massraider
Footballguy
Well, Dang.
Giants cut Burress amid gun case
Associated Press
NEW YORK -- The New York Giants have released wide receiver Plaxico Burress, the team announced Friday.
A gun possession case against Burress in New York was adjourned Tuesday until June.

I am sure people will get excited about picking him up, but between possible jail time and a suspension, I dunno how much he can help anyone this year.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.
and how's the leg doing? has anyone heard anything on that?I am sure people will get excited about picking him up, but between possible jail time and a suspension, I dunno how much he can help anyone this year.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.
I am sure people will get excited about picking him up, but between possible jail time and a suspension, I dunno how much he can help anyone this year.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.
he probably wont play any meaningfull football until 2010He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.
Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.Ifthe dude's head is on straight this past year, they might have won another SB this yearHe played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
I certainly wouldn't be. He just doesn't get it done consistently enough to warrant the financial commitment. And you clearly can't rely on him.I am sure people will get excited about picking him up, but between possible jail time and a suspension, I dunno how much he can help anyone this year.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.
Agreed, but that still doesn't erase how important he was in the Giants Super Bowl run. No way do they beat the Packers without him (him taking Al Harris to school was the biggest reason why they won that game, IMO, not Favre's meltdown), and he caught the winning TD in the Super Bowl. Things like that should keep you in fairly high regard with fans of the team for a long time, even if you are dumb enough to do what Burress did. But so many have that "What have you done for me lately?" attitude. That's how it goes.Ifthe dude's head is on straight this past year, they might have won another SB this yearHe played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
As a Giants fan I certainly appreciate what he did for the team, but I don't appreciate him acting like a thug. Guys like this need to be sent a message - if you act like a thug, you won't be playing in the NFL.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
I think fans are well within their rights to appreciate past accomplishments ("He played really well for us and that will be missed") while also recognizing that a player has also let them down ("He was also a real jackass a lot of the time"). In the end, it should always be about what's best for the team going forward.Agreed, but that still doesn't erase how important he was in the Giants Super Bowl run. No way do they beat the Packers without him (him taking Al Harris to school was the biggest reason why they won that game, IMO, not Favre's meltdown), and he caught the winning TD in the Super Bowl. Things like that should keep you in fairly high regard with fans of the team for a long time, even if you are dumb enough to do what Burress did. But so many have that "What have you done for me lately?" attitude. That's how it goes.Ifthe dude's head is on straight this past year, they might have won another SB this yearHe played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
You have to have that attitude. The teams have that attitude. And as much as he helped them two years ago, he might've hurt them last year.Agreed, but that still doesn't erase how important he was in the Giants Super Bowl run. No way do they beat the Packers without him (him taking Al Harris to school was the biggest reason why they won that game, IMO, not Favre's meltdown), and he caught the winning TD in the Super Bowl. Things like that should keep you in fairly high regard with fans of the team for a long time, even if you are dumb enough to do what Burress did. But so many have that "What have you done for me lately?" attitude. That's how it goes.Ifthe dude's head is on straight this past year, they might have won another SB this yearHe played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
Agreed. But I still am surprised a Giants fans would say, "Good riddance," in reference to his being cut. Make no mistake about it, though: This is a move the Giants probably had to make.In the end, it should always be about what's best for the team going forward.
I am upset that we lost a great reciever....but we lost him last year. This sucks until we replace him. I hope they go with Boldin although I think they need someone like Braylon, but one who actually catches the ball.They must have decided that they don't want to hold up production and wait to see what happens with him and jail time. the delay in his hearing probably helped them diecide it was time to cut bait.As a Giants fan I certainly appreciate what he did for the team, but I don't appreciate him acting like a thug. Guys like this need to be sent a message - if you act like a thug, you won't be playing in the NFL.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
Forget that. This has Dallas written all over it. Add in they could use another WRRumors pertaining to Tennessee and Chicago in 3...2...1...
I think fans are well within their rights to appreciate past accomplishments ("He played really well for us and that will be missed") while also recognizing that a player has also let them down ("He was also a real jackass a lot of the time"). In the end, it should always be about what's best for the team going forward.Agreed, but that still doesn't erase how important he was in the Giants Super Bowl run. No way do they beat the Packers without him (him taking Al Harris to school was the biggest reason why they won that game, IMO, not Favre's meltdown), and he caught the winning TD in the Super Bowl. Things like that should keep you in fairly high regard with fans of the team for a long time, even if you are dumb enough to do what Burress did. But so many have that "What have you done for me lately?" attitude. That's how it goes.Ifthe dude's head is on straight this past year, they might have won another SB this yearHe played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
Plax was a weapon that is hard to replace, but you can't be held hostage (similar to TO) and at some point it is time to move on. I would hope the Giants have something up their sleeve because I like all the receivers they have, they are all good, but none of them are a #1 weapon.I heard he limped off into the sunset.I couldn't be happier seeing Pax-a-Colt get his just desserts.
