TexanFan02
Footballguy
NopeThis has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice

NopeThis has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice

There's nothing smarmy about me laughing at you guys' dumb statements.NopeThis has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
![]()
no...just really eletist and arrogant as usual.There's nothing smarmy about me laughing at you guys' dumb statements.NopeThis has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
![]()

Why would you damn your peer? He's soaking the guy's supporters for all he can get.Yeah, damn him for trying to get paid for his efforts.I pointed out a lawyer using the press to cash in on his client. I can understand why you don't like that.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
Zimmerman's lawyer knows that Zimmerman is a cash cow that he's going to keep milking.
Then use the right words.no...just really eletist and arrogant as usual.There's nothing smarmy about me laughing at you guys' dumb statements.NopeThis has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
![]()
![]()
How is he soaking them?Why would you damn your peer? He's soaking the guy's supporters for all he can get.Yeah, damn him for trying to get paid for his efforts.I pointed out a lawyer using the press to cash in on his client. I can understand why you don't like that.That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.Not really.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
Zimmerman's lawyer knows that Zimmerman is a cash cow that he's going to keep milking.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.Why are you changing the question?Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.Why are you changing the question?Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.

Classic Christo. Trying to catch up with CH for most dumb post in the thread?Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.Why are you changing the question?Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
![]()
Seriously, I think English is a second language for several of you.Classic Christo. Trying to catch up with CH for most dumb post in the thread?Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.Why are you changing the question?Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
![]()
Christo did not put any words in anyone's mouth. When you call someone a murderer you are labeling them as guilty.Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.Why are you changing the question?Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.Christo did not put any words in anyone's mouth. When you call someone a murderer you are labeling them as guilty.Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.Why are you changing the question?Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
Keep trying, you have some catching up to do. Oh, and smarmy.Seriously, I think English is a second language for several of you.Classic Christo. Trying to catch up with CH for most dumb post in the thread?
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
So now you are assuming he is going to commit perjury.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.

Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
Of yours? You bet!I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
Of yours? You bet!I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
![]()

You're going to have to try a lot harder. Carolina Hustler is lapping you in dumb posts.Of yours? You bet!I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
![]()
![]()
First things first. I've got a lot of work to catch up to you.You're going to have to try a lot harder. Carolina Hustler is lapping you in dumb posts.Of yours? You bet!I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
![]()
![]()
Keep going...First things first. I've got a lot of work to catch up to you.You're going to have to try a lot harder. Carolina Hustler is lapping you in dumb posts.Of yours? You bet!I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.Yet.Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.![]()
![]()
![]()
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Nah, give him money. He killed a Black kid, he's doing the world a favor.Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
You're not going to make this easy, are you?Nah, give him money. He killed a Black kid, he's doing the world a favor.Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
New here?What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
the judge sure has zimmy figured out, but what does he know hahahaha. You seem to know more than the people directly involved in this case. Zimmy`s story has been shown to be full of holes and inconsistencies since it was made public...get with the program bro.What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Holy ####.Carolina Hustler 1614
I would rather be Zimmerman than Martin. Just sayin'.yup...by bringing a gun to a fistfight...how clever and braveThe greatest country on earth. One which allows one to protect himself.what a country we live in when a man can shoot an unarmed teen and get rich afterwards by gun loving zealots throwing money at himIrony of the year....Rev. Al Sharpton criticizing Zimmerman for for how he raised money....![]()
![]()
![]()
How much money was contributed to Casey Anthony's defense fund?

