What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W10 - Seattle V Arizona (1 Viewer)

Of note... Julius Jones is on sideline with some sort of chest injury. Forsett played all three downs on the last Seattle series. Forsett did a great job picking off a blitzing Rolle keeping Hasselbeck upright.

 
What a bs PI call. Fitz was all over Wilson but they call the little guy. Then the replays only show the end with Wilson fighting him off.

Here's a bad call, Trufant wasn't back in bounds. Dunno if it's challengable.

 
Arch Stanton said:
What a bs PI call. Fitz was all over Wilson but they call the little guy. Then the replays only show the end with Wilson fighting him off.Here's a bad call, Trufant wasn't back in bounds. Dunno if it's challengable.
Click to expand...
Wilson had no idea where the ball was and there was contact. IMO that was an easy PI call.I think that pick gets overturned. Looked like Trufant didn't get his feet down before he caught the pass.
 
Enforcer said:
Arch Stanton said:
What a bs PI call. Fitz was all over Wilson but they call the little guy. Then the replays only show the end with Wilson fighting him off.Here's a bad call, Trufant wasn't back in bounds. Dunno if it's challengable.
Click to expand...
Wilson had no idea where the ball was and there was contact. IMO that was an easy PI call.I think that pick gets overturned. Looked like Trufant didn't get his feet down before he caught the pass.
Click to expand...
Fitz was all over him first, Wilson couldn't turn around because of it. At best it should've been offsetting.
 
I really don't undestand why Hightower is the Cardinals' short yardage guy. He's too slow, he doesn't have enough burst to get moving fast enough to use his power. Stuffed on 3rd and 1 and on 4th and goal from the one inch line again today, and despite a misconception among people on this board, was below average in the role last year.

 
IMO Hasselbeck is playing not only for his season in this game, but his career. Seattle loses this game and they are OUT of contention in the NFC West and the team goes into full rebuilding mode. I expect a huge effort, or at least everything the guys has.

 
FreeBaGeL said:
I really don't undestand why Hightower is the Cardinals' short yardage guy. He's too slow, he doesn't have enough burst to get moving fast enough to use his power. Stuffed on 3rd and 1 and on 4th and goal from the one inch line again today, and despite a misconception among people on this board, was below average in the role last year.
Click to expand...
I know that Hightower at this point is probably the better all around back than Wells but I am surprised how they seem to be afraid to let Wells get in there and develop as a player. They should have given it to him on the goaline there I feel.
 
TD Forsett

I think he's going to be a very nice RB towards the end of this year. Some may think he's too small but he's very compact with solid lower half. He's a lot more explosive and versatile than Julius.

 
Enforcer said:
IMO Hasselbeck is playing not only for his season in this game, but his career. Seattle loses this game and they are OUT of contention in the NFC West and the team goes into full rebuilding mode. I expect a huge effort, or at least everything the guys has.
Click to expand...
With as many needs (ie young players coming in) as the team has, I don't see Matt's job in jeopardy. At all. They know what Wallace has to give (not much) and no point throwing Teel out there with the bad line just to get experience at being sacked. They'll need Hass' leadership for the rebuild, which btw they are already in. Granted, it will ramp up after Ruskell is gone next year and the two 1st round picks.He may blow it at times, but Hass ALWAYS gives everything he has.
 
delusional said:
22yd warner, are you serious
Click to expand...
Seahawks are only rushing three and dropping everyone else back into coverage. Time will tell who can adjust and make changes. I expect a good chess match between Arizona offense and Seattle defensive coordinator Gus Bradley.
 
Arch Stanton said:
Enforcer said:
IMO Hasselbeck is playing not only for his season in this game, but his career. Seattle loses this game and they are OUT of contention in the NFC West and the team goes into full rebuilding mode. I expect a huge effort, or at least everything the guys has.
Click to expand...
With as many needs (ie young players coming in) as the team has, I don't see Matt's job in jeopardy. At all. They know what Wallace has to give (not much) and no point throwing Teel out there with the bad line just to get experience at being sacked. They'll need Hass' leadership for the rebuild, which btw they are already in. Granted, it will ramp up after Ruskell is gone next year and the two 1st round picks.He may blow it at times, but Hass ALWAYS gives everything he has.
Click to expand...
If pressed, I say Seattle looks elsewhere for a QB in the off-season. Perhaps the draft (Clausen), free agent (Campbell), or trade (Kolb)? I think they made a move to acquire a QB in some fashion. If they lose this game or the game to SF the season is realistically over. I have my doubts that the team will try to build around Hasselbeck if they go into full rebuilding mode.
 
