But doesn't their restrictive government allow them to keep the bubble from bursting? All they have to do is keep people from moving to those areas. A house in a city in the middle of a desert that no one can occupy has no effect on the price of a home in another city.This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
First thing I thought of was the dark cities on the peninsula.So, thirty years from now:Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.
Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.
They are pouring billions of dollars into these things. Without constant maintenance, they will be unusable in a little more than a decade and will have to be condemned. Its a misallocation of resources that could be used to help China weather whatever crisis it may face in the future. Its also a huge red flag that they are probably wasting an enormous amount of money in other foolish ventures as well. Like an uneducated blue collar worker who hit the lottery, they spend their fortune in dumb ways and eventually will wind up broke again.But doesn't their restrictive government allow them to keep the bubble from bursting? All they have to do is keep people from moving to those areas. A house in a city in the middle of a desert that no one can occupy has no effect on the price of a home in another city.This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
I'm not arguing that it's not a misallocation of assets. I'm questioning the premise that these particular cities will cause a housing bubble burst.They are pouring billions of dollars into these things. Without constant maintenance, they will be unusable in a little more than a decade and will have to be condemned. Its a misallocation of resources that could be used to help China weather whatever crisis it may face in the future.But doesn't their restrictive government allow them to keep the bubble from bursting? All they have to do is keep people from moving to those areas. A house in a city in the middle of a desert that no one can occupy has no effect on the price of a home in another city.This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
Well they probably built these things with a plan in mind to recover the costs by having people move in to them and pay rent and taxes. Not having anyone move into them prevents a bubble bust I guess, but it has the same effect as a housing bubble bust because empty cities are a pure drain on capital with no benefit.I'm not arguing that it's not a misallocation of assets. I'm questioning the premise that these particular cities will cause a housing bubble burst.They are pouring billions of dollars into these things. Without constant maintenance, they will be unusable in a little more than a decade and will have to be condemned. Its a misallocation of resources that could be used to help China weather whatever crisis it may face in the future.But doesn't their restrictive government allow them to keep the bubble from bursting? All they have to do is keep people from moving to those areas. A house in a city in the middle of a desert that no one can occupy has no effect on the price of a home in another city.This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
Why?Time Kibitzer said:Mr. Pickles said:Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.Though North Korea is a bit more extreme. They created "cities" with the intention of no one ever living there; such as the city Kijŏng-dong which contains large buildings/apartments that have electricity but don't have interior rooms or windows.
Because it is the darkest spot on earth.It's North Korea and you're asking for a logical reason? They have a crazy #### running the place.Why?Time Kibitzer said:Mr. Pickles said:Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.Though North Korea is a bit more extreme. They created "cities" with the intention of no one ever living there; such as the city Kijŏng-dong which contains large buildings/apartments that have electricity but don't have interior rooms or windows.
Because it is the darkest spot on earth.It's North Korea and you're asking for a logical reason? They have a crazy #### running the place.Why?Time Kibitzer said:Mr. Pickles said:Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.Though North Korea is a bit more extreme. They created "cities" with the intention of no one ever living there; such as the city Kijŏng-dong which contains large buildings/apartments that have electricity but don't have interior rooms or windows.
North Korea – most isolated country in the world
By Village Mayor • Jul 28th, 2008 • Category: Amazing Places, Latest Post
Key Facts
Location: Above South Korea
This is the Asian century. China will overtake us economically-speaking at some point in the not too distant future.Fensalk said:This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
Never asked for a logical reason, just simply why. (and there is an actual answer in your link)Because it is the darkest spot on earth.It's North Korea and you're asking for a logical reason? They have a crazy #### running the place.Why?Time Kibitzer said:Mr. Pickles said:Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.Though North Korea is a bit more extreme. They created "cities" with the intention of no one ever living there; such as the city Kijŏng-dong which contains large buildings/apartments that have electricity but don't have interior rooms or windows.
Mr. Pickles said:Getting a strong North Korean vibe here.
