What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (3 Viewers)

:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
Not really.
That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.
This has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.
Nope
:lmao:
There's nothing smarmy about me laughing at you guys' dumb statements.
no...just really eletist and arrogant as usual. :yucky:
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
Not really.
That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.
I pointed out a lawyer using the press to cash in on his client. I can understand why you don't like that.
Yeah, damn him for trying to get paid for his efforts.
Why would you damn your peer? He's soaking the guy's supporters for all he can get.
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
Not really.
That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.
This has to be the most blatant pot-kettle post ever made.
Nope
:lmao:
There's nothing smarmy about me laughing at you guys' dumb statements.
no...just really eletist and arrogant as usual. :yucky:
Then use the right words.
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice
Not really.
That's right, you just like making smarmy posts.
I pointed out a lawyer using the press to cash in on his client. I can understand why you don't like that.
Yeah, damn him for trying to get paid for his efforts.
Why would you damn your peer? He's soaking the guy's supporters for all he can get.
How is he soaking them?
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.
:lmao: Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?
Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?
Why are you changing the question?
You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.
:lmao: Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?
Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?
Why are you changing the question?
You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.
:lmao:
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.
:lmao: Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?
Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?
Why are you changing the question?
You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.
:lmao:
Classic Christo. Trying to catch up with CH for most dumb post in the thread?
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.
:lmao: Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?
Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?
Why are you changing the question?
You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.
:lmao:
Classic Christo. Trying to catch up with CH for most dumb post in the thread?
Seriously, I think English is a second language for several of you.
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.
:lmao: Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?
Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?
Why are you changing the question?
You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.
Christo did not put any words in anyone's mouth. When you call someone a murderer you are labeling them as guilty.
 
:lmao: So now the lemmings are against a citizen being able to employ the lawyer of his choice to defend him against criminal charges brought by the government that if proven could send him to prison for the majority of his life.
No, the lemmings are still giving money to a murderer.
:lmao: Yeah, all those lemmings who believe a man is innocent until proven guilty.
It would seem to me that the $1,000,000 is on George. Verdict is in on that; so why are these lemmings contributing still?
Bail is a right. It's part of the process. The judge admitted as much. Why shouldn't he be able to exercise all of the rights we have as citizens?
Why are you changing the question?
You changed it. Christo made a statement about Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty, you asked a question in response implying somehow $1,000,000 bail proves Zimmerman's guilt. Christo corrected the implication of your question. Bail is a right, it has nothing to do with establishing any sort of guilt.
Bull####. Christo is putting words in people's mouths and formulating counter positions to arguments nobody is making. Par for the course.
Christo did not put any words in anyone's mouth. When you call someone a murderer you are labeling them as guilty.
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Yet.
:lmao:
Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Yet.
:lmao:
Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.
Of yours? You bet! :thumbup:

 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Yet.
:lmao:
Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.
Of yours? You bet! :thumbup:
:lmao:
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Yet.
:lmao:
Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.
Of yours? You bet! :thumbup:
:lmao:
You're going to have to try a lot harder. Carolina Hustler is lapping you in dumb posts.

 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Yet.
:lmao:
Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.
Of yours? You bet! :thumbup:
:lmao:
You're going to have to try a lot harder. Carolina Hustler is lapping you in dumb posts.
First things first. I've got a lot of work to catch up to you.
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Yet.
:lmao:
Keep going. Might want to go back a few pages, you've been slacking.
I'm sure there have been a lot of laughable posts over the last several pages. But don't fret. I have faith that you guys will hit the "Add Reply" on a lot of dumb posts over the next several months.
Of yours? You bet! :thumbup:
:lmao:
You're going to have to try a lot harder. Carolina Hustler is lapping you in dumb posts.
First things first. I've got a lot of work to catch up to you.
Keep going...

 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
Nah, give him money. He killed a Black kid, he's doing the world a favor.

