JohnnyU said:
Kosar said:
JohnnyU said:
Kosar said:
Do NOT put the trade to a league vote. To me, that's something that a weak commish does. If anything, have 1 or 2 co-commishes to bounce things off of, but not the whole league.
Dangerous precedent there is you do a full league vote.
No it's not. Also, those who say only veto trade based on collusion are full of s--t. You can't prove collusion for one thing, and the life of dynasty leagues is dependent on preventing grossly lopsided trades from ruining leagues by making teams worthless, which makes it almost impossible to find new ownership when they realize their team sucks and bails. Having said that, I'm not so sure that trade is so lopsided. Gore is pretty good.
What does this have to do with putting a vote to the full league? You quoted my statement yet made no attempt to dispute it.
League majority to veto the trade. Now we know that is not without fault, but you have to protect dynasty leagues by allowing this IMO.
That's B.S. - you only need half the league to agree with you to veto a trade? Unless the two owners making the trade get to vote also (meaning there are already two votes for the trade before the race evenb starts), that system SUCKS OUT LOUD.It should be OVERWHELMING opposition - at least 75% of the league to veto a trade. And it should ONLY be democratic likle that if one owner can't reaosnably justify their posiiton.
Your team's trade should not be subject to the other owners' individual motivations. Thati a HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE system. I'd NEVER play in a league that was allowed to vote on my trades and overturn them with only a few other owners participating.