What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Greatest playoff coach of all time (1 Viewer)

Doug Drinen

Moderator
Simply comparing playoff records doesn't give a complete picture because it doesn't take into account the strengths of the teams that the coaches were working with. For example, George Seifert was 10-5 in the playoffs during his career while Tony Dungy is 5-7. But Seifert's teams were obviously much stronger, on the whole, than Dungy's. By my count, Seifert's teams were the clear favorites in 11 of those 15 games.

Of course, it is to Seifert's credit --- at least to some extent --- that his teams were such heavy favorites. That means they were great teams, which is evidence that Seifert is a good coach. But that's not what I'm trying to measure here. What I want to know is: what coaches have done the best job of winning games they weren't supposed to win in the playoffs?

So here's the methodology:

1. look at every playoff game since the merger (1970--2004)

2. make an estimate of each team's probability of winning that game (details below for the :nerd: crowd).

3. for each coach, add his team's estimated win probability for each game. This gives the number of games he was "supposed to" win.

4. count up the number of games his teams actually won.

5. compare his actual record to his expected record.

For instance, George Seifert's actual record was 10-5. His expected record is also 10-5. So he did no better and no worse than expected. Likewise, Dungy's actual is 5-7 and his expected record is also 5-7. So he too, has been neither a good or a bad playoff coach (at least according to this methodology).

Here is the full list (more fine print follows):

extraCoach Expected Actual wins----------------------------------------Chuck Noll 12-12 16- 8 +3.9Bill Belichick 6- 5 10- 1 +3.9Joe Gibbs 13- 8 16- 5 +3.2Tom Landry 16-15 19-12 +3.1Jimmy Johnson 6- 7 9- 4 +2.8Brian Billick 3- 4 5- 2 +2.2Bill Walsh 8- 6 10- 4 +2.1Bill Parcells 9- 9 11- 7 +2.0Tom Flores 7- 4 8- 3 +1.5Bum Phillips 3- 4 4- 3 +1.4Jerry Burns 2- 4 3- 3 +1.3Raymond Berry 2- 3 3- 2 +1.3Mike Shanahan 6- 5 7- 4 +1.2Jon Gruden 4- 3 5- 2 +1.1Barry Switzer 4- 3 5- 2 +0.9John Madden 7- 7 8- 6 +0.8Dan Reeves 10-10 11- 9 +0.8John Robinson 3- 7 4- 6 +0.7Don McCafferty 3- 2 4- 1 +0.7Herman Edwards 1- 4 2- 3 +0.5Ray Malavasi 3- 3 3- 3 +0.4Jerry Glanville 3- 4 3- 4 +0.4Jeff Fisher 5- 4 5- 4 +0.4Mike Holmgren 9- 8 9- 8 +0.3Marv Levy 11- 8 11- 8 +0.3Tom Coughlin 4- 4 4- 4 +0.3Sam Wyche 3- 2 3- 2 +0.2Andy Reid 7- 5 7- 5 +0.0Dick Nolan 2- 3 2- 3 -0.0Dave Wannstedt 2- 3 2- 3 -0.1Ted Marchibroda 2- 4 2- 4 -0.2George Seifert 10- 5 10- 5 -0.2Tony Dungy 5- 7 5- 7 -0.2Art Shell 2- 3 2- 3 -0.4Red Miller 2- 3 2- 3 -0.5Bobby Ross 4- 4 3- 5 -0.6Steve Mariucci 4- 3 3- 4 -0.6Bud Grant 9- 9 8-10 -0.7Don Coryell 4- 5 3- 6 -0.8Jim Fassel 3- 2 2- 3 -1.0Mike Martz 4- 3 3- 4 -1.0George Allen 3- 4 2- 5 -1.0Dick Vermeil 7- 4 6- 5 -1.0Chuck Knox 8-10 7-11 -1.0Mike Sherman 3- 3 2- 4 -1.2Wayne Fontes 2- 3 1- 4 -1.5Mike Ditka 7- 5 6- 6 -1.5Jack Pardee 3- 3 1- 5 -1.8Dennis Green 6- 6 4- 8 -2.0Don Shula 19-12 17-14 -2.1Bill Cowher 10- 7 8- 9 -2.3Jim Mora 3- 3 0- 6 -3.3Marty Schottenheimer 9- 8 5-12 -3.7Fine print:1. only games played since the merger are counted. So e.g. Don Shula's record in the 1960s is ignored.

2. only coaches with at least 5 playoff games are counted.

3. the "expected records" listed above are rounded to the nearest integer.

4. the formula for estimated win probability is:

WinProb = 1 / (1 + e^(-.423*wdiff - .238*hfa))

wdiff = difference in wins between the two teams (scaled to 16 games)

hfa = 1 if at home, -1 if on road

e = the base of the natural log =~ 2.7181...