 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
Nah, give him money. He killed a Black kid, he's doing the world a favor.
You're not going to make this easy, are you?
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.
New here?
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.
the judge sure has zimmy figured out, but what does he know hahahaha. You seem to know more than the people directly involved in this case. Zimmy`s story has been shown to be full of holes and inconsistencies since it was made public...get with the program bro.
 
Irony of the year....Rev. Al Sharpton criticizing Zimmerman for for how he raised money.... :lol:
what a country we live in when a man can shoot an unarmed teen and get rich afterwards by gun loving zealots throwing money at him :loco:
The greatest country on earth. One which allows one to protect himself. :thumbup:
yup...by bringing a gun to a fistfight...how clever and brave
I would rather be Zimmerman than Martin. Just sayin'.
 
Yep. Guilty of Murder. And Perjury, apparently.
Hasn't been charged with perjury and there is a trial which will establish if he is a murderer. Lots of people here want to bypass the legal system.
Nobody wants to bypass the legat system. If he's acquitted, so be it. But what's truly astonishing, Jon, is that you apparently WANT this guy to be acquitted. For you and some others he has become a conservative cause. And that's truly embarrassing. Just watching this guy a few times should tell you what kind of scum he is, and that he probably did it even though it will be difficult to prove. You're not on the jury; you should be running away from defending this guy .
What is astonishing is people who label him as a murderer when the facts are so much in doubt and there hasn't been a trial. I don't want him to be acquitted, I want him to be treated equally as anybody and not railroaded into court because of media, public, and political pressure. If there was any evidence which suggest this was murder, I would be happy to see him put on trial and convicted. From every shred of evidence out there, this is not the case. You want to call my position astonishing. Come on Tim, it is the idiots in this thread who keep calling him a murderer. That is a factually incorrect statement until it is proven in court. It is astonishing that you side with such erroneous rhetoric which along with all the other false rhetoric in this case will probably fuel riots if this case goes a certain direction.
the judge sure has zimmy figured out, but what does he know hahahaha. You seem to know more than the people directly involved in this case. Zimmy`s story has been shown to be full of holes and inconsistencies since it was made public...get with the program bro.
That is ok. I am not going to get with your lynch mob justice program.
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?

Is it as cut and dry as:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.

vs.

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.

If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.

 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small. And you're missing the 3rd alternative:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small. And you're missing the 3rd alternative:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Neither scenario is that accurate. Zimmerman was following him before the dispatcher said anything to him. After the dispatcher informed Zimmerman that he did not need to follow him, it is not clear what happened, if there was further pursuit or if Martin approached Zimmerman. Zimmerman had wounds cleaned up but he refused further treatment. He apparently had a busted nose, bruises on his face and some minor cuts on the back of his head. He did see his own doctor the next day. Witnesses saw them struggling on the ground with one them on top punching. Zimmerman pulled his gun (he claims there was a struggle) and shot Martin as close range.
 
This is a pretty good timeline:http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/12/justice/florida-zimmerman-timeline/index.htmlthe parts about 7 911 calls all reporting hearing someone screaming for help and the fact that Zimmerman was bleeding from the back of the head leads me to somewhat believe zimmerman's story:

About 7:30 p.m.: Zimmerman tells police he shot Martin in self-defense. In a police report, Officer Timothy Smith writes that Zimmerman is bleeding from the nose and back of the head.
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Neither scenario is that accurate. Zimmerman was following him before the dispatcher said anything to him. After the dispatcher informed Zimmerman that he did not need to follow him, it is not clear what happened, if there was further pursuit or if Martin approached Zimmerman. Zimmerman had wounds cleaned up but he refused further treatment. He apparently had a busted nose, bruises on his face and some minor cuts on the back of his head. He did see his own doctor the next day. Witnesses saw them struggling on the ground with one them on top punching. Zimmerman pulled his gun (he claims there was a struggle) and shot Martin as close range.
Ok. Do people think Zimmerman was doing the punching on top and then decided to shoot him for good measure? Was there any forensic evidence that suggest Zimmerman shot Martin while laying down on his back or while sitting on top of him? Did the bullet exit the body?
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small. And you're missing the 3rd alternative:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.
Murder 2.
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?

