What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W10 - Cincinnati V Pittsburgh (1 Viewer)

I wouldn't be surprised if this game becomes a shootout.

Palmer is playing very well. Much will depend if Coles can actually hang on to the ball.

Cinci corners need a few picks for the Bengals to win, I think.

 
Steelers 27-17. I hate to seem like I'm selling Cincy right short as they've beaten my Ravens twice already, but Ben's playing out of his mind right now.

 
Granted, it probably wasnt going to make much of a difference, but why was tha play blown dead so quickly? If that was Roethlisberger, there is no way they blow it dead like that.

 
Isn't that like 6 or 7 games in a row they've given up a special teams or defensive TD?
Yup. 7.Wk 3: TD Johnathan Joseph, 30 Yd interception return, 13:35.Wk 4: TD Jacob Hester, 41 Yd fumble return (Nate Kaeding kick is good), 12:37.Wk 5: TD William James, 38 Yd interception return (Jason Hanson kick is good), 6:52.Wk 6: TD Josh Cribbs, 98 Yd kick return (Billy Cundiff kick is good), 4:15.Wk 7: TD Percy Harvin, 88 Yd kick return (Ryan Longwell kick is good), 6:09.Wk 9: TD Robert Ayers, 54 Yd fumble return (Matt Prater kick is good), 11:16.Wk 10: TD Bernard Scott, 96 Yd kick return (Kevin Huber 2 Pt. Conversion pass to failed), 4:26.
 
So are you saying you think he had 2 feet in?
In all fairness the two feet in was REALLY tough to spot. The reason it wasn't challenged is nobody knew if it was right or wrong.The spot on the ball should have been an easy deal, and didn't require Marv even talking to anyone to throw the flag.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So are you saying you think he had 2 feet in?
In all fairness the two feet in was REALLY tough to spot. The reason it wasn't challenged is nobody knew if it was right or wrong.The spot on the ball should have been an easy deal, and didn't require Marv even talking to anyone to throw the flag.
The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
 
The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
The replay in HD was pretty conclusive. On the field it looked like a catch, though. At least to me and I could care less who wins this game.The spot on the ball was just a terrible, awful call by the side judge.Comparing the two doesn't win any points in your arguments about officiating. One was an obvious bad call, the other was not.
 
The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
The replay in HD was pretty conclusive. On the field it looked like a catch, though. At least to me and I could care less who wins this game.The spot on the ball was just a terrible, awful call by the side judge.Comparing the two doesn't win any points in your arguments about officiating. One was an obvious bad call, the other was not.
My point was simply that bad calls go both ways. Most people seem to realize that. Except, seemingly, fans of teams who are playing the Steelers.
 
The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
The replay in HD was pretty conclusive. On the field it looked like a catch, though. At least to me and I could care less who wins this game.The spot on the ball was just a terrible, awful call by the side judge.Comparing the two doesn't win any points in your arguments about officiating. One was an obvious bad call, the other was not.
My point was simply that bad calls go both ways. Most people seem to realize that. Except, seemingly, fans of teams who are playing the Steelers.
:confused:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top