What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Great Linebackers Playing Together (1 Viewer)

Chase Stuart

Footballguy
From the PFR blog:

This post is not a look at the greatest linebacking corps ever. We might attempt to do that one day, but today I’ve got another thought on my mind today. What teams have seen a bunch of great linebackers playing together while those players were in their primes?

The first thing we need to do is rate the linebackers. You could use Pro Bowl nominations, or games started, or some combination of sacks, turnovers and tackles. Here at PFR, Doug developed the Approximate Value system — it assigns an approximate value to measure the approximate contribution of each player in each season since 1950. While none of us claim that the Approximate Value system is a perfect measure of player performance, we believe it’s a big improvement on things like games started or other objective criteria one might use to create a set of inter-positional rankings.

You could simply look at a list of the top linebacker by AV per team for each season. For various reasons, I chose a different approach. I looked at the peak three years of every linebacker ever, and assigned that as a rating for each linebacker. Then I gave him an age adjusted score for each season. That age adjusted score is the rating I’m giving each linebacker for each season of play, not his actual AV grade.

....
More methodology discussion available here. I know you guys won't read that, though :popcorn: , so here's the very quick explanation.The number in parentheses is the player's age that season; the second number is a very approximate guess at his average value during his best seasons. Then based on a player's age (28-30 = very good, really young or really old = bad) and his APPROXIMATE value at his peak (18 = excellent; 10 = good; 5 = bad), I gave a score to each player for each age. Note that repeat seasons are deleted -- so the '85 Bears won't show up here since the '87 Bears had the exact same LBs and they ranked higher. And why are they ranked higher? Because Singletary at 29, Marshall at 25 and Wilson at 30 are assumed to be better than Singeltary at 27, Marshall at 23 and Wilston at 28. Actual production in any given season is not considered. This is not a look at the best LBs ever, or the best LB corps ever. Just a look at the best set of great linebackers playing at their best seasons for the same team.

As for approximate value, note that it's very approximate. All I'll say is it's better than any other method of ranking defensive players. But it's far from perfect. E.g., Swilling's peak value is 19.0 while LT's peak value is 18.0. Taylor was the better player, of course; the only thing I'll say about the approximate value system is generally, a group of players with a rating of 19.0 will be better than a group of players with a rating of 15.0. Certainly any one player at 18 can be better than any one player at 19.

Enough talk; here's the list. Starting with the 4-3 LBs:

