What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Flu Makes a Comeback After an Unusual Season Off (1 Viewer)

Last edited by a moderator:
Do you think doctors were influenced by the election as far as diagnosis of the flu?

Or perhaps a ton of kids virtual, people making and distancing, less travel, movies closed and so on…do you think that had something to do with it?  Also more vaccinated for the flu than before also a rise this year I believe)

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccine-supply-historical.htm

Not everything is political.
Possibly but not for the flu to completely disappear for a year. And if these measures were all we needed, why didn't we ever try them before? Why are they not working this year?

 
Possibly but not for the flu to completely disappear for a year. And if these measures were all we needed, why didn't we ever try them before? Why are they not working this year?
Because people aren’t masking as much, going out more, schools in session in person, less distancing…movies and concerts and sporting events with fans?  Less work from home more back jn an office setting.

Probably why alot is not working quite the same…because peoples aren’t acting the same.

 
Do you think doctors were influenced by the election as far as diagnosis of the flu?

Or perhaps a ton of kids virtual, people making and distancing, less travel, movies closed and so on…do you think that had something to do with it?  Also more vaccinated for the flu than before also a rise this year I believe)

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccine-supply-historical.htm

Not everything is political.
Flu definitely decreased due to all of the precautions taken for COVID (social distancing, less mass gatherings, wearing masks, etc.)

To say otherwise is just silly and plain wrong.

 
Possibly but not for the flu to completely disappear for a year. And if these measures were all we needed, why didn't we ever try them before? Why are they not working this year?
Things opened up more. Less people wearing masks. Stuff like that.

 
ITs right in the link:

Last year's flu season was the lowest on record, likely because COVID-19 measures — school closures, distancing, masks and canceled travel — prevented the spread of influenza, or because the coronavirus somehow pushed aside other viruses.

Let's not make this yet another conspiracy.

:tinfoilhat:

 
My son got put down hard by Flu A for a week plus. We thought it was Covid but that came back negative, flu positive. 


My daughter too.  3 negative covid tests.  Been sick for a week.  Dr. didn't have any flu tests left yesterday.  Treating it like the flu.

 
ITs right in the link:

Last year's flu season was the lowest on record, likely because COVID-19 measures — school closures, distancing, masks and canceled travel — prevented the spread of influenza, or because the coronavirus somehow pushed aside other viruses.

Let's not make this yet another conspiracy.

:tinfoilhat:
Yep. We were all locked away. This seems obvious.

 
Yep. We were all locked away. This seems obvious.
It was even commented on last year about it being one of the side benefits of masking and social distancing. It's no surprise the number of flu cases is returning to normal now that most of the restrictions have been lifted or ignored.

 
ITs right in the link:

Last year's flu season was the lowest on record, likely because COVID-19 measures — school closures, distancing, masks and canceled travel — prevented the spread of influenza, or because the coronavirus somehow pushed aside other viruses.

Let's not make this yet another conspiracy.

:tinfoilhat:
My kids were in school last year during the winter. Most were around the country. Some places were remote sure. Plus not everyone wore masks or at least that's what people told us for why the virus continued to spread. 

I think that's an easy reason that most people will buy but for the flu to just disappear for an entire year during "the worst pandemic in human history" seems a bit shortsighted. Why did the masks and social distancing completely eliminate the flu but not Covid? Why didn't we ever use these methods before if they were so effective? Why are we not doing them again for the flu if they were so effective? If they clearly worked why aren't politicians screaming from the mountain tops at the absolute win their lockdowns had?

People accept a reason presented to them because they don't want to believe the alternative. 

 
It was even commented on last year about it being one of the side benefits of masking and social distancing. It's no surprise the number of flu cases is returning to normal now that most of the restrictions have been lifted or ignored.
You can't reconcile the disappearance of flu numbers with the explosion of covid numbers at the exact same time.  Either social distancing works or it doesn't.  HTH. 

 
ITs right in the link:

Last year's flu season was the lowest on record, likely because COVID-19 measures — school closures, distancing, masks and canceled travel — prevented the spread of influenza, or because the coronavirus somehow pushed aside other viruses.

Let's not make this yet another conspiracy.

:tinfoilhat:
I guess if you are in the sizable part of the populace that do not believe these COVID measures work you also need some alternate theory to explain the flu

 
My kids were in school last year during the winter. Most were around the country. Some places were remote sure. Plus not everyone wore masks or at least that's what people told us for why the virus continued to spread. 

I think that's an easy reason that most people will buy but for the flu to just disappear for an entire year during "the worst pandemic in human history" seems a bit shortsighted. Why did the masks and social distancing completely eliminate the flu but not Covid? Why didn't we ever use these methods before if they were so effective? Why are we not doing them again for the flu if they were so effective? If they clearly worked why aren't politicians screaming from the mountain tops at the absolute win their lockdowns had?

People accept a reason presented to them because they don't want to believe the alternative. 
Because...you see how well these measures went over during a pandemic so you have to think any sort of societal acceptance for the implementation of those mitigation measures would be non-existent for the regular flu season. Never happen cuz people are naturally selfish, imo.

 
Because...you see how well these measures went over during a pandemic so you have to think any sort of societal acceptance for the implementation of those mitigation measures would be non-existent for the regular flu season. Never happen cuz people are naturally selfish, imo.
So we did the measures or we didn't do the measures? I'm confused.

 
"The final national data on flu season is released annually in April by the CDC .