I am no legal guy, but if Plax is really turning down plea deals, and goes to trial, we might not see this guy for a few years.Giants Offered Plaxico A New Deal Before Grievance Hearing
Posted by Mike Florio on April 3, 2009, 4:06 p.m. EDT
In the wake of the apparently abrupt decision of the Giants to cut receiver Plaxico Burress, a league source tells us that the team offered him a new contract aimed at resolving the pending grievance between player and team before Wednesday’s hearing.
Per the source, Burress declined the offer.
We’re told that, if Burress had accepted the deal, the team likely would have kept him for 2009, despite the current uncertainty regarding his legal status.
The postponement of a March 31 hearing in his criminal prosecution was viewed as a signal that a plea deal is coming. But we’ve heard that Burress is balking at any proposed bargain involving jail time. So unless he works out an agreement and enters jail right now or stands trial as soon as possible, it’s unclear when or if he’d be available to play in 2009.
The better approach at this point might be to attempt to engineer the court proceedings to allow Burress to play football in 2009, and then to stand trial or start a prison term after the season ends.
Even with such an approach, who’d be interested in a guy facing felony charges that could result in a mandatory minimum prison stay of 3.5 years? And even if a team is interested, we doubt that he’ll get anything more than the veteran minimum salary on a one-year deal.
Without him the Giants never would have gotten to the Super Bowl. He won the GB game pretty much by himself.He played really well for us and that will be missed, although that can be replaced. He was also a real jackass a lot of the time so good riddance.Good riddance? Wow, I thought Giants fans, despite all of Burress' knucklehead behavior, would be a little more appreciative of a guy whom without you wouldn't have won that Super Bowl last year. Guess not.
I think it also because he demanded a trade which was downright crazy. The guy is downright nuts.http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2009/04...re_to_leav.htmlI am no legal guy, but if Plax is really turning down plea deals, and goes to trial, we might not see this guy for a few years.Giants Offered Plaxico A New Deal Before Grievance Hearing
Posted by Mike Florio on April 3, 2009, 4:06 p.m. EDT
In the wake of the apparently abrupt decision of the Giants to cut receiver Plaxico Burress, a league source tells us that the team offered him a new contract aimed at resolving the pending grievance between player and team before Wednesday’s hearing.
Per the source, Burress declined the offer.
We’re told that, if Burress had accepted the deal, the team likely would have kept him for 2009, despite the current uncertainty regarding his legal status.
The postponement of a March 31 hearing in his criminal prosecution was viewed as a signal that a plea deal is coming. But we’ve heard that Burress is balking at any proposed bargain involving jail time. So unless he works out an agreement and enters jail right now or stands trial as soon as possible, it’s unclear when or if he’d be available to play in 2009.
The better approach at this point might be to attempt to engineer the court proceedings to allow Burress to play football in 2009, and then to stand trial or start a prison term after the season ends.
Even with such an approach, who’d be interested in a guy facing felony charges that could result in a mandatory minimum prison stay of 3.5 years? And even if a team is interested, we doubt that he’ll get anything more than the veteran minimum salary on a one-year deal.
For months, the Giants had insisted they would welcome Plaxico Burress back if his legal situation worked out in his favor. So why today, with his legal issues still up in the air, did they pull the rug out from under him by releasing him?The answer, according to someone familiar with the Giants' thinking, is Burress pushed back in his requests for a trade and in his lack of flexibility in a recent contract squabble.
I was listening to the analysis on sirius NFL and they were saying that he had a large roster bonus, a workout incentive and something else that was due that was what caused the cutting so they wouldnt have to pay that. His actual salary was 1 mill this year.Anyone know the Giants cap hit on this one? It's got to be pretty ugly, no?
That was my first guess. Cutler needs someone to throw to, I don't know why the Bears wouldn't make a call.plax to the bears? titans should probably make a call.
Not gonna happen. As closely as I follow Dallas, the thought of him coming here never even crossed my mind. The Bears were the first and pretty much only team that came to mind in only giving it a moment of thought. Reason being, as has been mentioned, he's looking at doing time. He has no market at all right now. I don't realistically see anybody placing a call until after his time and suspension are determined. For the time being, rosters (and most caps) are too tight to consider a wildcard. We (and Plax) can write off 2009.Not accepting any plea deals puts him in serious jeopardy. If he loses his trial (which I'm nearly certain he will), he'll get a pretty harsh sentence. He/we may need to write off 2010 as well. Maybe even 2011.Forget that. This has Dallas written all over it. Add in they could use another WR![]()
Rumors pertaining to Tennessee and Chicago in 3...2...1...
Code:For months, the Giants had insisted they would welcome Plaxico Burress back if his legal situation worked out in his favor. So why today, with his legal issues still up in the air, did they pull the rug out from under him by releasing him?The answer, according to someone familiar with the Giants' thinking, is Burress pushed back in his requests for a trade and in his lack of flexibility in a recent contract squabble.

This was my thinking as well. I didn't think he'd go to jail before but this greatly ups the likelihood of him doing time.Absent local pressure not to hurt the home team one wonders if the prosecution will now stiffen in their resolve.