This formula is based on a logit regression of all playoff games since 1970. Try it out, it gives answers that are fairly reasonable in the majority of cases.

 
I think this is a GREAT statistical excercise, but there will always be certain inherant biases in something like this. First, won/loss record isn't the best of measures of teams, as it doesn't have the highest correlation with winning. Scoring differential might yield more accurate results. I've also heard that no simple statistic corresponds better with winning than yards per attempt passing and yards allowed per attempt passing. Maybe run the numbers with YPA-YAPA differential instead of wins?Also, the playoffs behave weirdly since there's not a set number of games- it's win and advance. It's possible for someone to have played 5 playoff games and be 4-1 with a projected record of 2-3, despite the fact that he only made the playoffs twice (i.e. more projected playoff losses than actual playoff appearances). Thinking about this, I guess it wouldn't really bias the stats any, it just sits a little bit uneasily with me.Anyway, on the whole, great work. I always love analysis like this.

 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
:goodposting: Just going off W-L record, BB needs to go 6-4 in his next 10 playoff games to match Gibbs' 16-5 record. 6-4 in the postseason isn't easy. Shanahan is 0-3 since his last SB win.

 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
But we're in the salary cap era now and BB has had to do it with superior coaching, not superior talent, which is the luxury that Noll, Landry and Gibbs had back in the day.
 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
But we're in the salary cap era now and BB has had to do it with superior coaching, not superior talent, which is the luxury that Noll, Landry and Gibbs had back in the day.
:goodposting: Huge difference now. The system is in place to promote parity, bring the best teams back to the pack- yet BB has gone on this historic run.

Of course, as long as he is still coaching there is the chance that he diminishes his standing by being good enough to make the playoffs but not good enough to win. However, at this point in time, I don't see how BB can't be termed best ever.

 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
But we're in the salary cap era now and BB has had to do it with superior coaching, not superior talent, which is the luxury that Noll, Landry and Gibbs had back in the day.
:goodposting: Huge difference now. The system is in place to promote parity, bring the best teams back to the pack- yet BB has gone on this historic run.

Of course, as long as he is still coaching there is the chance that he diminishes his standing by being good enough to make the playoffs but not good enough to win. However, at this point in time, I don't see how BB can't be termed best ever.
In general I agree that the cap and FA hurt your ability to compare across eras. That is mitigated, however to a degree by the fact that the fact that these stats only involve playoff teams, which means that the truly inferior teams were already excluded from the analysis. As for Gibbs specifically having truly "superior" talent despite coaching before the salary cap and FA, that only occured in 2 of his 4 Super Bowls, following the 1983 and 1991 seasons, and they only won the latter SB. The 1982 and 1987 teams were not particularly talented overall, especially the latter. He also was working with many different QB's, RB's and even WR's, and many different defenses. I'd suggest that that contrasts greatly from a guy like Chuck Noll who had essentially the same team on the field for a decade.

 
Gibbs' Redskins were underdogs in SB 22 to Denver.I'm pretty sure they were underdogs to the Bears in multiple playoff meetings and the Redskins won most of those meetings.I almost wonder if their opponents were overrated often.

 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
But we're in the salary cap era now and BB has had to do it with superior coaching, not superior talent, which is the luxury that Noll, Landry and Gibbs had back in the day.
:goodposting: Huge difference now. The system is in place to promote parity, bring the best teams back to the pack- yet BB has gone on this historic run.

Of course, as long as he is still coaching there is the chance that he diminishes his standing by being good enough to make the playoffs but not good enough to win. However, at this point in time, I don't see how BB can't be termed best ever.
In general I agree that the cap and FA hurt your ability to compare across eras. That is mitigated, however to a degree by the fact that the fact that these stats only involve playoff teams, which means that the truly inferior teams were already excluded from the analysis. As for Gibbs specifically having truly "superior" talent despite coaching before the salary cap and FA, that only occured in 2 of his 4 Super Bowls, following the 1983 and 1991 seasons, and they only won the latter SB. The 1982 and 1987 teams were not particularly talented overall, especially the latter. He also was working with many different QB's, RB's and even WR's, and many different defenses. I'd suggest that that contrasts greatly from a guy like Chuck Noll who had essentially the same team on the field for a decade.
Yep, Gibbs only has 1 player in the HOF (John Riggins). Darrell Green will be inducted in a few years from now and maybe Monk will get in one day. That's about it. Maybe Jacoby or Grimm will get in with the veterans committee, but probably not. I think Noll has like 246 players in the HOF.I know this thread is about the playoffs, but one of Gibbs' greatest wins, perfectly exemplifying winning when you shouldn't, was in the 1987 regular season. He took a full squad of scab players and beat Dallas in Dallas. Dallas had several players cross the line and play. Link to game story.

 
I go back to a very basic statistic.