Between October 1, 2019 and April 4, 2020, the flu resulted in:

39 to 56 million illnesses

410,000 to 740,000 hospitalizations

24,000 to 62,000 deaths

195 pediatric deaths

Between October 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021, the flu resulted in:

1,675 illnesses

224 hospitalizations

Unknown number of deaths

One pediatric death"

https://hive.rochesterregional.org/2021/11/flu-season-2021

 
Covid seemed to spread perfectly fine last year. Why didn't the flu?
Transmission

The speed of transmission is a major point of difference between the two viruses. In general, the flu has a shorter incubation period (the time from infection to appearance of symptoms) with an average of 2 days. Recent research shows that COVID-19, however, has an incubation period of around 5 days but can be anywhere from 1-14 days.

According to data from China, experts estimate that each person infected with the novel coronavirus infects between 2-3 others, which is twice as high as the seasonal flu. It’s also important for people to keep in mind – especially those who are young and healthy – that the coronavirus can be transmitted to others even if you are not presenting any symptoms.

https://www.tuftsmedicalcenter.org/news-events-media/news/web/covid-19/covid-19-vs-flu

 
"The final national data on flu season is released annually in April by the CDC .

Between October 1, 2019 and April 4, 2020, the flu resulted in:

39 to 56 million illnesses

410,000 to 740,000 hospitalizations

24,000 to 62,000 deaths

195 pediatric deaths

Between October 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021, the flu resulted in:

1,675 illnesses

224 hospitalizations

Unknown number of deaths

One pediatric death"

https://hive.rochesterregional.org/2021/11/flu-season-2021
Those are certainly interesting numbers. Question: Do you think they were faking the test numbers? Or why do you think the positive test percentage was so much lower?

"During September 28, 2020–May 22, 2021 in the United States, 1,675 (0.2%) of 818,939 respiratory specimens tested by U.S. clinical laboratories were positive for an influenza virus. The low level of flu activity during this past season contributed to dramatically fewer flu illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths compared with previous flu seasons. For comparison, during the last three seasons before the pandemic, the proportion of respiratory specimens testing positive for influenza peaked between 26.2% and 30.3%."

 
Also. I don't think those are apples to apples comparisons. Those are estimated illnesses vs actual positive tests. There were certainly more actual cases of the flu last year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Transmission

The speed of transmission is a major point of difference between the two viruses. In general, the flu has a shorter incubation period (the time from infection to appearance of symptoms) with an average of 2 days. Recent research shows that COVID-19, however, has an incubation period of around 5 days but can be anywhere from 1-14 days.

According to data from China, experts estimate that each person infected with the novel coronavirus infects between 2-3 others, which is twice as high as the seasonal flu. It’s also important for people to keep in mind – especially those who are young and healthy – that the coronavirus can be transmitted to others even if you are not presenting any symptoms.

https://www.tuftsmedicalcenter.org/news-events-media/news/web/covid-19/covid-19-vs-flu
Covid transmission "twice as high as the seasonal flu" isn't enough to explain the numbers. -> The complete disappearance of the flu during the same time period that covid cases reached record numbers.  

 
We implemented the measures and they worked to some degree with covid when practiced with vigilance and they were even more effective against the common flu: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/a-sharp-drop-in-flu-cases-during-covid-19-pandemic/
They didn't really work against Covid but if these numbers are to be believed, they all but eliminated the Flu. I would think that would be an incredible argument to implement these measures permanently to eliminate the approx 650k hospitalizations and 50k deaths a year people suffer from the flu. If it saves one life and stops hospitals from being overwhelmed right? Why are our leaders not shouting this from on high? 

 
They didn't really work against Covid but if these numbers are to be believed, they all but eliminated the Flu. I would think that would be an incredible argument to implement these measures permanently to eliminate the approx 650k hospitalizations and 50k deaths a year people suffer from the flu. If it saves one life and stops hospitals from being overwhelmed right? Why are our leaders not shouting this from on high? 
Because a third of the country will not comply and many of them compare these measures to Nazi Germany. Government leaders are still recommending masking and social distancing. People won't take these measures for something much more deadly so why are they going to do it for a measly 50k lives?

 
Because a third of the country will not comply and many of them compare these measures to Nazi Germany. Government leaders are still recommending masking and social distancing. People won't take these measures for something much more deadly so why are they going to do it for a measly 50k lives?
They wouldn't do it for Covid because it was having no affect. If they showed these incredible numbers of the flu, people might consider it. After all everyone was following the procedures the whole time and the flu went away completely. 

 
They didn't really work against Covid but if these numbers are to be believed, they all but eliminated the Flu. I would think that would be an incredible argument to implement these measures permanently to eliminate the approx 650k hospitalizations and 50k deaths a year people suffer from the flu. If it saves one life and stops hospitals from being overwhelmed right? Why are our leaders not shouting this from on high? 
Good luck tilting at the windmills. I'll let you persuade Tonydead to wear a mask against the flu after which I will support your call for elected leaders to mandate the same.

 
They wouldn't do it for Covid because it was having no affect. If they showed these incredible numbers of the flu, people might consider it. After all everyone was following the procedures the whole time and the flu went away completely. 
The assertions that it was having no effect and that everyone was following the mitigation procedures are both false

 
The assertions that it was having no effect and that everyone was following the mitigation procedures are both false
So not all the people were following the procedures but the flu disappeared.

And Covid was affected by the people following the procedures but have more cases and deaths this year than last with vaccines. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top