Is it as cut and dry as:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.

vs.

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.

If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.

And you're missing the 3rd alternative:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.
Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one two
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?

Is it as cut and dry as:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.

vs.

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.

If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.

And you're missing the 3rd alternative:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.
Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one two
Yeah, and you're not biased for Zimmerman at all. :rolleyes:

 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Neither scenario is that accurate. Zimmerman was following him before the dispatcher said anything to him. After the dispatcher informed Zimmerman that he did not need to follow him, it is not clear what happened, if there was further pursuit or if Martin approached Zimmerman. Zimmerman had wounds cleaned up but he refused further treatment. He apparently had a busted nose, bruises on his face and some minor cuts on the back of his head. He did see his own doctor the next day. Witnesses saw them struggling on the ground with one them on top punching. Zimmerman pulled his gun (he claims there was a struggle) and shot Martin as close range.
Ok. Do people think Zimmerman was doing the punching on top and then decided to shoot him for good measure? Was there any forensic evidence that suggest Zimmerman shot Martin while laying down on his back or while sitting on top of him? Did the bullet exit the body?
The man on top was shot and rolled to the ground, and Zimmerman got up. There is one witness who claims the bigger man was on top, whatever that means. Some spin that as meaning Zimmerman, but that does not fit any of the other facts as we know them. About the only thing i heard from forensics, is that the shot was close range.
 
medical reports:

May 15: Details emerge from a medical report by Zimmerman's family doctor that show the neighborhood watch volunteer was diagnosed with a fractured nose, two black eyes and two lacerations on the back of the head after his fatal confrontation with Martin.
When I got the snot kicked out of me, I had sore ribs, 1 black eye, and a fat lip - seems like if we can trust the report from the family doctor Zimmerman got it at least as bad if not worse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?

Is it as cut and dry as:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.

vs.

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.

If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.

And you're missing the 3rd alternative:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.
Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one two
Yeah, and you're not biased for Zimmerman at all. :rolleyes:
My bias is for fair justice. I am against the lynch mob screaming murderer, murderer, murderer when there is no evidence out there which suggests it. Maybe we will learn something, but so far the case is non-existent.
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case?

Is it as cut and dry as:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.

vs.

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.

If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
He didn't go to the hospital. He had a couple of tiny cuts on his head. If you've ever had a cut on your head, you know how much it bleeds no matter how small.

And you're missing the 3rd alternative:

Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, Zimmerman confronted Martin in an angry manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.
On what part of his head?Your 3rd alternative makes it sound like it was premeditated murder.
Texas is a Martin fanboy, incapable of presenting accurate facts. Anything his says is pure fantasy. Here are photos of Zimmerman's head..... one two
Yeah, and you're not biased for Zimmerman at all. :rolleyes:
My bias is for fair justice. I am against the lynch mob screaming murderer, murderer, murderer when there is no evidence out there which suggests it. Maybe we will learn something, but so far the case is non-existent.
:lmao:
 
Can someone sum up what the two positions are in this case? Is it as cut and dry as:Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry non-violent manner which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him.vs.Zimmerman saw a suspicious person in his neighborhood, called the police, they advised him not to follow, he followed him, the youth confronted him in an angry violent manner by assaulting him, pounding his head against the sidewalk which lead to Zimmerman to fatally shoot him in self-defense.If so did he receive medical treatment at a hospital the same night and have those details been released? I know when I was assaulted I was a bloody mess and the hospital report itself stated: assault/trauma.
Just reading the (PDF) police report. Reading a witness statement from a woman who claims she saw one person chasing another person approx. 10 to 12 feet apart, towards the T in the sidewalk that connects retreatview with twin trees and a fistfight then a shot. She was in her 2nd fl bedroom window. She couldnt tell who was who.Add this in from the state attorneys office and this witness may be key."He runs after this person. He takes him down, and our contention is that he's the aggressor," said state attorney Bernie De La Ronda.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top