Enforcer said:
Arch Stanton said:
Enforcer said:
IMO Hasselbeck is playing not only for his season in this game, but his career. Seattle loses this game and they are OUT of contention in the NFC West and the team goes into full rebuilding mode. I expect a huge effort, or at least everything the guys has.
Click to expand...
With as many needs (ie young players coming in) as the team has, I don't see Matt's job in jeopardy. At all. They know what Wallace has to give (not much) and no point throwing Teel out there with the bad line just to get experience at being sacked. They'll need Hass' leadership for the rebuild, which btw they are already in. Granted, it will ramp up after Ruskell is gone next year and the two 1st round picks.He may blow it at times, but Hass ALWAYS gives everything he has.
Click to expand...
If pressed, I say Seattle looks elsewhere for a QB in the off-season. Perhaps the draft (Clausen), free agent (Campbell), or trade (Kolb)? I think they made a move to acquire a QB in some fashion. If they lose this game or the game to SF the season is realistically over. I have my doubts that the team will try to build around Hasselbeck if they go into full rebuilding mode.
Click to expand...
Not a chance unless Hass gets hurt. They need too much OL, DL, RB, DB help to waste time trying to fill a position they already have a good starter at. They're not going to build around Hass, but they have to rebuild too much to start it off with a new QB. If there weren't so many glaring needs, then maybe, but no reason whatsoever to toss out a guy of Hass' experience. NICE, was wondering when The Golden Receiver was going to get the ball.

 
TD Carlson! :lmao:

Defensive coordinator Gus Bradley is screwing with Warner. Not one LB has blitzed even once so far. Be interesting to see how long they hold back before they try to surprise with Curry or Hill around the edge.

 
Forsett looks really good. I like him in a Warrick Dunn like way.

They say Jones is hopeful to return today. Then they shoot him on the sidelines where he looks like he's going to throw up. I don't think he'll return. Don't really think they need him.

 
Arch Stanton said:
Not a chance unless Hass gets hurt. They need too much OL, DL, RB, DB help to waste time trying to fill a position they already have a good starter at. They're not going to build around Hass, but they have to rebuild too much to start it off with a new QB. If there weren't so many glaring needs, then maybe, but no reason whatsoever to toss out a guy of Hass' experience.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree about the other needs. If I was the GM I invest in my O-line, D-Tackle, or a CB. However, the D-Tackles and CBs that are difference makers don't exactly grow on trees.
NICE, was wondering when The Golden Receiver was going to get the ball.
Click to expand...
:lmao:
 
What gives? Hass will throw a TD to John "Hot" Carlsson, but not Burleson? This is a topsy-turvy world we live in...

 
Fitz didn't make the catch, must be PI. Another ####ty call. tru had a hand on Fitz arm but what a ticky tack call. Legs got tangled.

Housh gets double bumped 10+ yards past the LOS but no call. Call it ticky tack on both sides or don't call it at all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Forsett another nice run. Can't understate how good he looks. Best comp I can give his Warrick Dunn. Does a great job hiding behind his line.

He'll need a power compliment down the road, but he's definitely got a spot in the league.

 
D said:
Forsett another nice run. Can't understate how good he looks. Best comp I can give his Warrick Dunn. Does a great job hiding behind his line.He'll need a power compliment down the road, but he's definitely got a spot in the league.
Click to expand...
They should have gotten him more involved many games ago.
 
GoBirds said:
SEA homers think Forsett can take over for Jones with injury and this performance?
Click to expand...
I can't speak for all Seattle fans, but I believe most of us have wanted to see Forsett get an expanded role. I'm not willing to knock Jones. He's a viable NFL RB. IMO most of the problems with the Seattle running attack fall on the discontinuity along the offensive line.
 
Enforcer said:
GoBirds said:
SEA homers think Forsett can take over for Jones with injury and this performance?
Click to expand...
I can't speak for all Seattle fans, but I believe most of us have wanted to see Forsett get an expanded role. I'm not willing to knock Jones. He's a viable NFL RB. IMO most of the problems with the Seattle running attack fall on the discontinuity along the offensive line.
Click to expand...
So best case the dreaded RBBC?
 
Enforcer said:
GoBirds said:
SEA homers think Forsett can take over for Jones with injury and this performance?
Click to expand...
I can't speak for all Seattle fans, but I believe most of us have wanted to see Forsett get an expanded role. I'm not willing to knock Jones. He's a viable NFL RB. IMO most of the problems with the Seattle running attack fall on the discontinuity along the offensive line.
Click to expand...
I'm willing to knock Jones. Can't stand him. I groaned when they signed him, and groan still. He has way too much famine and not near enough feast.
 
lyon812 said:
Enforcer said:
GoBirds said:
SEA homers think Forsett can take over for Jones with injury and this performance?
Click to expand...
I can't speak for all Seattle fans, but I believe most of us have wanted to see Forsett get an expanded role. I'm not willing to knock Jones. He's a viable NFL RB. IMO most of the problems with the Seattle running attack fall on the discontinuity along the offensive line.
Click to expand...
I'm willing to knock Jones. Can't stand him. I groaned when they signed him, and groan still. He has way too much famine and not near enough feast.
Click to expand...
What are your feelings about the play of our offensive line? Do you feel its been acceptable and blame for the rushing woes falls solely on Jones?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

QuizGuy66
*** Just In Time! The annual worst thread in the Shark Pool - the 2025 QuizGuy66 Season Prediction Thread *** (feel free to drop your own)
Replies
8
Views
980
IHEARTFF
I
rockaction
RB Jacory Croskey-Merritt, WAS
33 34 35
Replies
2K
Views
69K
ffmail4me
ffmail4me
The Noid
2025 Philadelphia Eagles - Slay reunion is off the table. Ronald Darby, u up?
78 79 80
Replies
4K
Views
514K
Bigboy10182000
Bigboy10182000

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top