Andy Hicks
Footballguy
Go for it
I believe they showed a graphic saying that Philly cut their yards per game against ave from 131 to 86 in week 9 after Trotter moved to MLB. I think they will give ATL a rough time on the rush. Plus Vick is not a great passer so they can concentrate on containing him and let the DBs play man to man.Vick is not the best player, most athletic maybe. Not the best, esp at QB.Atlanta's top-ranked run offense v. Philly's middle of the pack run D
You put a lot of work into an obvious outcometheir points scored & allowed.
----------
Falcons (16th offense, 13th defense) 16+13 = 29
Eagles (7th offense, 1st defense) 7+1 = 8
Translation: The Falcons won 11 games with smoke and mirrors. The Eagles are legit.
Offensive/Defensive Efficienies:
-----------
O:Falcons 4992 yards, 314 points = 15.90
D:Falcons 4954 yards, 309 points = 16.03
O:Eagles 5398 yards, 376 points = 14.36
D:Eagles 4807 yards, 222 points = 21.65
*includes week 17
Translation: The Eagles are better on both sides of the ball. Teams that are more efficient than their opponent on both sides of the ball in conference title games are 10-2 and in the super bowl they are 7-0 since 1990. 17-2. The two losses are the 98 Vikings to the Falcons, and the 03 Eagles to the Panthers. One can make the case that since the Eagles were in fact one of those two chokers, I should discount this. But I won't.
----------
Ints-Ints Thrown
----------
Falcons 18-15 = +3
Eagles 17-8 = +11
Eagles hold an edge here as well.
Pick: Eagles
Sometimes its obvious. Sometimes not.You put a lot of work into an obvious outcome![]()
I don't think so, Westbrook keeps his quickness at the Linc why can't Vick or DunnOutside on a field that negates quickness,
I don't think that quickness was a factor in today's game, it was the way that they used Westbrook. He didn't break anything due to his quickness that I recall...I think that familiarity playing in the elements makes a huge difference this time of year. Dome teams just don't do well in the playoffs when they're not at home...I don't think so, Westbrook keeps his quickness at the Linc why can't Vick or DunnOutside on a field that negates quickness,
The only number that matters is points allowed. Philly tied for 2nd and that's only because they didn't play their starters in week 17 and allowed 38 points.Atlanta's top-ranked run offense v. Philly's middle of the pack run D
Vick may be the best player in the league. He will certainly be the best player on the field next weekend.
Or he may not even be top 20.Vick may be the best player in the league.
I like the stat. I'll be pulling for the Birds and Pats here.Both conferences feature the top 2 seeds in their title games. This has occured 5 previous times in the past 14 seasons:1990, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2002Both home teams one only once - in 1991. The Bills beat the Broncos 10-7, and the Redskins beat the Lions 41-10.The #1 seeds in each conference have met in the super bowl only twice in the last 14 years - 1991 and 1993. The Bills lost both - to the Redskins 37-24 and then to the Cowboys 30-13.
We'll all be pulling for the birds in this game, one way or anotherI'll be pulling for the Birds and Pats here.
Eagles are favored by 5.If it goes to 5.5, I like the Falcons.Anyone know what the early spread for this game is??? I would say the Eagles have to be close to a touchdown favorite, no?? (6?)Here's my take for what its worth. Atlanta has NO passing game, and the Eagles will have lots of 8 or even 9 man fronts, allowing for one-on-ones on the outsides, just daring the falcons to throw. As long as special teams are held in check, the falcons will have a hard time scoring.Eagles, finally, waltz into the Super Bowl. Our country's favorite symbol 27, eagles-wanna-be's 10.
Misleading stat on the run offense. Without Vick running, the Falcons are not a great running team. Philly hasn't given up more than 41 yds to a QB running in years. This is also on grass outdoors.Atlanta's top-ranked run offense v. Philly's middle of the pack run D
They didn't, the Purple Clad Clowns were seeded lower than the Rams...I thought Phi was the higher seed? How did Atl play the worst team in the playoffs?
Fly Eagles Fly
On The Road To Victory!
Fight Eagles Fight
Score A Touchdown 1-2-3!
Hit'em Low
Hit'em High
And Watch Our Eagles Fly!
Fly Eagles Fly
On The Road To Victory!
E-A-G-L-E-S-Eagles!
I agree, if things were different, they'd be different.Misleading stat on the run offense. Without Vick running, the Falcons are not a great running team.Atlanta's top-ranked run offense v. Philly's middle of the pack run D
Do you think the Eagles would have had the 7th ranked scoring offense without TO?their points scored & allowed.----------Falcons (16th offense, 13th defense) 16+13 = 29Eagles (7th offense, 1st defense) 7+1 = 8Translation: The Falcons won 11 games with smoke and mirrors. The Eagles are legit.Offensive/Defensive Efficienies:-----------O:Falcons 4992 yards, 314 points = 15.90D:Falcons 4954 yards, 309 points = 16.03O:Eagles 5398 yards, 376 points = 14.36D:Eagles 4807 yards, 222 points = 21.65
They didn't, the Purple Clad Clowns were seeded lower than the Rams...I thought Phi was the higher seed? How did Atl play the worst team in the playoffs?
