army +11 and +13 for a half unit each, Army +400 ML to win 1u and 2u on that under.

Go Army beat Navy!

 
nropp had a 10* play last year based mostly on the fact that the team he was backing lost the same game last year, and they'd be out for "revenge." So yeah, #### that guy.

 
Wouldn't be surprised if we get one of those Popovich specials tonight where Parker and Duncan sit.
Looks like it's already being assumed in the line....opened at 9.5 and down to 6.5
Couple 7's out there. If my memory serves me correctly, the line moved 7-8 pts the last time this happened. The value of players is really interesting to me. You would think Duncan and Parker would be worth more than 2-3 points over guys like Diaw and Patty Mills.

 
Army/Navy UNDER 54.5

Seven straight years this game has gone under 48 points, not sure why this year would be different. Both teams know each other extremely well, I see this following recent years.
Gonna be snowing all game, I don't think this one reaches 45. Sitting in the Army section so I have Army +11 and +13 for a half unit each, Army +400 ML to win 1u and 2u on that under.

Go Army beat Navy!
dang best I could do b/ 5 books was under 50.5

 
that army/navy total went from 52 to 49 in a half hour.

played U52 and O49. Let's go 50 points!

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top