Andy Hicks
Footballguy
This thread will be pinned once the game starts
way under. 17-10.Over or under 42?
You got hammered at home last week. Get over it.Thud.
You got hammered at home last week. Get over it.Thud.
You are like the biggest fish ever. 
Don't get used to it.That silenced the crowd
They didn't. They fumbled the snap.Not watching...why did the Bengals go for 2?
I agree...its one or the other. But they clearly give Ben Roethlisbrger a little more leeway for whatever reason.If they want to protect the QB, it needs to be two way street. If they are wrapped up, then call it dead.
Yup. 7.Wk 3: TD Johnathan Joseph, 30 Yd interception return, 13:35.Wk 4: TD Jacob Hester, 41 Yd fumble return (Nate Kaeding kick is good), 12:37.Wk 5: TD William James, 38 Yd interception return (Jason Hanson kick is good), 6:52.Wk 6: TD Josh Cribbs, 98 Yd kick return (Billy Cundiff kick is good), 4:15.Wk 7: TD Percy Harvin, 88 Yd kick return (Ryan Longwell kick is good), 6:09.Wk 9: TD Robert Ayers, 54 Yd fumble return (Matt Prater kick is good), 11:16.Wk 10: TD Bernard Scott, 96 Yd kick return (Kevin Huber 2 Pt. Conversion pass to failed), 4:26.Isn't that like 6 or 7 games in a row they've given up a special teams or defensive TD?
Settle down, Moulder. they fixed it on review.Do the Steelers travel with their own officiating crew like the Harlem Globetrotters? Jesh. Horrible spot
You mean like the catch they gave the Bengals earlier that clearly wasn't 2 feet in?Do the Steelers travel with their own officiating crew like the Harlem Globetrotters? Jesh. Horrible spot
Just curious - Caldwell having a decent return year, but is the reason Scott is doing kickoffs now because Andre is more involved with the offense with Henry out?WOW Bernard Scott looks like a bright future ahead.
You mean like the catch they gave the Bengals earlier that clearly wasn't 2 feet in?Do the Steelers travel with their own officiating crew like the Harlem Globetrotters? Jesh. Horrible spot

If so, why didn't your all-world coach throw the flag?You mean like the catch they gave the Bengals earlier that clearly wasn't 2 feet in?Do the Steelers travel with their own officiating crew like the Harlem Globetrotters? Jesh. Horrible spot
So are you saying you think he had 2 feet in?If so, why didn't your all-world coach throw the flag?You mean like the catch they gave the Bengals earlier that clearly wasn't 2 feet in?Do the Steelers travel with their own officiating crew like the Harlem Globetrotters? Jesh. Horrible spot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manIf so, why didn't your all-world coach throw the flag?You mean like the catch they gave the Bengals earlier that clearly wasn't 2 feet in?Do the Steelers travel with their own officiating crew like the Harlem Globetrotters? Jesh. Horrible spot
In all fairness the two feet in was REALLY tough to spot. The reason it wasn't challenged is nobody knew if it was right or wrong.The spot on the ball should have been an easy deal, and didn't require Marv even talking to anyone to throw the flag.So are you saying you think he had 2 feet in?
The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.In all fairness the two feet in was REALLY tough to spot. The reason it wasn't challenged is nobody knew if it was right or wrong.The spot on the ball should have been an easy deal, and didn't require Marv even talking to anyone to throw the flag.So are you saying you think he had 2 feet in?
That's a no-brainer. 4th and that long is too risky against the Steelers defense, and you don't want to miss another long FG and give Pitt great field position.oh come on dont punt it
The replay in HD was pretty conclusive. On the field it looked like a catch, though. At least to me and I could care less who wins this game.The spot on the ball was just a terrible, awful call by the side judge.Comparing the two doesn't win any points in your arguments about officiating. One was an obvious bad call, the other was not.The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
My point was simply that bad calls go both ways. Most people seem to realize that. Except, seemingly, fans of teams who are playing the Steelers.The replay in HD was pretty conclusive. On the field it looked like a catch, though. At least to me and I could care less who wins this game.The spot on the ball was just a terrible, awful call by the side judge.Comparing the two doesn't win any points in your arguments about officiating. One was an obvious bad call, the other was not.The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
My point was simply that bad calls go both ways. Most people seem to realize that. Except, seemingly, fans of teams who are playing the Steelers.The replay in HD was pretty conclusive. On the field it looked like a catch, though. At least to me and I could care less who wins this game.The spot on the ball was just a terrible, awful call by the side judge.Comparing the two doesn't win any points in your arguments about officiating. One was an obvious bad call, the other was not.The replay was pretty conclusive. The reason it wasn't challenged is that Cincy did a good job of getting the ball snapped quickly.
