What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game of Thrones, tv only, books don't exist, no backstory...NERDS already ruining a series that hasn't started (6 Viewers)

They were Kingsguard.  That dude was Sir Arthur Dayne.......regarded as like the Tom Brady of Kingsguard.

When I was reading the books....I thought it weird that Rheagar sent three of his top boys to guard some poo-pooed out ##### that he kidnapped and banged. 
The Kingsguard are supposed to guard the King, or the prince (Rhaegar). There are a few subtle hints in the dialogue of the Tower of Joy scene, essentially hinting that the Kingsguard were in fact there to guard the eldest son of the eldest son of the king.

 
Yes. The whole point of his big finale is to show 2 things. 1. R+L=J Who is parents are.  2. Bran knows.  So there's no need for Sam to figure it out or anyone else. Bran has the information. 

The only reason we need Sam is to show the best looking teeth on the show!
Who's going to believe him, a cripple kid who talked to a tree?  Yeah, that guy who's my half brother is really my cousin, and thus the king. 

 
He knows who the mother was, but may not know the father - unless Ned told him. 
I think the presumption is that Ned brought the kid back to Winterfell - Reed, at a minimum would know the mother - and the entire war was fought because people assumed Rhaegar kidnapped Lyana - so it would not be a stretch to figure out the father.

The real issue is whether its Jon Targaryen, or Jon Waters...

 
Who's going to believe him, a cripple kid who talked to a tree?  Yeah, that guy who's my half brother is really my cousin, and thus the king. 
He's becoming much more that just a cripple kid.

Bloodlines not really mattering much. Sit the throne by power. We've already seen that an unacknowledged ******* (Gendry, Ramsay) isn't in line for anything. 

Jojen also forecasted Winterfell to be underwater in the magazine, so there's that to possibly look forward to as well. My guess is that we need to remember a powerful winter is here so everything is going to be cold and piled mountains high of snow. I think some melting (via dragon?) could cause some flooding.

 
I think the presumption is that Ned brought the kid back to Winterfell - Reed, at a minimum would know the mother - and the entire war was fought because people assumed Rhaegar kidnapped Lyana - so it would not be a stretch to figure out the father.

The real issue is whether its Jon Targaryen, or Jon Waters...
Didn't realize that would be the last name (so like Snow, just for an area south).  Reed would also realize it just for the fact that the Kingsguard were there, right?  They wouldn't be there just to protect Lyanna alone, especially during a rebellion. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's becoming much more that just a cripple kid.

Bloodlines not really mattering much. Sit the throne by power. We've already seen that an unacknowledged ******* (Gendry, Ramsay) isn't in line for anything. 

Jojen also forecasted Winterfell to be underwater in the magazine, so there's that to possibly look forward to as well. My guess is that we need to remember a powerful winter is here so everything is going to be cold and piled mountains high of snow. I think some melting (via dragon?) could cause some flooding.
magazines don't exist.

 
I think many assume that Littlefinger and/or Varys know this stuff too.  

Don't know why/how there would be official document of this at the Citadel for Sam to discover though.  

 
He's becoming much more that just a cripple kid.

Bloodlines not really mattering much. Sit the throne by power. We've already seen that an unacknowledged ******* (Gendry, Ramsay) isn't in line for anything. 

Jojen also forecasted Winterfell to be underwater in the magazine, so there's that to possibly look forward to as well. My guess is that we need to remember a powerful winter is here so everything is going to be cold and piled mountains high of snow. I think some melting (via dragon?) could cause some flooding.
This has already happened - it was the Ironborn taking over Winterfell.

 
KarmaPolice said:
I think many assume that Littlefinger and/or Varys know this stuff too.  

Don't know why/how there would be official document of this at the Citadel for Sam to discover though.  
IF Rheagar married Lysanna I'd imagine there has to be some sort of record on it....at least to give him legitimacy.*

* But that's if legitimacy matters in a post White Walker World. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IF Rheagar married Lysanna I'd imagine there has to be some sort of record on it....at least to give him legitimacy.*

* But that's if legitimacy matters in a post White Walker World. 
I  think legitimacy is long gone in the seven kingdoms. Who ever takes it is the ruler.

 
Jojen also forecasted Winterfell to be underwater in the magazine
I know folks said this already happened with the Ironborn - and just spit-balling here from what I learned on the last page....but could that be more figurative than literal?  If Jon Snow is actually Jon Water, and he took back Winterfell with the BoB, wouldn't it be under Water's rule?

Also, I've been rewatching season 6 this past week, and I caught something, which may have just been editing.  In the episode where the Hound comes back, there was no "intro" into the show (the spinning sun ball and the camera going all over the map of Westeros and Essos).  Mean anything or was that just cut out from the feed I was watching (via free GoT this week with Comcast)?

 
Put me in the camp that Jamie eventually kills Cersai. She basically did what Jamie killed the Mad King for wanting to do. Lighting up the city with wild fire.

 
I know folks said this already happened with the Ironborn - and just spit-balling here from what I learned on the last page....but could that be more figurative than literal?  If Jon Snow is actually Jon Water, and he took back Winterfell with the BoB, wouldn't it be under Water's rule?