This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
You've been reading Tom Friedman too much.This is the Asian century. China will overtake us economically-speaking at some point in the not too distant future.Fensalk said:This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
Great place to move people if a populated city gets destroyed. flood, earthquake, war, Godzilla.
You mean Godzirra.Great place to move people if a populated city gets destroyed. flood, earthquake, war, Godzilla.
I just think its a bad business decision. No savvy businessman is going to outlay this much in resources before its needed, because its an unnecessary risk. If this is an example of what China thinks is good business then this line of thinking will come back to haunt them and sooner rather than later.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
Okaaay.... maybe so. we'll see. I can tell you, though, I was just recently hired to negotiate a contract to delivery 10,000 metric tons minimum of environmentally-friendly snow melt material from the U.S. to Shanghai. The deal is still in process, but that's an awful lot of snow-melt... the contract would run to April. They're specifically looking for potassium acetate or sodium acetate, or some combination of these. No chlorides.I just think its a bad business decision. No savvy businessman is going to outlay this much in resources before its needed, because its an unnecessary risk. If this is an example of what China thinks is good business then this line of thinking will come back to haunt them and sooner rather than later.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
it's really just a community college.GroveDiesel said:The craziest one may be the university city that they built with the anticipation of 1.3 million students attending!
This buildout is likely funded by the govt, not private corporations. No private business would ever take on this kind of risk, which is why the govt has to fund it. The govt is likely doing this because they have specific plans with regard to urban migration trends and resource deployment...but only they know the full reasons for them.A housing bubble burst would absolutly not hurt the Chinese population as much as it hurt Americans in2008/2009. They have much lower household debt % and the house makes up a much smaller proportion of their overall wealth. Also, the Chinese govt wants housing prices to fall - they want to improve housing affordability for all the rural migrants and young college grads that currently do not have have homes in the city.I just think its a bad business decision. No savvy businessman is going to outlay this much in resources before its needed, because its an unnecessary risk. If this is an example of what China thinks is good business then this line of thinking will come back to haunt them and sooner rather than later.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.
That's a heck of a long term plan. At least one of the ghost cities pictured is over a decade old. Which means that things are probably already starting to fall into disrepair. IMO, so far these ghost cities are just a good example of why communism fails on a large level. Mis-allocation of resources.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
I can't stand him, but simple demographics dictate that China will be the world's #1 economic power before too long.You've been reading Tom Friedman too much.This is the Asian century. China will overtake us economically-speaking at some point in the not too distant future.Fensalk said:This is an argument for why China will never overtake the US as a superpower. A powerful government bureaucracy is far too inefficient at allocating resources. A housing bubble bust will hurt them far more than it ever hurt the US. Sure, they may hold an advantage at the moment, but they are unlikely to adapt well to future changes. A free market's strength is in how it does the best job of allocating resources and thus is relatively resilient in the face of change.
And democratic governments don't mis-allocate resources?That's a heck of a long term plan. At least one of the ghost cities pictured is over a decade old. Which means that things are probably already starting to fall into disrepair. IMO, so far these ghost cities are just a good example of why communism fails on a large level. Mis-allocation of resources.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
Fixed.Okaaay.... maybe so. we'll see.
I can tell you, though, I was just recently hired to negotiate a contract to delivery 10,000 metric tons minimum per day of environmentally-friendly snow melt material from the U.S. to Shanghai. The deal is still in process, but that's an awful lot of snow-melt... the contract would run to April. They're specifically looking for potassium acetate or sodium acetate, or some combination of these. No chlorides.
Where do you suppose all this is going? Northern China, where temps can go -20C to -30C. And they are absolutely hell-bent on keeping these roads open under heavy snow and freezing cold temps... and that's where a lot of these ghost cities are located.
And my cut? $1 per ton.Need to make this work!
I'll split a duplex with you Snake.I wonder if we could get in on some of that action. I wonder how much some of that real estate is.