Look at the point differential for each team in the last 15 or so super bowls. That is, subtract their points allowed from their points scored. The team with the bigger number always wins except in two cases.

The 1990 game when the Giants upset the Bills.

The 2001 game when the Patriots upset the Rams.

These are the only two exceptions, and Belichick coached both winners. As DC of the Giants, he schemed a gameplan that hangs in the hall of fame. And we all know how amazing the win over the Rams was in 2001.

 
Gibbs, Parcells, and BB would all get my approval.Landry and Knoll are certainly worthy for another era.Walsh could very well be the best though. I don't think he gets enough credit around here. He gets his due with the WCO but that's about it, or so it seems.

 
These are the only two exceptions, and Belichick coached both winners. As DC of the Giants, he schemed a gameplan that hangs in the hall of fame. And we all know how amazing the win over the Rams was in 2001.
He and many other quality coaches did, not just him.
 
I'm not a Pats fan... and usually good and not letting recent history sway me... but BB is it for me. Impressive what he's done... Troy Brown as a CB in the SB... lawdy.Chuck Noll inherited a team full of HoFers... yawn... never got to see him elsewhere, much less in an era of free agency and so much spinnage of assistants.Bill Walsh I'll put up there too.

 
My vote is for BB.
Belly is currently riding a hot streak. 6 years ago it would have been Shanny. Let's give him a couple more playoff appearances before we start crowning him the greatest of all time.
But we're in the salary cap era now and BB has had to do it with superior coaching, not superior talent, which is the luxury that Noll, Landry and Gibbs had back in the day.
Yes, we're in the salary cap era, and yes, that limits the talent on the Patriots. It also limits the talent on the Patriots opponents. I think all comparisons are still valid. For instance, the Patriots were never able to stockpile talent like the 1970s Steelers... but they never faced a foe who stockpiled talent, like the 1970s Raiders, either.Winning is harder in the regular season, because the gap between the best teams and the worst teams is smaller. Winning should be just about as difficult in the postseason, since the gap between the elite teams was never great to begin with.

:goodposting:

Huge difference now. The system is in place to promote parity, bring the best teams back to the pack- yet BB has gone on this historic run.

Of course, as long as he is still coaching there is the chance that he diminishes his standing by being good enough to make the playoffs but not good enough to win. However, at this point in time, I don't see how BB can't be termed best ever.
Allow me to reiterate... Bill Bellichick has been coaching against teams that have ALSO been brought back to the pack, just like his has. It's not like the Patriots were the only team that was prevented from stockpiling talent, you know.
 
Seriously I expect Belichick to win 6 super bowls at least in New England. That ought to put an end to this debate real quick. Before he's done, the NFL may implement some sort of anti-Belichick rules to try to stop him. Don't laugh, those sorts of crazy things happen.

 
Chuck Noll's Expected: 12-12. I've got serious problems with that.
Maybe you have forgotten that Noll took a few very mediocre Steeler teams to the playoffs in the 80s. Or maybe you have forgotten that the Raiders and Cowboys had some pretty darn good teams to compete against Noll's Steelers in the 70s. Rumor has it the Dolphins were pretty tough too, particularly in 72. Here is the rundown:
Pitt Opp winYear record Opp record prob--------------------------------1972 11-3-0 oak 10-3-1 0.6181972 11-3-0 mia 14-0-0 0.2291973 10-4-0 oak 9-4-1 0.5011974 10-3-1 buf 9-5-0 0.7241974 10-3-1 oak 12-2-0 0.2761974 10-3-1 min 10-4-0 0.5601975 12-2-0 bal 10-4-0 0.7691975 12-2-0 oak 11-3-0 0.6731975 12-2-0 dal 10-4-0 0.7241976 10-4-0 bal 11-3-0 0.3271976 10-4-0 oak 13-1-0 0.1561977 9-5-0 den 12-2-0 0.1561978 14-2-0 den 10-6-0 0.8731978 14-2-0 hou 10-6-0 0.8731978 14-2-0 dal 12-4-0 0.7001979 12-4-0 mia 10-6-0 0.7471979 12-4-0 hou 11-5-0 0.6591979 12-4-0 ram 9-7-0 0.7811982 6-3-0 sdg 6-3-0 0.5591983 10-6-0 rai 12-4-0 0.2531984 9-7-0 den 13-3-0 0.1271984 9-7-0 mia 14-2-0 0.0871989 9-7-0 hou 9-7-0 0.4411989 9-7-0 den 11-5-0 0.253As you can see, there were several games where Noll's Steelers were, at least on paper, a pretty heavy underdog: against the Dolphins in 72, against the Raiders in 74 and 76 and 83, against a 12-2 Denver team in 77, and in all their games after 82.Combined record of Noll's teams: 257-93-3

Combined record of opponents: 258-93-2

12-12 sounds about right to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top