Code:
BAL-2006	Ray Lewis (31): 20		   Adalius Thomas (29): 15.6	 Bart Scott (26): 13GNB-1963	Ray Nitschke (27): 15.6	  Bill Forester (31): 16		Dan Currie (28): 14.3CHI-1987	Mike Singletary (29): 17.6   Wilber Marshall (25): 18.3	Otis Wilson (30): 11KAN-1972	Willie Lanier (27): 17.3	 Bobby Bell (32): 16		   Jim Lynch (27): 13.3CHI-1959	Bill George (30): 18		 Joe Fortunato (29): 15.3	  Larry Morris (26): 10.3PIT-1978	Jack Ham (30): 17			Jack Lambert (26): 18		 Loren Toews (27): 8.66CHI-2007	Brian Urlacher (29): 19.3	Lance Briggs (27): 15.6	   Hunter Hillenmeyer (27): 7CHI-1955	Bill George (26): 18		 Joe Fortunato (25): 15.3	  George Connor (30): 12.3PIT-1980	Jack Lambert (28): 18		Jack Ham (32): 17			 Robin Cole (25): 9.66RAM-1976	Isiah Robertson (27): 17.6   Jack Reynolds (29): 12.6	  Jim Youngblood (26): 11.3GNB-1968	Dave Robinson (27): 14.3	 Ray Nitschke (32): 15.6	   Lee Roy Caffey (27): 13PHI-1954	Chuck Bednarik (29): 20.6	Bucko Kilroy (33): 14		 Wayne Robinson (24): 11.3PIT-1979	Jack Lambert (27): 18		Jack Ham (31): 17			 Dirt Winston (24): 8.66BAL-2001	Ray Lewis (26): 20		   Peter Boulware (27): 11.3	 Jamie Sharper (27): 10.3RAM-1975	Isiah Robertson (26): 17.6   Jack Reynolds (28): 12.6	  Ken Geddes (29): 10.3RAM-1967	Maxie Baughan (29): 15.6	 Myron Pottios (28): 12		Jack Pardee (31): 11.6BAL-1972	Mike Curtis (29): 16		 Ted Hendricks (25): 17		Ray May (27): 8.66BAL-1973	Mike Curtis (30): 16		 Ted Hendricks (26): 17		Stan White (24): 10CHI-1970	**** Butkus (28): 15.6	   Lee Roy Caffey (29): 13	   Doug Buffone (26): 9.33ARI-1994	Wilber Marshall (32): 18.3   Seth Joyner (30): 13.6		Eric Hill (28): 7.66PIT-1976	Jack Ham (28): 17			Jack Lambert (24): 18		 Andy Russell (35): 13.6TAM-1999	Derrick Brooks (26): 19	  Shelton Quarles (28): 10	  Hardy Nickerson (34): 14.6GNB-1974	Ted Hendricks (27): 17	   Fred Carr (28): 12			Jim Carter (26): 9DAL-1967	Chuck Howley (31): 16.3	  Lee Roy Jordan (26): 13	   Dave Edwards (28): 9.33CLE-1952	Bill Willis (31): 18.3	   Tommy W. Thompson (25): 14	Walt Michaels (23): 13
And the 3-4 LBs
Code:
NOR-1990  Pat Swilling (26): 19	   Sam Mills (31): 17		 Rickey Jackson (32): 14.6   Vaughan Johnson (28): 11.6PIT-1995  Greg Lloyd (30): 17.3	   Kevin Greene (33): 16.6	Chad Brown (25): 14.3	   Levon Kirkland (26): 13BAL-2003  Ray Lewis (28): 20		  Adalius Thomas (26): 15.6  Peter Boulware (29): 11.3   Ed Hartwell (25): 8.66PIT-2003  James Farrior (28): 14.6	Jason Gildon (31): 14.6	Joey Porter (26): 14		Kendrell Bell (25): 10.3BAL-2004  Ray Lewis (29): 20		  Adalius Thomas (27): 15.6  Ed Hartwell (26): 8.66	  Terrell Suggs (22): 13.3DEN-1979  Randy Gradishar (27): 16	Tom Jackson (28): 13.6	 Bob Swenson (26): 11.6	  Joe Rizzo (29): 9DEN-1981  Randy Gradishar (29): 16	Tom Jackson (30): 13.6	 Bob Swenson (28): 11.6	  Larry Evans (28): 7OAK-1979  Ted Hendricks (32): 17	  Phil Villapiano (30): 13.6 Rod Martin (25): 13		 Monte Johnson (28): 8.66PIT-1997  Greg Lloyd (32): 17.3	   Levon Kirkland (28): 13	Jason Gildon (25): 14.6	 Earl Holmes (24): 9.66NYG-1991  Lawrence Taylor (32): 18	Pepper Johnson (27): 13.3  Carl Banks (29): 11		 Gary Reasons (29): 7PIT-1982  Jack Lambert (30): 18	   Jack Ham (34): 17		  Robin Cole (27): 9.66	   Loren Toews (31): 8.66BAL-2007  Ray Lewis (32): 20		  Bart Scott (27): 13		Terrell Suggs (25): 13.3	Jarret Johnson (26): 5.66OAK-1978  Ted Hendricks (31): 17	  Phil Villapiano (29): 13.6 Monte Johnson (27): 8.66	Willie Hall (29): 7.33PIT-1991  Greg Lloyd (26): 17.3	   Hardy Nickerson (26): 14.6 David Little (32): 9.66	 Bryan Hinkle (32): 9DET-1993  Pat Swilling (29): 19	   Chris Spielman (28): 12	George Jamison (31): 7.66   Dennis Gibson (29): 6.66NYG-1988  Lawrence Taylor (29): 18	Carl Banks (26): 11		Pepper Johnson (24): 13.3   Harry Carson (35): 13.3PIT-2000  Jason Gildon (28): 14.6	 Levon Kirkland (31): 13	Earl Holmes (27): 9.66	  Joey Porter (23): 14NYG-1990  Lawrence Taylor (31): 18	Pepper Johnson (26): 13.3  Carl Banks (28): 11		 Steve DeOssie (28): 4PIT-1999  Jason Gildon (27): 14.6	 Levon Kirkland (30): 13	Earl Holmes (26): 9.66	  Carlos Emmons (26): 9PIT-2006  Joey Porter (29): 14		James Farrior (31): 14.6   Larry Foote (26): 9		 Clark Haggans (29): 7.66DEN-1980  Randy Gradishar (28): 16	Tom Jackson (29): 13.6	 Larry Evans (27): 7		 Rob Nairne (26): 7.33PIT-1992  Greg Lloyd (27): 17.3	   Hardy Nickerson (27): 14.6 David Little (33): 9.66	 Jerrol Williams (25): 5.33NYG-1983  Harry Carson (30): 13.3	 Lawrence Taylor (24): 18   Brad Van Pelt (32): 9.66	Brian Kelley (32): 9DEN-1982  Randy Gradishar (30): 16	Tom Jackson (31): 13.6	 Larry Evans (29): 7		 Jim Ryan (25): 8DEN-1989  Karl Mecklenburg (29): 15.6 Simon Fletcher (27): 10	Michael Brooks (25): 10.6   Rick Dennison (31): 8.33
 