I think you mean capitalist economies since that would be the apples to apples comparison. And capitalist economies definitely allocate resources improperly, but rarely on this big of a scale and when those mistakes are made, they're quickly fixed.And democratic governments don't mis-allocate resources?That's a heck of a long term plan. At least one of the ghost cities pictured is over a decade old. Which means that things are probably already starting to fall into disrepair. IMO, so far these ghost cities are just a good example of why communism fails on a large level. Mis-allocation of resources.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.
In communist China, the city moves to you. Or something like that.This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.BobbyLayne said:Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...
Fixed.Okaaay.... maybe so. we'll see.
I can tell you, though, I was just recently hired to negotiate a contract to delivery 10,000 metric tons minimum per day of environmentally-friendly snow melt material from the U.S. to Shanghai. The deal is still in process, but that's an awful lot of snow-melt... the contract would run to April. They're specifically looking for potassium acetate or sodium acetate, or some combination of these. No chlorides.
Where do you suppose all this is going? Northern China, where temps can go -20C to -30C. And they are absolutely hell-bent on keeping these roads open under heavy snow and freezing cold temps... and that's where a lot of these ghost cities are located.
And my cut? $1 per ton.Need to make this work!
Yeah, I know. And I also know price is going to be a huge factor in the decision, and we are absolutely NOT low... not only that, we aren't even close. But I don't know about the quality of what is available in China, either. This isn't quite like dumping down road salt... the potassium acetate comes in liquid form and needs to be put down before a storm; the sodium acetete can be put down afterwards. What I was telling them was I wasn't just selling them bulk chemical, but chemical refined, processed, and shaped especially for de-icing. It's probably not going to go through, though... I know about where the Chinese suppliers are coming in price-wise, and unless they have money to burn (and they may), I doubt I'll get the contract.Fixed.Okaaay.... maybe so. we'll see.
I can tell you, though, I was just recently hired to negotiate a contract to delivery 10,000 metric tons minimum per day of environmentally-friendly snow melt material from the U.S. to Shanghai. The deal is still in process, but that's an awful lot of snow-melt... the contract would run to April. They're specifically looking for potassium acetate or sodium acetate, or some combination of these. No chlorides.
Where do you suppose all this is going? Northern China, where temps can go -20C to -30C. And they are absolutely hell-bent on keeping these roads open under heavy snow and freezing cold temps... and that's where a lot of these ghost cities are located.
And my cut? $1 per ton.Need to make this work!
Most of the suppliers of this stuff are located in China.link
What you don't understand is there is no risk. If China wants to move a population there they can and will. If they want to move factories there again they will. It's not like here were the people have rights.I just think its a bad business decision. No savvy businessman is going to outlay this much in resources before its needed, because its an unnecessary risk. If this is an example of what China thinks is good business then this line of thinking will come back to haunt them and sooner rather than later.johnnycakes said:Again, I think we're seeing only part of the picture. This is China... billions of people. They do not want sudden, massive influxes of peasants from the countryside into existing cities. And it's not like any company - western or Chinese - can just decide to buy up a piece of property and build a plant like we do here. Everything needs government approval. How do you know there aren't numerous manufacturers who have signed deals to build manufacturing plants in these cities, once the infrastructure is in place? It's just not like the Chinese to build up these massive cities, spending tons of money, for no reason at all. They are extraordinarily frugal. Again, I'm just guessing, but I suspect within the next 5 years, we're going to see substantial industry in what are now "ghost cities", and not by luck or happenstance, but by design.If a corporation built several campuses and left them sitting unused for years, would you think they were planning on going on a massive hiring spree and telling their workers to relocate to these campuses? Or would you think they are taking wild and foolish risks with their venture capital?This is China. Build it, they will be told to come. Especially if some big manufacturers start building manufacturing plants nearby. My guess is these are cities in the making... we're only seeing part of the picture, without knowing what the long-term plan is.Build it, they will come
![]()
OK, wait for it...wait...wait...