Your double standard on rhetoric is off the charts. You have polar opposite responses to it whether it is from the left or right.I don't believe there will be a riot if Zimmerman is acquitted.
That is ok. I am not going to get with your lynch mob justice program.the judge sure has zimmy figured out, but what does he know hahahaha. You seem to know more than the people directly involved in this case. Zimmy`s story has been shown to be full of holes and inconsistencies since it was made public...get with the program bro.What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small. And you're missing the 3rd alternative:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small. And you're missing the 3rd alternative:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Neither scenario is that accurate. Zimmerman was following him before the dispatcher said anything to him. After the dispatcher informed Zimmerman that he did not need to follow him, it is not clear what happened, if there was further pursuit or if Martin approached Zimmerman. Zimmerman had wounds cleaned up but he refused further treatment. He apparently had a busted nose, bruises on his face and some minor cuts on the back of his head. He did see his own doctor the next day. Witnesses saw them struggling on the ground with one them on top punching. Zimmerman pulled his gun (he claims there was a struggle) and shot Martin as close range.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
About 7:30 p.m.: Zimmerman tells police he shot Martin in self-defense. In a police report, Officer Timothy Smith writes that Zimmerman is bleeding from the nose and back of the head.
Ok. Do people think Zimmerman was doing the punching on top and then decided to shoot him for good measure? Was there any forensic evidence that suggest Zimmerman shot Martin while laying down on his back or while sitting on top of him? Did the bullet exit the body?Neither scenario is that accurate. Zimmerman was following him before the dispatcher said anything to him. After the dispatcher informed Zimmerman that he did not need to follow him, it is not clear what happened, if there was further pursuit or if Martin approached Zimmerman. Zimmerman had wounds cleaned up but he refused further treatment. He apparently had a busted nose, bruises on his face and some minor cuts on the back of his head. He did see his own doctor the next day. Witnesses saw them struggling on the ground with one them on top punching. Zimmerman pulled his gun (he claims there was a struggle) and shot Martin as close range.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Murder 2.On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small. And you're missing the 3rd alternative:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one twoOn what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?
Is it as cut and dry as:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
vs.
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.
If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
And you're missing the 3rd alternative:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
Yeah, and you're not biased for Zimmerman at all.Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one twoOn what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?
Is it as cut and dry as:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
vs.
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.
If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
And you're missing the 3rd alternative:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
The man on top was shot and rolled to the ground, and Zimmerman got up. There is one witness who claims the bigger man was on top, whatever that means. Some spin that as meaning Zimmerman, but that does not fit any of the other facts as we know them. About the only thing i heard from forensics, is that the shot was close range.Ok. Do people think Zimmerman was doing the punching on top and then decided to shoot him for good measure? Was there any forensic evidence that suggest Zimmerman shot Martin while laying down on his back or while sitting on top of him? Did the bullet exit the body?Neither scenario is that accurate. Zimmerman was following him before the dispatcher said anything to him. After the dispatcher informed Zimmerman that he did not need to follow him, it is not clear what happened, if there was further pursuit or if Martin approached Zimmerman. Zimmerman had wounds cleaned up but he refused further treatment. He apparently had a busted nose, bruises on his face and some minor cuts on the back of his head. He did see his own doctor the next day. Witnesses saw them struggling on the ground with one them on top punching. Zimmerman pulled his gun (he claims there was a struggle) and shot Martin as close range.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
When I got the snot kicked out of me, I had sore ribs, 1 black eye, and a fat lip - seems like if we can trust the report from the family doctor Zimmerman got it at least as bad if not worse.May 15: Details emerge from a medical report by Zimmerman's family doctor that show the neighborhood watch volunteer was diagnosed with a fractured nose, two black eyes and two lacerations on the back of the head after his fatal confrontation with Martin.
My bias is for fair justice. I am against the lynch mob screaming murderer, murderer, murderer when there is no evidence out there which suggests it. Maybe we will learn something, but so far the case is non-existent.Yeah, and you're not biased for Zimmerman at all.Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one twoOn what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?
Is it as cut and dry as:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
vs.
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.
If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
And you're missing the 3rd alternative:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.![]()
My bias is for fair justice. I am against the lynch mob screaming murderer, murderer, murderer when there is no evidence out there which suggests it. Maybe we will learn something, but so far the case is non-existent.Yeah, and you're not biased for Zimmerman at all.Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one twoOn what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?
Is it as cut and dry as:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
vs.
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.
If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
And you're missing the 3rd alternative:
Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.![]()

Just reading the (PDF) police report. Reading a witness statement from a woman who claims she saw one person chasing another person approx. 10 to 12 feet apart, towards the T in the sidewalk that connects retreatview with twin trees and a fistfight then a shot. She was in her 2nd fl bedroom window. She couldnt tell who was who.Add this in from the state attorneys office and this witness may be key."He runs after this person. He takes him down, and our contention is that he's the aggressor," said state attorney Bernie De La Ronda.Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.