NOR-1990 Pat Swilling (26): 19 Sam Mills (31): 17 Rickey Jackson (32): 14.6 Vaughan Johnson (28): 11.6
damn straight.i always thought it was the '92 dome patrol that was the best. all four went to the pro-bowl that year.
 
On the 3-4s, if you take Denver, Baltimore and Pittsburgh out of the equation, you ain't left with much.

 
NOR-1990 Pat Swilling (26): 19 Sam Mills (31): 17 Rickey Jackson (32): 14.6 Vaughan Johnson (28): 11.6
NYG-1988 Lawrence Taylor (29): 18 Carl Banks (26): 11 Pepper Johnson (24): 13.3 Harry Carson (35): 13.3
These were the first two units that came to mind when I read the thread title.
 
Someday (soon) : Harrison, Timmons, Farrior, Woodley is going to be among that group. May not have quite the top-end appeal (though Harrison is getting there) - but that's a group that's incrediby sloid top to bottom. Woodley is erupting, Farrior is the most underrated defensive player of the last 5 years, IMO, and Timmons is about to explode.

 
Sam Huff and Chris Hanburger (who should be in the HoF) in the mid-60's was an excellent tandem for the Redskins, but I don't know who the third LB was with them.

 
On the 3-4s, if you take Denver, Baltimore and Pittsburgh out of the equation, you ain't left with much.
The 3-4s (by team):9 x Pit

5 x Den

4 x NYG

3 x Bal

2 x Oak

1 x NO

Seems you have a blind spot for the New York Football Giants! :confused:

 
Here's a list of the top LB corp (by the metric described above) for each franchise:

