Yeah...She's just not quite hot enough for me to root for her.
plonk, you might have a point if the modern washington filibuster was anything like this.Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
She is actually doing a filibuster, unlike most others threaten a filibuster. Rand Paul being the exception.Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
Filibuster has it place but using it over 100 times in 5 years(not counting judicial appointments) is ridiculous here are just a small sample of filibuster victims:Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
Many of those had bi-partisan support until the advent of a black president and the tea party.H.R. 12 - Paycheck Fairness Act H.R. 448 -- Elder Abuse Victims Act
H.R. 466 - Wounded Veteran Job Security Act
H.R. 515 - Radioactive Import Deterrence Act
H.R. 549 -- National Bombing Prevention Act
H.R. 577 - Vision Care for Kids Act
H.R. 626 - Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act
H.R. 1029 - Alien Smuggling and Terrorism Prevention Act
H.R. 1168 -- Veterans Retraining Act
H.R. 1171 - Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program Reauthorization
H.R. 1293 -- Disabled Veterans Home Improvement and Structural Alteration Grant Increase Act
H.R. 1429 -- Stop AIDS in Prison Act
H.R.5281 -- DREAM Act
S.3985 -- Emergency Senior Citizens Relief Act
S.3816 -- Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act
S.3369 -- DISCLOSE Act, A bill to provide for additional disclosure requirements for corporations, labor organizations, Super PACs and other entities
S.2237 -- Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act
S.2343 -- Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act
S.1660 -- American Jobs Act of 2011
S.3457 -- Veterans Jobs Corps Act
I'm wrong. This is pretty good.Debate on parliamentary rules in the Texas Senate is somewhat less exciting than the Internet Scanner.
Based on the responses this post received, it sounds like the answer is "yes."Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
I think that the act of being on your feet for 12+ hours with no bathroom/water/food/gangsta lean is pretty impressive regardless. I think if more people actually did this, the filibuster would be used less and actually mean more.Based on the responses this post received, it sounds like the answer is "yes."Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
Actually she's not bad at all.Yeah...She's just not quite hot enough for me to root for her.
Two thumbs up for that.She is actually doing a filibuster, unlike most others threaten a filibuster. Rand Paul being the exception.Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
I sort of agree with this. I'm not a big fan of theatrics, but I'll grant that stuff like this brings attention to a person's cause in a way that a procedural filibuster doesn't. I will also give this lady and the Texas Democrats lots of credit for apparently outmaneuvering the state GOP -- it sounds like they got soundly outplayed here.I think that the act of being on your feet for 12+ hours with no bathroom/water/food/gangsta lean is pretty impressive regardless. I think if more people actually did this, the filibuster would be used less and actually mean more.Based on the responses this post received, it sounds like the answer is "yes."Is this where we state how a filibuster is good/bad depending on if it stops a bill that we like or not?
That dude really wants to ask questions.oops back to the bill
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/img/photos/2013/06/25/51/43/272davisback2.jpgsomeone helped her put on a back brace so they just voted to get her another warning point. That makes 2. If she gets a third the filibuster is over.
Getting good again. She is refusing to take questions.
woah she is reading the bill. This is boring again. Hope she makes it!
she has 2 warning points. The first was for talking about non-germane issues and the second was for the back brace. They want to try to trip her up, as if she gets 1 more point they can vote to end the filibuster.That dude really wants to ask questions.oops back to the bill
As we just learned, Parliamentary rule states that she does not have to accept any though.
You're the Texan in this thread, right? The story in the OP says that the GOP knew this was coming, so I'm assuming there was no way to stop her from getting the floor.For the third time, does anyone know how she got the floor?
Why would it be killed if she reaches midnight?she has to make it to midnight (CT) to kill the bill
Special session is over.Why would it be killed if she reaches midnight?she has to make it to midnight (CT) to kill the bill
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/06/25/texas-state-sen-wendy-davis-continues-one-woman-filibuster-of-anti-abortion-bill/For the third time, does anyone know how she got the floor?
Maybe, but that's a year and a half away. Lots can happen.This will get picked back up in the next session. The way Latinos vote on this issue it will pass eventually
It seems like there has to be an opening for someone to take the floor at the beginning of the debate on a bill. This is why the Senate queued this bill for debate to start the special session. Puts the most pressure on her. Had she yielded the floor, someone could have moved for a vote.For the third time, does anyone know how she got the floor?
http://rhrealitychec...-abortion-bill/How did she get the floor?
http://rhrealitychec...-abortion-bill/When did she start? How did she end up with the conch?
Texas is every other year, so I wouldn't be too sure about that. Won't be in session again until 2015.It (unfortunately) will be passed eventually anyway but props to her for bringing attention to this disgrace of a bill.