What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W3 - Green Bay V Chicago (1 Viewer)

Max Power

Footballguy
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bears | Devin Aromashodu inactive

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:19:36 -0700

Chicago Bears WR Devin Aromashodu will not play against the Green Bay Packers during Week 3, as he has been declared inactive, reports Brad Biggs, of The Chicago Tribune. He played just one snap during Week 2.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Packers | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:17:46 -0700

The Green Bay Packers have declared LB Brad Jones, SS Charlie Peprah, RB Dimitri Nance, OT Marshall Newhouse, DL Mike Neal, OG Nick McDonald, CB Patrick Lee, OT T.J. Lang inactive for Week 3.

Packers | Frank Zombo starting Week 3

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:28:11 -0700

Green Bay Packers LB Frank Zombo is starting in place of LB Brad Jones (knee) in Week 3, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's Tom Silverstein.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.
:shock: :yucky: :X :confused:

 
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.
:shock: :yucky: :X :blackdot:
I know, but he's just a name now. This isn't Tommie Harris circa 2006, this is Tommie Harris v. 2010. He's just a guy.
 
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.
:shock: :X :X :shock:
I know, but he's just a name now. This isn't Tommie Harris circa 2006, this is Tommie Harris v. 2010. He's just a guy.
Bad enough to be declared inactive? He's not that badAnd Aromoshadu inactive too? Wtf are they doing in Chicago? Has a bad game in week one and then benched in week 2 and inactive in week 3? :yucky: No different than Moore being inactive all last year and Bennett being inactive the year before that. I can't believe how dumb some of these people are. :blackdot:

 
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.
:shock: :yucky: :X :unsure:
I know, but he's just a name now. This isn't Tommie Harris circa 2006, this is Tommie Harris v. 2010. He's just a guy.
Bad enough to be declared inactive? He's not that badAnd Aromoshadu inactive too? Wtf are they doing in Chicago? Has a bad game in week one and then benched in week 2 and inactive in week 3? :confused: No different than Moore being inactive all last year and Bennett being inactive the year before that. I can't believe how dumb some of these people are. :rolleyes:
:shrug: He has 2 tackles in 2 games. He just gets pushed around now. I don't like a guy that's getting paid that much being inactive, but Tommie is a long time from when he was a factor.

DA? That's another question. Apparently, he doesn't know the plays for a slot receiver so he doesn't play. At least he looks like he could be a factor, so that one is a bit questionable for me.

 
This game could come down to Sam Shields - rookie db for the Pack who couldn't even start for Florida is the starting nickel back for the pack. I still can't believe a team has not taken him apart.

If Cutler can't, then I am going to have to eat some crow

 
This game could come down to Sam Shields - rookie db for the Pack who couldn't even start for Florida is the starting nickel back for the pack. I still can't believe a team has not taken him apart.If Cutler can't, then I am going to have to eat some crow
Bears seem to have a nice mix this year. The blitz can beat the OL easily, but Olsen will make you pay over the middle and knox/hester can get over top of about any CB in the NFL.
 
I have no problem with DA being inactive. Had some drops in week 1, can't pick up the offense and only played 1 snap last week. They can use the other spot for another guy.

I know Tommie isn't the same guy, but I think this has more to it. Attitude? Late to something? We'll find out sooner or later.

 
This game could come down to Sam Shields - rookie db for the Pack who couldn't even start for Florida is the starting nickel back for the pack. I still can't believe a team has not taken him apart.If Cutler can't, then I am going to have to eat some crow
Bears seem to have a nice mix this year. The blitz can beat the OL easily, but Olsen will make you pay over the middle and knox/hester can get over top of about any CB in the NFL.
Lets not get carried away. I like Olsen, but lets not pretend the bears WR are anything special
 
Kevin Shaffer starting at RT in place of Frank Omiyale, who is replacing Chris Williams at LT - that sounds like a recipe for disaster for the Bears.

 
Good start for Cutler - good O line protection, good pass, good catch by Knox, then the Packers blitz. That has to hurt when you get crushed by a D lineman

 
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.
:shock: :yucky: :X :unsure:
I know, but he's just a name now. This isn't Tommie Harris circa 2006, this is Tommie Harris v. 2010. He's just a guy.
Bad enough to be declared inactive? He's not that badAnd Aromoshadu inactive too? Wtf are they doing in Chicago? Has a bad game in week one and then benched in week 2 and inactive in week 3? :confused: No different than Moore being inactive all last year and Bennett being inactive the year before that. I can't believe how dumb some of these people are. :wub:
Yeah, it's not like the coaches get to see them in practice every day or anything. You know better than them.
 
Missed FG from the bears - Held the ball 5 minutes, moved it well, forced to take a FG, then the kicker blows it.

That kind of series will cost you a game

 
didn't see a thread, so I started one...

Bears | Week 3 Inactives

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0700

The Chicago Bears have declared QB Caleb Hanie, OT Chris Williams, DL Corey Wootton, WR Devin Aromashodu, CB Joshua Moore, RB Kahlil Bell, FS Major Wright, DL Tommie Harris inactive for Week 3.
:shock: :yucky: :X :unsure:
I know, but he's just a name now. This isn't Tommie Harris circa 2006, this is Tommie Harris v. 2010. He's just a guy.
Bad enough to be declared inactive? He's not that badAnd Aromoshadu inactive too? Wtf are they doing in Chicago? Has a bad game in week one and then benched in week 2 and inactive in week 3? :confused: No different than Moore being inactive all last year and Bennett being inactive the year before that. I can't believe how dumb some of these people are. :wub:
Yeah, it's not like the coaches get to see them in practice every day or anything. You know better than them.
The "coaches know more than you" is always a good argument when disagreeing with a coaching decision.
 
Missed FG from the bears - Held the ball 5 minutes, moved it well, forced to take a FG, then the kicker blows it.That kind of series will cost you a game
I wouldn't say missing a 49yd fg is "blowing it," and I also don't think having a 5 minute drive to start the game will cost them the game, even if they didn't get any points
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Missed FG from the bears - Held the ball 5 minutes, moved it well, forced to take a FG, then the kicker blows it.That kind of series will cost you a game
I wouldn't say missing a 49yd fb is "blowing it," and I also don't think having a 5 minute drive to start the game will cost them the game, even if they didn't get any points
You have the ball, you move the ball, you miss the fg. A team can't afford that against the Packers offense.Thats blowing it. And once, no, that won't cost the game. But its a bad way to start.
 
Missed FG from the bears - Held the ball 5 minutes, moved it well, forced to take a FG, then the kicker blows it.That kind of series will cost you a game
I wouldn't say missing a 49yd fb is "blowing it," and I also don't think having a 5 minute drive to start the game will cost them the game, even if they didn't get any points
You have the ball, you move the ball, you miss the fg. A team can't afford that against the Packers offense.Thats blowing it. And once, no, that won't cost the game. But its a bad way to start.
Been better off just going 3 and outeta:nm. i see where you're from
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top