Code:
tm.yr	 lbs	GRD	 LB1					LB2					LB3					LB4rav-2006	3	15.4	Ray Lewis (31): 20	 Adalius Thomas (29)	Bart Scott (26): 13	gnb-1963	3	14.8	Ray Nitschke (27):	 Bill Forester (31):	Dan Currie (28): 14	chi-1987	3	14.5	Mike Singletary (29	Wilber Marshall (25	Otis Wilson (30): 1	kan-1972	3	14.5	Willie Lanier (27):	Bobby Bell (32): 16	Jim Lynch (27): 13.	nor-1990	4	14.4	Pat Swilling (26):	 Sam Mills (31): 17	 Rickey Jackson (32)	Vaughan Johnson (28pit-1978	3	13.8	Jack Ham (30): 17	  Jack Lambert (26):	 Loren Toews (27): 8	ram-1976	3	13.3	Isiah Robertson (27	Jack Reynolds (29):	Jim Youngblood (26)	phi-1954	3	13.2	Chuck Bednarik (29)	Bucko Kilroy (33):	 Wayne Robinson (24)	clt-1972	3	12.8	Mike Curtis (29): 1	Ted Hendricks (25):	Ray May (27): 8.666	crd-1994	3	12.3	Wilber Marshall (32	Seth Joyner (30): 1	Eric Hill (28): 7.6	tam-1999	3	12.2	Derrick Brooks (26)	Shelton Quarles (28	Hardy Nickerson (34	den-1979	4	12.1	Randy Gradishar (27	Tom Jackson (28): 1	Bob Swenson (26): 1	Joe Rizzo (29): 9dal-1967	3	12.1	Chuck Howley (31):	 Lee Roy Jordan (26)	Dave Edwards (28):	 cle-1952	3	12.1	Bill Willis (31): 1	Tommy W. Thompson (	Walt Michaels (23):	det-1962	3	12.1	Joe Schmidt (30): 1	Wayne H. Walker (26	Carl Brettschneider	was-1973	3	11.9	Chris Hanburger (32	Dave Robinson (32):	Harold McLinton (26	rai-1979	4	11.9	Ted Hendricks (32):	Phil Villapiano (30	Rod Martin (25): 13	Monte Johnson (28):nyg-1991	4	11.6	Lawrence Taylor (32	Pepper Johnson (27)	Carl Banks (29): 11	Gary Reasons (29):nyj-1998	3	11.6	Mo Lewis (29): 13.6	Bryan Cox (30): 12.	Pepper Johnson (34)	min-1970	3	11.3	Wally Hilgenberg (2	Roy Winston (30): 1	Lonnie Warwick (28)	oti-1993	3	11.2	Wilber Marshall (31	Al Smith (29): 10.6	Eddie Robinson (23)	mia-2003	3	11.1	Zach Thomas (30): 1	Junior Seau (34): 1	Morlon Greenwood (2	cin-1972	3	10.6	Bill Bergey (27): 1	Al Beauchamp (28):	 Ken Avery (28): 8.3	sfo-1972	3	10.5	Dave Wilcox (30): 1	Skip Vanderbundt (2	Frank Nunley (27):	 nwe-2007	4	10.4	Adalius Thomas (30)	Mike Vrabel (32): 1	Rosevelt Colvin (30	Tedy Bruschi (34):sea-2001	3	10.3	Chad Brown (31): 14	Levon Kirkland (32)	Anthony Simmons (25	buf-1992	4	10.2	Cornelius Bennett (	Shane Conlan (28):	 Darryl Talley (32):	Carlton Bailey (28)atl-1973	3	 9.7	Greg Brezina (27):	 Tommy Nobis (30): 1	Don Hansen (29): 8.	sdg-2002	3	 9.7	Junior Seau (33): 1	Donnie Edwards (29)	Ben Leber (24): 7	jax-1999	3	 9.7	Bryce Paup (31): 12	Kevin Hardy (26): 1	Lonnie Marts (31):	 car-1998	4	 8.9	Greg Lloyd (33): 17	Michael Barrow (28)	Jeff Brady (30): 7	Kevin Greene (36):htx-2002	4	 7.7	Jamie Sharper (28):	Kailee Wong (26): 7	Jay Foreman (26): 7	Jeff Posey (27): 7
 
Sam Huff and Chris Hanburger (who should be in the HoF) in the mid-60's was an excellent tandem for the Redskins, but I don't know who the third LB was with them.
Huff was seven years older than Hanburger, so their careers didn't overlap that much. From '66 to '69, though, they were starters together. According to the system here, Huff has a peak AV of 17.3 (that's excellent) and Hanburger has a peak AV of 16.7 (also excellent). So yeah, those two are legitimate all time greats. The problem is Huff was old and Hanburger was young and no one else good was there.The best season was '66 -- Huff was 32 years old (17.3 AV), Hanburger was 25 (16.7 AV) but John Reger was 35 (AV of 11, but being 35 hurts a bit). The next year, Jim Caroll was there (AV of 4, age of 24), followed by Tom Roussel the next two years (peak AV of 5, ages 23 and 24). Two great LBs, for sure, but the awfulness at the LB3 was always really bad. Still, the '66 Skins come in at 11.6 for the trio, which puts them in the top 100 LB corps of all time.
 