Also, I've been rewatching season 6 this past week, and I caught something, which may have just been editing.  In the episode where the Hound comes back, there was no "intro" into the show (the spinning sun ball and the camera going all over the map of Westeros and Essos).  Mean anything or was that just cut out from the feed I was watching (via free GoT this week with Comcast)?
Technically he is already in charge of Winterfell - they beat the Boltons, and then the Northern Houses declared Jon to be King o'the North

 
Put me in the camp that Jamie eventually kills Cersai. She basically did what Jamie killed the Mad King for wanting to do. Lighting up the city with wild fire.
didn't she basically just blow up one big building/block of the city? Jamie's reaction will be interesting regardless!

 
Technically he is already in charge of Winterfell - they beat the Boltons, and then the Northern Houses declared Jon to be King o'the North
Right.  When was Jojen's forecast again?  Wasn't it when Jon wasn't in charge of Winterfell, or am I thinking of something else?

 
Arrrggghhhh, I'm behind. I was cruising along and all set to have season finished by the start of 7, but I lost an episode last night because I had to edit pics for a client and tonight I have some work to do. No way I get through them all before the 16th.  :rant:

 
Put me in the camp that Jamie eventually kills Cersai. She basically did what Jamie killed the Mad King for wanting to do. Lighting up the city with wild fire.
The further into the story we get, does anyone feel at this point Jamie pushing Bran out of the window was completely out of character?  I kinda wish now that Cersei pushed him and Jamie just took the blame for it when captured later on. 

I thought we were getting a redemption story, but if you look at it as a whole, he didn't really do anything wrong at any point except the Bran shove. Well, also banging sis, but I'm talking about killing innocents type stuff. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The further into the story we get, does anyone feel at this point Jamie pushing Bran out of the window was completely out of character?  I kinda wish now that Cersei pushed him and Jamie just took the blame for it when captured later on. 
It wasn't out of character.  He killed a lannister boy who was all excited to have squired for him a decade ago because he needed a diversion to get out of his cell.  He also wanted brien to kill the random farmer they saw when she was walking him to kings landing because who knows, they might recognize him. Why wouldn't he kill a stark boy who could have revealed a secret that could take down his family's claim to the throne? 

 
The further into the story we get, does anyone feel at this point Jamie pushing Bran out of the window was completely out of character?  I kinda wish now that Cersei pushed him and Jamie just took the blame for it when captured later on. 

I thought we were getting a redemption story, but if you look at it as a whole, he didn't really do anything wrong at any point except the Bran shove. Well, also banging sis, but I'm talking about killing innocents type stuff. 
A little out of character, but not much.

For one, Jamie has grown through the story and isn't the same person he was several years ago.  Two other big reasons though:

  • He was deeply in love with Cersei and would have done anything, even things contrary to his nature to keep and continue that relationship.
  • If Robert would have found out about him and Cersei he would have eventually figured out the kids weren't his, and Robert wasn't beyond killing kids.
So he had a lot to protect in that instant.

 
The further into the story we get, does anyone feel at this point Jamie pushing Bran out of the window was completely out of character?  I kinda wish now that Cersei pushed him and Jamie just took the blame for it when captured later on.

I thought we were getting a redemption story, but if you look at it as a whole, he didn't really do anything wrong at any point except the Bran shove. Well, also banging sis, but I'm talking about killing innocents type stuff. 
As discussed above, it wasn't very much out of character.  He did it to protect her. 

 
The further into the story we get, does anyone feel at this point Jamie pushing Bran out of the window was completely out of character?  I kinda wish now that Cersei pushed him and Jamie just took the blame for it when captured later on.

I thought we were getting a redemption story, but if you look at it as a whole, he didn't really do anything wrong at any point except the Bran shove. Well, also banging sis, but I'm talking about killing innocents type stuff. 
No I think it was completely in character for him at the time. He thought his #### didn't stink and was above the law. He's since been knocked down a few pegs and has a change of character. Prior to the losses he suffered in the war he was pretty much an undefeated, golden spoon, didn't care a lick about peasants kinda guy. Since, he's been humbled, lost his sword hand, gotten the #### beaten out of him by Bronn trying to re-learn swordplay and been essentially booted to the curb by probably the only person he every truly loved, Cersei. That tends to give one a different perspective and rather than continue on with his hoity toity attitude he is changing as he begins to see the world through a different set of eyes.

I also think that he is beginning to see how right Tyrion has always been about his family.

 
Yeah, I think we have just gotten so used the the Jamie we have now, and forget what an ### he could be back in the day - especially doing what he needs to do to protect his family. 

 
A little out of character, but not much.

For one, Jamie has grown through the story and isn't the same person he was several years ago.  Two other big reasons though:

  • He was deeply in love with Cersei and would have done anything, even things contrary to his nature to keep and continue that relationship.
  • If Robert would have found out about him and Cersei he would have eventually figured out the kids weren't his, and Robert wasn't beyond killing kids.
So he had a lot to protect in that instant.
And I'm not real sure Jamie ever gave a #### about the kids. He was solely focused on Cersei but I've never gotten the feeling that he cared a bit about the kids.