Did you see Roderick Hood covering Moss? He isnt a shabby corner.Im more worried about Alge vs Phi LB core. The only good matchuo with Crumpler I see is against SS M Lewis.Finneran or Michael Jenkins play a bigger role in this game... I know it sounds retahded, but big WR#2/3 typically do well against the EAGLES, Vick will definitely be able to exploit this matchup a FEW times by buying time in the backfield...
Wrong.Here's what the Packers did:A.Green 11 37 3.4 10 0T.Fisher 2 10 5.0 5 0N.Davenport 4 4 1.0 7 0D.Driver 1 -1 -1.0 -1 0 Total 18 50 2.8 10 0Here are Portis' numbers twice:C.Portis 17 37 2.2 13 0C.Portis 23 80 3.5 13 2I know the rebuttal about Portis will be that the Skins have a non-existant passing game. But the Falcons is just as non-existant (82 yards against the Rams??).People who discount the Eagles run defense simply have not watch the Eagles play the second half of the season (minus the games after home-field advantage was clinched). It's a strength now.Eagles "new run D" hasn't been challenged since getting run over by Pittsburgh.. they playin the NFC least, remember? we'll see how they handle a pretty good Falcons running game..
NFC teams are weak.. I am talking real power running games- Steelers, Pats, Chiefs.. Packers was a nice win, but that was it..Not saying the Falcons will win, but they are the best team the Eagles have faced since the Steelers wuppin...Wrong.Here's what the Packers did:A.Green 11 37 3.4 10 0T.Fisher 2 10 5.0 5 0N.Davenport 4 4 1.0 7 0D.Driver 1 -1 -1.0 -1 0 Total 18 50 2.8 10 0Here are Portis' numbers twice:C.Portis 17 37 2.2 13 0C.Portis 23 80 3.5 13 2I know the rebuttal about Portis will be that the Skins have a non-existant passing game. But the Falcons is just as non-existant (82 yards against the Rams??).People who discount the Eagles run defense simply have not watch the Eagles play the second half of the season (minus the games after home-field advantage was clinched). It's a strength now.Eagles "new run D" hasn't been challenged since getting run over by Pittsburgh.. they playin the NFC least, remember? we'll see how they handle a pretty good Falcons running game..
:rotflmao: And you are excited about the Eagles beating a bad Minny team. Neither the Rams or the Vikings are good teams but the way the Falcons dominated the Rams was much more impressive than the way Philly beat Minny.All of you Falcon fans are getting a little too excited about beating a REAL BAD Rams team. Did anyone see what the Eagles did to Culpepper? He was lost and confused all day. Poor Mike Vick won't know what to do next Sunday. Add in Jevon Kearse shadowing him all day, and the Falcons won't put up more than 13 points. Eagles 27Atl 10
No. How you want to factor that in is up to you. I'm actually not giving it too much weight because I think the Eagles are that much better than the Falcons. They should blow them out.Do you think the Eagles would have had the 7th ranked scoring offense without TO?their points scored & allowed.
----------
Falcons (16th offense, 13th defense) 16+13 = 29
Eagles (7th offense, 1st defense) 7+1 = 8
Translation: The Falcons won 11 games with smoke and mirrors. The Eagles are legit.
Offensive/Defensive Efficienies:
-----------
O:Falcons 4992 yards, 314 points = 15.90
D:Falcons 4954 yards, 309 points = 16.03
O:Eagles 5398 yards, 376 points = 14.36
D:Eagles 4807 yards, 222 points = 21.65
You can't factor it in. The point is that those stats which you say tell the whole story are skewed so you can't put faith in them. Your thinking that the Eagles are a much better team then is a feeling and has no basis in statistics, so no point spewing on about stats. Others on this board obviously have different feelings.No. How you want to factor that in is up to you. I'm actually not giving it too much weight because I think the Eagles are that much better than the Falcons. They should blow them out.Do you think the Eagles would have had the 7th ranked scoring offense without TO?their points scored & allowed.
----------
Falcons (16th offense, 13th defense) 16+13 = 29
Eagles (7th offense, 1st defense) 7+1 = 8
Translation: The Falcons won 11 games with smoke and mirrors. The Eagles are legit.
Offensive/Defensive Efficienies:
-----------
O:Falcons 4992 yards, 314 points = 15.90
D:Falcons 4954 yards, 309 points = 16.03
O:Eagles 5398 yards, 376 points = 14.36
D:Eagles 4807 yards, 222 points = 21.65