Someday (soon) : Harrison, Timmons, Farrior, Woodley is going to be among that group. May not have quite the top-end appeal (though Harrison is getting there) - but that's a group that's incrediby sloid top to bottom. Woodley is erupting, Farrior is the most underrated defensive player of the last 5 years, IMO, and Timmons is about to explode.
Farrior's 11 years older than Timmons, and Harrison is 30 now, too. I sort of doubt that Farrior and Timmons will stay together for very long.
 
Surprised Carolina's Kevin Greene, Lamar Lathom, Sam Mills didnt get any love.
That's 1996. A few notes:Carolina played a 3-4, with Carlton Bailey being the 4th LB.Mills was 37 in '96, so it's hard to give Carolina much credit for that. Greene was 34, Bailey was good but not great (AV of 8.6) and Lamar Lathon was in his prime (29) and pretty good (peak AV of 11). So good names, but didn't come together too well age-wise.
 
Here's a list of the top LB corp (by the metric described above) for each franchise:pit-1978 3 13.8 Jack Ham (30): 17 Jack Lambert (26): Loren Toews (27): 8
Think this is an error for pit. without looking at any stats or metrics, Ham/Lambert/Russell was clearly a better trio than Ham/Lambert/Toews. ... and even you say as much above with your metrics:PIT-1976 Jack Ham (28): 17 Jack Lambert (24): 18 Andy Russell (35): 13.6Maybe I'm missing something here.
 
Here's a list of the top LB corp (by the metric described above) for each franchise:pit-1978 3 13.8 Jack Ham (30): 17 Jack Lambert (26): Loren Toews (27): 8
Think this is an error for pit. without looking at any stats or metrics, Ham/Lambert/Russell was clearly a better trio than Ham/Lambert/Toews. ... and even you say as much above with your metrics:PIT-1976 Jack Ham (28): 17 Jack Lambert (24): 18 Andy Russell (35): 13.6Maybe I'm missing something here.
What you're missing is age (twice).Russell was surely a better LB at his peak than Toews. However, Russell was 35 years old in 1976. As far as LBs go, that's ancient. My trivial study is not rocket science, but I came up with (based on looking at the top LBs in history and their aging patterns) the following age/talent distribution:
Code:
age   weight Russell Toews21	0.24	 3.3	2.022	0.43	 5.8	3.423	0.58	 8.0	4.724	0.72	 9.8	5.725	0.82	11.3	6.626	0.91	12.4	7.227	0.96	13.2	7.728	0.99	13.6	8.029	1.00	13.7	8.030	0.98	13.4	7.831	0.94	12.8	7.532	0.87	11.8	6.933	0.77	10.6	6.234	0.65	 8.9	5.235	0.51	 6.9	4.136	0.40	 5.5	3.237	0.30	 4.1	2.438	0.30	 4.1	2.439	0.30	 4.1	2.4
This says when they were both at their best, Russel was clearly better. But a 27 year old, in his prime Toews was worth 7.7 while a 35 year old, just about done Russell was worth only 6.9. Lambert would also be much better at 26 than 24, giving the '78 team another edge over the '76 team.Certainly, though, in practice the '76 Steelers defense was much better than the '78 Steelers, and maybe the '76 Steelers LB corp was much more effective than the '78 version. My method is designed to deal with wide sets of groups, and on average, 27 year old good LBs will be better than 35 year old really good LBs. There will certainly be instances where that's not true.
 
1) The Willie Lanier and Bobby Bell led KC Chiefs defenses of the 1960's and 1970's were among the best ever. Bell was a the first true Hybrid rush end and Lanier was a tremendous athlete in the middle.