 
And I'm not real sure Jamie ever gave a #### about the kids. He was solely focused on Cersei but I've never gotten the feeling that he cared a bit about the kids.
I think he did moreso as his character changed. I thought there were a couple of scenes were he was legitimately trying to be fatherly with Tommen ( I think when Joffery was laid out in the church). 

 
I think he did moreso as his character changed. I thought there were a couple of scenes were he was legitimately trying to be fatherly with Tommen ( I think when Joffery was laid out in the church). 
When Joffrey was laid out, Jamie banged his sister on the floor next to him. Now that kind of behavior doesn't appeal much to me but I'm not exactly sure what kind of conclusions I should draw about his character from that incident.

 
When Joffrey was laid out, Jamie banged his sister on the floor next to him. Now that kind of behavior doesn't appeal much to me but I'm not exactly sure what kind of conclusions I should draw about his character from that incident.
LOL!.... Funerals and sex.  Goes together like bullets and guns.

I do think prior to the Porking In The Sept...he showed real concern for Tommen (an Uncle needs to be there for his nephew....I think he said). 

 
And I'm not real sure Jamie ever gave a #### about the kids. He was solely focused on Cersei but I've never gotten the feeling that he cared a bit about the kids.
I'm sure its tricky being fatherly when you can't let anyone know (even the kids) that you're the dad.

 
Be careful reading any theories that may be out there.  Full, detailed spoilers are out for season 7 and people may be trying to make themselves look smart by posting the spoilers as their theory.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL!.... Funerals and sex.  Goes together like bullets and guns.

I do think prior to the Porking In The Sept...he showed real concern for Tommen (an Uncle needs to be there for his nephew....I think he said). 
He also went out on a fairly dangerous limb for the daughter whose name I can't spell but whose delectable young rack I was entranced by. And was very gentle with her during their brief time together on the ship.

 
Read it on my phone a few days ago, then watched episode 8, season 6 last night (No One).  Really the theory is that Jaqen has actually been Ned since they met way back in season 1 (maybe season 2).  I'd forgotten Jaqen went that far back in the story. 
Yeah, this is the trouble when you introduce stuff like shapeshifters and people who can change faces into a story.  Now even when they are dead, they might not be dead.  (Combined that with them playing that card a bit more as the series went with characters like Jon and The Hound).

 
Yeah, this is the trouble when you introduce stuff like shapeshifters and people who can change faces into a story.  Now even when they are dead, they might not be dead.  (Combined that with them playing that card a bit more as the series went with characters like Jon and The Hound).
Jon, definitely. Did anyone think the Hound was dead, though?  You never saw a body, I just assumed alive. 

 
Jon, definitely. Did anyone think the Hound was dead, though?  You never saw a body, I just assumed alive. 
Fair point.  Just something that I noticed as the story went on in both formats - it went from feeling like nobody is safe and everybody is dying to getting these off-screen deaths, Frankenstein monsters,  and resurrections so the deaths didn't feel as final. 

 
Read it on my phone a few days ago, then watched episode 8, season 6 last night (No One).  Really the theory is that Jaqen has actually been Ned since they met way back in season 1 (maybe season 2).  I'd forgotten Jaqen went that far back in the story. 
Versions of that theory have been around for a long time, most commonly repeated part is that Syrio is alive and is actually Jaquen.

Pretty sure Martin and the show runners have debunked this multiple times but it keeps coming up.

I would argue that the theory doesn't fit Ned's character at all, he was honorable to a fault which is what got him killed.

Ned's dead baby, Ned's dead.

 
I know folks said this already happened with the Ironborn - and just spit-balling here from what I learned on the last page....but could that be more figurative than literal?  If Jon Snow is actually Jon Water, and he took back Winterfell with the BoB, wouldn't it be under Water's rule?

Also, I've been rewatching season 6 this past week, and I caught something, which may have just been editing.  In the episode where the Hound comes back, there was no "intro" into the show (the spinning sun ball and the camera going all over the map of Westeros and Essos).  Mean anything or was that just cut out from the feed I was watching (via free GoT this week with Comcast)?
Could've been your feed. I watched that episode last night (DirecTV HBO on demand). The intro was right after the Hound drops the log he was carrying solo and turns to the camera.

 
Versions of that theory have been around for a long time, most commonly repeated part is that Syrio is alive and is actually Jaquen.

Pretty sure Martin and the show runners have debunked this multiple times but it keeps coming up.


I would argue that the theory doesn't fit Ned's character at all, he was honorable to a fault which is what got him killed.

Ned's dead baby, Ned's dead.
Yeah, my theory is that Jaqen was working for Littlefinger at the time. Pretty sure I have posted that on this board somewhere.

 
Could've been your feed. I watched that episode last night (DirecTV HBO on demand). The intro was right after the Hound drops the log he was carrying solo and turns to the camera.
I read at some point that the very first episode and that episode were the only two that started with a cold open. Every other episode started with the credits. 

-

I heard an interview it was done that way because they couldn't have Rory McCann's name in the intro and give a surprise reappearance. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top