Game Thread W2 - Green Bay V NY Giants (1 Viewer)

[mcintyre1]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

 

[j3r3m3y]

lol at Eli clearly dropping the F-Bomb

 

[scott72]

We gotta blitz or Eli's gonna kill us. The front 4 aren't getting it done..

 

[Challenge Everything]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

 

[mcintyre1]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

 

[Billy1x]

Looks like there is some Giants bias by the Ref. Spike after play should not offset.

 

[Billy1x]

Burress pulled something.

 

[RC94]

Looks like there is some Giants bias by the Ref. Spike after play should not offset.

 

[j3r3m3y]

Burress pulled something.

Limping to the locker room.

 

[RC94]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

I haven't looked at the stat line, but Jackson has been much better than Wynn IMO.

 

[Avery]

Looks like there is some Giants bias by the Ref. Spike after play should not offset.

FWIW, you're sounding pretty whiny about the officiating.

 

[Challenge Everything]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

What downs did they each run on? How much to go when they each ran? Field position when they ran? A simple assumption of what you made is inaccurate to say the least.

 

[BustedKnuckles]

shockey

 

[RC94]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

What downs did they each run on? How much to go when they each ran? Field position when they ran? A simple assumption of what you made is inaccurate to say the least.

They have had a fairly even distribution as far as down and field position. Jackson has been better.

 

[Bri]

Wynn's running tough and giving some shoulders back to the D. Jackson's running into brick walls.

(not all runs just.....)

 

[scott72]

Nice run Wynn..wow great 1st down..

 

[RC94]

shockey

Webster also.

 

[Bri]

shockey

Webster also.

if it hits both your hands....geesh Shockey should be having a good day.Webster's a joke, put the rook in over there.

 

[RC94]

Looks like there is some Giants bias by the Ref. Spike after play should not offset.

FWIW, you're sounding pretty whiny about the officiating.

He didn't even get his whining right. Those penalties offsetting helped GB, not NYG. If they didn't offset it would have been a first down for the Giants.

 

[scott72]

Another penalty on the Pack? Wow..

 

[mcintyre1]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

What downs did they each run on? How much to go when they each ran? Field position when they ran? A simple assumption of what you made is inaccurate to say the least.

What does that sentence even mean?

 

[RC94]

shockey

Webster also.

if it hits both your hands....geesh Shockey should be having a good day.Webster's a joke, put the rook in over there.

Plus the constant boneheaded penalties, which have been a part of Shockey's game since he joined the NFL. For all of his ability and the occasional great plays, he almost always offsets it with a stupid penalty or a inopportune drop.

 

[Challenge Everything]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

What downs did they each run on? How much to go when they each ran? Field position when they ran? A simple assumption of what you made is inaccurate to say the least.

What does that sentence even mean?

If all you are going to do is read the "stat line" and follow it up by making assumptions about who is playing better, than you are making inaccurate assumptions. Dont make those and then conclude someone is better.Stat line readers =

 

[abricru]

Any update on Plaxico?

 

[Avery]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

What downs did they each run on? How much to go when they each ran? Field position when they ran? A simple assumption of what you made is inaccurate to say the least.

What does that sentence even mean?

If all you are going to do is read the "stat line" and follow it up by making assumptions about who is playing better, than you are making inaccurate assumptions. Dont make those and then conclude someone is better.Stat line readers =

Not to butt in here, but not all of us have the "package" or can go out to watch all the game. Some of us rely on good description and accounts from people like you who are actually watching a game of interest to us so, please, give us some good infor beyond the stat line and help the rest of us out.

 

[mcintyre1]

Stat-line shows

That is your problem.

Can't see the game, so that's all I have to go on. But am I wrong that 7-25 > 7-8?

Yes, you are wrong with your assumption.

Care to explain why for those of us that can't see the game?

What downs did they each run on? How much to go when they each ran? Field position when they ran? A simple assumption of what you made is inaccurate to say the least.

What does that sentence even mean?

If all you are going to do is read the "stat line" and follow it up by making assumptions about who is playing better, than you are making inaccurate assumptions. Dont make those and then conclude someone is better.Stat line readers =

I don't understand why you're ragging on me for using the only information I have (a stat-line) to make my best guess at a situation that I can't observe... And, after I ask for more information as to why my assumption was wrong, you basically call me an idiot. Classy.

 

[Gaddis]

Any update on Plaxico?

 

[smackdaddies]

1st half - Neither team has looked good

Both Kickers have missed kicks

No WR has shown to be dominant

No RB has looked like a stud

Neither QB has lit it up

D's have played well, but no big scoring by them (int,fr, etc)

 

[Challenge Everything]

Jackson is running one move and done, one hit and done.

Wynn is at least shifting when running, moving forward.

Also, the offensive line is crap.

 

[scott72]

Jones! 1st down!

 

[Gaddis]

Is Plax in the game?

 

[scott72]

TD BUBBA!

 

[JZilla]

Touchdown Bubba Franks!

Never thought I'd say/type that again

 

[cubbie5150]

Ugh.. Driver is hiding out on some milk carton apparently.. Only 2/20

 

[Billy1x]

Packer 97 has groin injury

 

[Billy1x]

Burress grebbed Harris not the other way around

 

[Challenge Everything]

Horrible penalty. Both at fault and delay of game...

 

[scott72]

Play clock clearly showed zero. Nice one refs...Giants are getting a lot of calls in this one..

 

[RC94]

Is Plax in the game?

He is in the game

 

[Billy1x]

Giants offense line looks like one of the best in the NFL. They need to put Manning on the ground.

 

[Billy1x]

Toomer went for a knee after the play. He should be thrown out of the game.

 

[scott72]

Keep melting down for us Giants..

 

[Tremendous Upside]

For a taskmaster disciplinarian like Tom Coughlin to have a team this undisciplined consistently is inexcusable...

That goes to coaching, IMO...

 

[RC94]

For a taskmaster disciplinarian like Tom Coughlin to have a team this undisciplined consistently is inexcusable...That goes to coaching, IMO...

although some of these guys have been that way since before Coughlin arrived. He hasn't done much to correct it, though.

 

[scott72]

My God the Saints are bad. If your a Brees owner, start to get real worried..If your not a Brees owner, might be a nice buy low candidate..

I gotta say, this is nothing about how well their opponents have played, it's all about how badly the Saints have played.

I don't agree. Saints are making mistakes but the Bucs are dominating. Hard-hitting defense and perfect strikes from Garcia.

Brett has REALLY looked good today. He's making a lot of high percentage passes which is what we need. Offense moving again..

 

[Tremendous Upside]

Pack moving the ball consistently against NYG defense...

 

[Billy1x]

Favre so far at 81% completions and closing in on 300 yds.

 

[Tremendous Upside]

Start your TEs against the Ginats...

Witten goes off last week, this week Donald Lee is abusing the Gints and we even had a Bubba Franks sighting with a short TD

 

[scott72]

FUMBLE!!!! Another HUGE turnover by the specials teams!! WOW

 

[Billy1x]

Thank God for the Packer specials teams!!!