2) The Steel Curtain in the 70's obviously is worthy of their recognition.

3) When Carl Banks reached his peak, The Giants LB foursome was devastating. LT and Carson were always hall of famers, but when Banks elevated his game they were tremendous

4) The Saints foursome was unique - all four were spectacular both individually and as a foursome yet none will make the HOF. Rickey Jackson clearly deserves it IMO and Sam Mills was probably better than any MLB in the league in the late 80's.

 
3) When Carl Banks reached his peak, The Giants LB foursome was devastating. LT and Carson were always hall of famers, but when Banks elevated his game they were tremendous
This was one of the things that surprised me. I hadn't realized that Carson was 9 years older than Banks. When Banks made his lone Pro Bowl at age 25, Carson was really on his last legs and would play just one more season.
 
NYG-1988 Lawrence Taylor (29): 18 Carl Banks (26): 11 Pepper Johnson (24): 13.3 Harry Carson (35): 13.3

The greatest defensive player of all time, a MLB second only to Singletary (and by less a margin than most think, imo) in his era, and an all 80's Decade player.

Pepper Johnson got referrenced in hip hop songs, so thats something - and seriously, he was not bad. But those three? So solid in the middle and SO athletic outside.

 
3) When Carl Banks reached his peak, The Giants LB foursome was devastating. LT and Carson were always hall of famers, but when Banks elevated his game they were tremendous
This was one of the things that surprised me. I hadn't realized that Carson was 9 years older than Banks. When Banks made his lone Pro Bowl at age 25, Carson was really on his last legs and would play just one more season.
Truth be told, by the time Banks hit his stride, Carson was already in the downside of his career. Its ironic that Banks regularly outshone Carson on the Giants Championship-calibre teams, because history remembers Carson as an all-time great player and Banks as a supporting player.
 
Here's a list of the top LB corp (by the metric described above) for each franchise:pit-1978 3 13.8 Jack Ham (30): 17 Jack Lambert (26): Loren Toews (27): 8
Think this is an error for pit. without looking at any stats or metrics, Ham/Lambert/Russell was clearly a better trio than Ham/Lambert/Toews. ... and even you say as much above with your metrics:PIT-1976 Jack Ham (28): 17 Jack Lambert (24): 18 Andy Russell (35): 13.6Maybe I'm missing something here.
What you're missing is age (twice).....This says when they were both at their best, Russel was clearly better. But a 27 year old, in his prime Toews was worth 7.7 while a 35 year old, just about done Russell was worth only 6.9.
Gotcha. I thought the final "value" you had assigned them (last # tied to each) was already age adjusted.Edit: And I still would take a 35 year old Russell against any Loren Toews year you want to imagine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Someday (soon) : Harrison, Timmons, Farrior, Woodley is going to be among that group. May not have quite the top-end appeal (though Harrison is getting there) - but that's a group that's incrediby sloid top to bottom. Woodley is erupting, Farrior is the most underrated defensive player of the last 5 years, IMO, and Timmons is about to explode.
Farrior's 11 years older than Timmons, and Harrison is 30 now, too. I sort of doubt that Farrior and Timmons will stay together for very long.
They won't need to be.. Farrior has 2 more years in him and that's all it's going to take for Timmons to establish himself as a top-flight LB. In fact, I think it happens this year.
 
Nitsche is not getting enough respect in your numbers, not nearly so.
Certainly a reasonable response. That's mostly because of the star quality on those Packers teams -- there is only so much of a credit pie to be divided. In 1966, Nitschke's best season according to this system, Willie Davis, Lee Roy Caffey, Herb Adderley and Willie Wood were all 1st team All-Pro nominations. Henry Jordan and Dave Robinson were Pro Bowlers. Cornerback Bob Jeter had 5 INTs and 2 TDs and would be a first team All Pro the next season.Those Green Bay Packers defenses were great, but with all the accolades those players collected, Nitschke won't be able to stand out on a super elite level. He comes in next to Derrick Thomas, Junior Seau and Karl Mecklenburg, so it's not like he's a scrub here. But there are many limitations to the system I used.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top